Validation of a technique to assess radial torsion in the presence of procurvatum and valgus deformity using computed tomography: a cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE To validate a technique to assess radial torsion with and without procurvatum and valgus deformity using computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN Anatomic study. ANIMALS Radii (n=3) from normal dogs. METHODS Three cadaveric radii were scanned using CT (3 mm slices). Transverse image sections were assessed at the distal and proximal physeal scar parallel to the joint surface in both sagittal and dorsal planes. Anatomic landmarks of the radius were identified and torsion was measured. A hinged Ilizarov circular external skeletal fixator was constructed to create known procurvatum, valgus, and torsional deformities. RESULTS Between observers results were highly correlated for calculation of torsion (r=0.972, r(2)=0.9448, P<.00001). Mean baseline torsion of the radius in the construct was 4.88 degrees . At 20 degrees procurvatum and valgus, mean calculated torsion was 5.07 degrees (confidence interval [CI]=4.6-5.6 degrees ). At 20 degrees procurvatum and valgus with 22.5 degrees -induced torsion, mean measured torsion was 25.4 degrees (expected=27.38 degrees ; CI=22.7-28.1 degrees ). At 40 degrees procurvatum and valgus and 45 degrees -induced torsion, mean measured torsion was 51.1 degrees (expected=49.88 degrees ; CI=-49.2 to 53.0 degrees ). CONCLUSION Assessment of radial torsion by CT is reproducible and accurate in the presence of procurvatum and valgus antebrachial angular limb deformities in the dog. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Despite complex presurgical planning, current measurements only allow for measurement of valgus and procurvatum deformities in the sagittal and dorsal planes, this method allows for more precise measurements of radial torsion in the transverse plane.

[1]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Assessment of radial and ulnar torsion profiles with cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging. A study of volunteers. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  J. Cook,et al.  Principles of uniapical and biapical radial deformity correction using dome osteotomies and the center of rotation of angulation methodology in dogs. , 2006, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[3]  G. Voorhout,et al.  Prognostic factors in treating antebrachial growth deformities with a lengthening procedure using a circular external skeletal fixation system in dogs. , 2005, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[4]  W. Drost,et al.  Computed tomographic determination of tibial torsion in the dog. , 2005, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[5]  H. Miao,et al.  Synthesis of Single‐Crystalline Silicon Nitride Nanobelts Via Catalyst‐Assisted Pyrolysis of a Polysilazane , 2005 .

[6]  S. O'driscoll,et al.  Anatomical considerations of the radius , 2004, Clinical anatomy.

[7]  M. K. Quinn,et al.  Realignment of the radius in canine antebrachial growth deformities treated with corrective osteotomy and bilateral (type II) external fixation. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[9]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Quantification of the Radial Torsion Angle with Computerized Tomography in Cadaver Specimens* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  G. Breur,et al.  Incidence of Canine Appendicular Musculoskeletal Disorders in 16 Veterinary Teaching Hospitals from 1980 through 1989 , 1994, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[11]  D. Matthiesen,et al.  Treatment of forelimb growth plate deformity in 11 dogs by radial dome osteotomy and external coaptation. , 1991, Veterinary surgery : VS.