Competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning

The present set of studies investigates the role of competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning. Previous studies have shown that peer work on identical information produces not only confrontation of viewpoints but also competitive conflict regulation, the latter of which is detrimental for learning. Conversely, working on complementary information produces positive interactions but also informational dependence, and good quality information transmission is needed to foster learning. The present research shows that discussion aids (note-taking and access to the study materials during discussion), a variable related to the quality of informational input, moderated the relationship between information interdependence and learning. This moderation was mediated by competitive conflict regulation: Students who worked on identical information with discussion aids reported more competitive conflict regulation than those without discussion aids, which in turn reduced learning, a pattern that did not appear for students working on complementary information. Moreover, when students worked on complementary information, the good quality of information transmission elicited by discussion aids led to high levels of learning for all students. Contributions to research on resource interdependence, socio-cognitive conflict, and peer learning are discussed.

[1]  P. Weener,et al.  Note taking and student verbalization as instrumental learning activities , 1974 .

[2]  Social marking, socio-cognitive conflict and cognitive development , 1987 .

[3]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Is a partner’s competence threatening during dyadic cooperative work? It depends on resource interdependence , 2009 .

[4]  G. Mugny,et al.  Persuasive constraint and expert versus non‐expert influence in intention to quit smoking , 2002 .

[5]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Note-taking fosters generative learning strategies in novices. , 1989 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Classroom Conflict: Controversy Versus Debate in Learning Groups , 1985 .

[7]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation , 2006 .

[8]  James D. Riley,et al.  An Analysis of Three Study Skills: Notetaking, Summarizing, and Rereading1 , 1979 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Positive Goal and Resource Interdependence on Individual Performance , 1996 .

[10]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[11]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[12]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[14]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Goals: When Uncertainty Makes a Difference , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .

[16]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Creative Controversy: Intellectual Challenge in the Classroom , 1992 .

[17]  Robyn M. Gillies,et al.  Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups , 2003 .

[18]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low‐expertise source in hypothesis testing , 1995 .

[19]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[20]  David C. Caverly,et al.  Textbook study reading. , 2000 .

[21]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[22]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Script Manipulations on Initial Learning and Transfer , 1988 .

[24]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Conflict Elaboration and Cognitive Outcomes , 2004 .

[25]  G. Mugny,et al.  Social Influence Dynamics in Aptitude Tasks , 2001 .

[26]  W. Doise,et al.  Constructivism in social psychology , 1989 .

[27]  Andrea Weiland,et al.  Immediate and Delayed Recall of Lecture Material as a Function of Note Taking , 1979 .

[28]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Complementarity of Information and Quality of Relationship in Cooperative Learning , 2001 .

[29]  P. Reile,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Maximizing Students' Potential for Success , 2008 .

[30]  David W. Johnson,et al.  New Developments in Social Interdependence Theory , 2005, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[31]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Social interdependence: interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[32]  S. J. Rosenholtz,et al.  The Effect of Classroom Structure on Shared Perceptions of Ability , 1980 .

[33]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration , 2007 .

[34]  G. Duveen,et al.  Social relations and cognitive development: the influence of conversation type and representations of gender , 2006 .

[35]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and the role of student interaction in learning , 2004 .

[36]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Achievement Goals in Social Interactions: Learning with Mastery vs. Performance Goals , 2007 .

[37]  G. Mugny,et al.  Self-competence, interaction style and expert social influence: Toward a correspondence hypothesis , 2002 .

[38]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Learning or Succeeding? Conflict Regulation With Mastery or Performance Goals , 2007 .

[39]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  D. Bearison,et al.  Social interaction, social observation, and cognitive development in young children , 1985 .

[41]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration , 1990 .

[42]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Are All Types of Cooperation Equal? Impact of Academic Controversy Versus Concurrence-Seeking on Health Education , 2002 .

[43]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Epistemic and relational conflicts in sharing identical vs. complementary information during cooperative learning , 2002 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  C. Howe,et al.  Effects of cognitive conflict, socio-cognitive conflict and imitation on children's socio-legal thinking , 1990 .

[46]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning , 2004 .

[47]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[48]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. , 1998 .

[49]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Goal and Resource Interdependence on Problem-Solving Success , 1989 .

[50]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. , 1977 .

[51]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Taking notes from lectures. , 2000 .

[52]  L. Oppenheimer,et al.  Socio‐cognitive conflict and peer interaction: Development of compensation , 1989 .

[53]  Rhona S. Weinstein,et al.  Classroom Factors Affecting Students’ Self-Evaluations: An Interactional Model , 1984 .

[54]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings , 2007 .

[55]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  Individual and collective conflicts of centrations in cognitive development , 1979 .

[56]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .