When the Meaning of Work Has Disappeared: Experimental Evidence on Employees' Performance and Emotions

This experiment tests for a causal relationship between the meaning of work and employees’ motivation to perform well. The study builds on an existing employer–employee relationship, adding realism to the ongoing research of task meaning. Owing to an unexpected project cancelation, we are able to study how varying the information provided about the meaning of previously conducted work—without the use of deception, but still maintaining a high level of control—affects subsequent performance. We observe a strong decline in exerted effort when we inform workers about the meaninglessness of a job already done. Our data also suggests that providing a supplemental alternative meaning perfectly compensates for this negative performance effect. Individual characteristics such as reciprocal inclinations and trust prompt different reactions. The data also show that the meaning of work affects workers’ emotions, but we cannot establish a clear relationship between emotional responses and performance. Data, as supple...

[1]  Dana Chandler,et al.  Breaking Monotony with Meaning: Motivation in Crowdsourcing Markets , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  Robert Dur,et al.  Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Y. Fried,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[4]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment , 1990 .

[6]  E. Fehr,et al.  Gift Exchange and Reciprocity in Competitive Experimental Markets , 1995 .

[7]  V. Mertins,et al.  Wage Delegation in the Field , 2019, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

[8]  Michael Kosfeld,et al.  The Effects of Financial and Recognition Incentives Across Work Contexts: The Role of Meaning , 2016 .

[9]  Oriana Bandiera,et al.  NO MARGIN, NO MISSION? A FIELD EXPERIMENT ON INCENTIVES FOR PRO-SOCIAL TASKS , 2011 .

[10]  Daniel John Zizzo,et al.  Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments , 2008 .

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness in the Labour Market – A Survey of Experimental Results , 2001 .

[12]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[13]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Motivating Agents: How Much Does the Mission Matter? , 2016, Journal of Labor Economics.

[14]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment , 1990 .

[15]  C. Puppe,et al.  The Currency of Reciprocity - Gift-Exchange in the Workplace , 2011 .

[16]  J. Heckman,et al.  Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[17]  A Gift is Not Always a Gift: Heterogeneity and Long‐Term Effects in a Gift Exchange Experiment , 2013 .

[18]  John A. List,et al.  One swallow doesn’t make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects , 2014 .

[19]  Carl-Walter Kohlmann,et al.  Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS). , 1996 .

[20]  Heike Hennig-Schmidt,et al.  In search of worker's real effort reciprocity: A field and a laboratory experiment , 2010 .

[21]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[22]  D. Ariely,et al.  Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos , 2008 .

[23]  Agnes Bäker,et al.  The Role of Task Meaning on Output in Groups: Experimental Evidence , 2014 .

[24]  Michael Kosfeld,et al.  Getting More Work for Nothing? Symbolic Awards and Worker Performance , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Adam M. Grant.  The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Persönlichkeit und Personalforschung. Vorstellung einer Kurzskala zur Messung der „Big Five” , 2009 .

[27]  George A. Akerlof.  Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[28]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  E. Fehr,et al.  Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation , 1993 .

[30]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[31]  Omar Al-Ubaydli,et al.  On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With a Response to Camerer , 2012 .

[32]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Confidence-Enhanced Performance , 2001 .

[33]  Oriana Bandiera,et al.  No Margin, no Mission? A Field Experiment on Incentives for public service delivery , 2014 .

[34]  Julian C. Jamison,et al.  To Deceive or Not to Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments , 2006 .

[35]  A. Ichino,et al.  Clean Evidence on Peer Effects , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[36]  Brent D. Rosso,et al.  On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review , 2010 .

[37]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The Role of Emotion in Economic Behavior , 2007 .

[38]  Mirco Tonin,et al.  Disentangling the Sources of Pro-socially Motivated Effort: A Field Experiment , 2010 .

[39]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Because It Is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering… for Utility Theory , 1999 .

[40]  Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2013 .

[41]  Rosalind Searle,et al.  Trust in the employer: the role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations , 2011 .

[42]  Michael Kosfeld,et al.  Pro-Social Missions and Worker Motivation: An Experimental Study , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[43]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness in the Labour Market , 2002 .

[44]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .