The future of climate modeling

Recently a number of scientists have proposed substantial changes to the practice of climate modeling, though they disagree over what those changes should be. We provide an overview and critical examination of three leading proposals: the unified approach, the hierarchy approach and the pluralist approach. The unified approach calls for an accelerated development of high-resolution models within a seamless prediction framework. The hierarchy approach calls for more attention to the development and systematic study of hierarchies of related models, with the aim of advancing understanding. The pluralist approach calls for greater diversity in modeling efforts, including, on some of its variants, more attention to empirical modeling. After identifying some of the scientific and institutional challenges faced by these proposals, we consider their expected gains and costs, relative to a business-as-usual modeling scenario. We find the proposals to be complementary, having valuable synergies. But since resource limitations make it unlikely that all three will be pursued, we offer some reflections on more limited changes in climate modeling that seem well within reach and that can be expected to yield substantial benefits.

[1]  Antje Weisheimer,et al.  Assessment of representations of model uncertainty in monthly and seasonal forecast ensembles , 2011 .

[2]  William F. Spotz,et al.  Climate modeling , 2002, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[3]  Judith A. Curry,et al.  Role for Eurasian Arctic shelf sea ice in a secularly varying hemispheric climate signal during the 20th century , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[4]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  A voyage through scales, a missing quadrillion and why the climate is not what you expect , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[5]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause , 2014 .

[6]  Tim Palmer.  Towards the probabilistic Earth‐system simulator: a vision for the future of climate and weather prediction , 2012 .

[7]  Brian J. Hoskins,et al.  Dynamical processes in the atmosphere and the use of models , 1983 .

[8]  E. Dunlea,et al.  A national strategy for advancing climate modeling , 2012 .

[9]  S. Kravtsov.  Empirical Model Reduction and the Modeling Hierarchy in Climate Dynamics and the Geosciences , 2008 .

[10]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  Reply to Roger A. Pielke Sr. on "A unified modeling approach to climate system prediction" , 2010 .

[11]  A. Whitehead,et al.  What might we learn from Climate Forecasts? , 2002 .

[12]  T. Palmer,et al.  More reliable forecasts with less precise computations: a fast-track route to cloud-resolved weather and climate simulators? , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Do We Need Better Predictions to Adapt to a Changing Climate , 2009 .

[14]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  The Weather and Climate: Emergent Laws and Multifractal Cascades , 2013 .

[15]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  Strategies: Revolution in Climate Prediction is Both Necessary and Possible: A Declaration at the World Modelling Summit for Climate Prediction , 2009 .

[16]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[17]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[18]  Wendy S. Parker,et al.  Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models , 2010, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  M. Rodwell,et al.  Toward Seamless Prediction: Calibration of Climate Change Projections Using Seasonal Forecasts , 2008 .

[20]  J. Annan,et al.  Can we trust climate models? , 2014 .

[21]  Imme Ebert-Uphoff,et al.  Causal Discovery for Climate Research Using Graphical Models , 2012 .

[22]  Tim Palmer,et al.  Climate forecasting: Build high-resolution global climate models , 2014, Nature.

[23]  Richard B. Rood,et al.  Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice , 2010 .

[24]  D A Stainforth,et al.  Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  James C McWilliams,et al.  Irreducible imprecision in atmospheric and oceanic simulations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models , 2010 .

[27]  Thomas Reichler,et al.  On the Effective Number of Climate Models , 2011 .

[28]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  An Evaluation of Decadal Probability Forecasts from State-of-the-Art Climate Models* , 2013 .

[29]  G. Meehl,et al.  A Unified Modeling Approach to Climate System Prediction , 2009 .

[30]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Potential for extreme loss in high-latitude Earth surface processes due to climate change , 2014 .

[31]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Dealing With Complexity and Extreme Events Using a Bottom-Up, Resource-Based Vulnerability Perspective , 2013 .

[32]  B. N. Ong,et al.  Going back to basics. , 1988, The Health service journal.

[33]  Jasper Knight,et al.  The impacts of climate change on terrestrial Earth surface systems , 2013 .

[34]  T. Palmer,et al.  Towards the probabilistic Earth‐system simulator: a vision for the future of climate and weather prediction , 2012 .

[35]  Antje Weisheimer,et al.  Addressing model error through atmospheric stochastic physical parametrizations: impact on the coupled ECMWF seasonal forecasting system , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Alan C. Love,et al.  COMPARING PART-WHOLE REDUCTIVE EXPLANATIONS IN BIOLOGY AND PHYSICS , 2011 .

[37]  Sergey Kravtsov,et al.  A new dynamical mechanism for major climate shifts , 2007 .

[38]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[39]  Roger A. Pielke.  Comments on A Unified Modeling Approach to Climate System Prediction , 2010 .

[40]  Wilco Hazeleger,et al.  Studies with the EC-Earth seamless earth system prediction model , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[41]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[42]  Isaac M. Held,et al.  The Gap between Simulation and Understanding in Climate Modeling , 2005 .

[43]  D. Stainforth,et al.  Predicting Climate Change: Lessons From Reductionism, Emergence, and the Past , 2009 .

[44]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Complex networks as a unified framework for descriptive analysis and predictive modeling in climate science , 2011, Stat. Anal. Data Min..

[45]  Masahiro Watanabe,et al.  Reliability and importance of structural diversity of climate model ensembles , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[46]  Alan C. Love,et al.  Comparing part-whole explanations in biology and physics , 2011 .

[47]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties with the Use of Recent Climate Observations , 2002, Science.

[48]  Hans von Storch,et al.  Complexity and extreme events in geosciences: an overview , 2013 .

[49]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  Toward a new generation of world climate research and computing facilities , 2010 .

[50]  T. N. Palmer,et al.  On the reliability of seasonal climate forecasts , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[51]  Leonid Oliker,et al.  Hardware/software co‐design of global cloud system resolving models , 2011 .

[52]  Anastasios A. Tsonis,et al.  Climate Subsystems: Pacemakers of Decadal Climate Variability , 2013 .

[53]  Jk Joel Katzav,et al.  Severe testing of climate change hypotheses , 2013 .

[54]  G. Meehl,et al.  Decadal climate prediction: an update from the trenches , 2014 .

[55]  Isaac Held,et al.  Simplicity amid Complexity , 2014, Science.

[56]  Bernard. Coakley.  Predicting Climate Change : Lessons From Reductionism , Emergence , and the Past , .

[57]  Paul N. Edwards,et al.  History of climate modeling , 2011 .

[58]  J. Murphy,et al.  A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.