Motion by curvature and impurity drag: resolution of a mobility paradox

We rederive and explain the paradoxical prediction, confirmed by experiment, that the normal velocity,V, of a curved antiphase domain boundary (APB) in an ordered alloy tends to a finite limit at a critical point, where the APB eAectively disappears, its surface energy g tending to 0, and its thickness l diverging. The prediction is in apparent contradiction to the expectation that the velocity of the APB should tend to 0 based on the notion thatV should be proportional to g and inversely proportional to l. Combining an Allen-Cahn equation for the rate of change of the order parameter, a non-conserved quan- tity, with a Cahn-Hilliard equation for the diAusion of one of the chemical components of an alloy, a con- served quantity, we obtain a system from which we derive an expression, via formal asymptotics, forV of an APB domain boundary in an ordered alloy. The drags from the two types of quantities are found to be additive. We find that the drag from the changes in ordering accompanying the motion of the APB decreases inversely as the thickness. Thus, at the critical temperature where the thickness of an APB diverges and its g tends to 0, the drag tends to 0. This resolves the paradoxical behavior of APB at the critical point; they continue to move up to the limiting condition where they, and their driving force for motion, disappear. The drag from the conserved component, which moves with the boundary as an adsorbed layer, exerts a drag on the boundary that is similar to what is predicted for impurity drag. In general the drag is given by a compositional integral through the interface that is not simply related to either the thickness or the total adsorption. However, for thick compositional wetting layers the drag indeed varies with thickness. We believe that the distinction we have encountered in the behavior of com- position and order parameter is quite general for motion of interfaces, unless strong cross-eAects influence the evolution of the system. Our results yield a unification and reconciliation of several diverse theories of interface motion. 7 2000 Acta Metallurgica Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  B. Widom.  Antonoff's Rule and the Structure of Interfaces near Tricritical Points , 1975 .

[2]  Charles M. Elliott,et al.  The Cahn–Hilliard equation with a concentration dependent mobility: motion by minus the Laplacian of the mean curvature , 1996, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[3]  A. Lacey,et al.  Motion by curvature in generalized Cahn-Allen models , 1994 .

[4]  Amy Novick-Cohen,et al.  Triple-junction motion for an Allen-Cahn/Cahn-Hilliard system , 2000 .

[5]  Shui-Nee Chow,et al.  Spatially Discrete Nonlinear Diffusion Equations , 1995 .

[6]  A. Umantsev.  Thermal drag of the antiphase domain boundary motion , 1998 .

[7]  John W. Cahn,et al.  Linking anisotropic sharp and diffuse surface motion laws via gradient flows , 1994 .

[8]  W. Craig Carter,et al.  Variational methods for microstructural-evolution theories , 1997 .

[9]  John W. Cahn,et al.  The Impurity‐Drag Effect in Grain Boundary Motion , 1962 .

[10]  G. Meyrick.  On the initiation of discontinuous precipitation , 1976 .

[11]  C. Bauer,et al.  Effect of impurities on the stability of a moving grain boundary , 1975 .

[12]  Solute-drag effects at migrating diffuse interfaces—II. Experimental investigation of APB migration kinetics and comparison to theory , 1986 .

[13]  Long-Qing Chen,et al.  Computer simulation of structural transformations during precipitation of an ordered intermetallic phase , 1991 .

[14]  J. Taylor,et al.  Overview no. 113 surface motion by surface diffusion , 1994 .

[15]  Xinfu Chen,et al.  Global asymptotic limit of solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation , 1996 .

[16]  Barbara Stoth,et al.  Convergence of the Cahn-Hilliard Equation to the Mullins-Sekerka Problem in Spherical Symmetry , 1996 .

[17]  J. Cahn,et al.  A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coasening , 1979 .

[18]  Antonio Fasano,et al.  Free boundary problems : theory and applications , 1983 .

[19]  Robert L. Pego,et al.  Front migration in the nonlinear Cahn-Hilliard equation , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Annick Loiseau.  The role of interfaces and domain boundaries in order—7disorder transitions , 1996 .

[21]  J. Cahn,et al.  Evolution equations for phase separation and ordering in binary alloys , 1994 .

[22]  Samuel M. Allen,et al.  Mechanisms of phase transformations within the miscibility gap of Fe-rich Fe-Al alloys , 1976 .

[23]  Peter W. Bates,et al.  Convergence of the Cahn-Hilliard equation to the Hele-Shaw model , 1994 .

[24]  W. Mullins.  Theory of Thermal Grooving , 1957 .

[25]  Paul C. Fife,et al.  A phase-field model for diffusion-induced grain-boundary motion , 1997 .

[26]  J. Keller,et al.  Fast reaction, slow diffusion, and curve shortening , 1989 .

[27]  J. Taylor,et al.  II—mean curvature and weighted mean curvature , 1992 .

[28]  Lorenzo Giacomelli,et al.  Existence for an Allen-Cahn/Cahn-Hilliard system with degenerate mobility , 1999 .

[29]  Solute-drag effects at migrating diffuse interfaces—I. Theoretical analysis and application to apbs in FeAl alloys , 1986 .

[30]  Danielle Hilhorst,et al.  Finite-dimensional exponential attractor for a model for order-disorder and phase separation , 1994 .

[31]  NONEQUILIBRIUM PATTERN FORMATION INVOLVING BOTH CONSERVED AND NONCONSERVED ORDER PARAMETERS AND EFFECT OF LONG-RANGE INTERACTIONS , 1993 .

[32]  Tuckerman,et al.  Dynamical mechanism for the formation of metastable phases: The case of two nonconserved order parameters. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.