20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling

The merits of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) were already known in the 1960s. It was, however, not until the 1990s that UCAs were clinically approved and marketed. In these years, it was realized that the UCAs are not just efficient ultrasound scatterers, but that their main constituent, the coated gas microbubble, acts as a nonlinear resonator and, as such, is capable of generating harmonic energy. Subharmonic, ultraharmonic, and higher harmonic frequencies of the transmitted ultrasound frequency have been reported. This opened up new prospects for their use and several detection strategies have been developed to exploit this harmonic energy to discriminate the contrast bubbles from surrounding tissue. This insight created a need for tools to study coated bubble behavior in an ultrasound field and the first models were developed. Since then, 20 years have elapsed, in which a broad range of UCAs and UCA models have been developed. Although the models have helped in understanding the responses of coated bubbles, the influence of the coating has not been fully elucidated to date and UCA models are still being improved. The aim of this review paper is to offer an overview in these developments and indicate future directions for research.

[1]  Werner Lauterborn,et al.  Numerical investigation of nonlinear oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1976 .

[2]  M. Emmer,et al.  Radial modulation of single microbubbles , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Nico de Jong,et al.  The onset of microbubble vibration. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  N. Pelekasis,et al.  Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  An acoustic backscattering technique for the detection of transient cavitation produced by microsecond pulses of ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Optical observations of microbubble oscillation in small tubes , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[8]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Effect of focused ultrasound applied with an ultrasound contrast agent on the tight junctional integrity of the brain microvascular endothelium. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  D. May,et al.  Nondestructive subharmonic imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Otto Kamp,et al.  Ultrasound and microbubble-induced intra- and intercellular bioeffects in primary endothelial cells. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  T. Matula,et al.  Microbubble sizing and shell characterization using flow cytometry , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography: a 25-year retrospective. , 2008, Circulation.

[15]  David S. Martin,et al.  MRI in Pediatric Neuroradiology , 1992 .

[16]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior: a second-order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. Cojoc,et al.  History force on coated microbubbles propelled by ultrasound , 2009 .

[18]  M. S. Plesset,et al.  On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid-gas solutions , 1950 .

[19]  Kevin Wei,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Applications and Limitations , 2012, Current problems in cardiology.

[20]  A. Nadim,et al.  Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids , 2002 .

[21]  Roman E. Glazman Effects of adsorbed films on gas bubble radial oscillations , 1983 .

[22]  A. B. Basset,et al.  Treatise on Hydrodynamics , 1889, Nature.

[23]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  The thermal behaviour of oscillating gas bubbles , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubble Contrast Agents: Targeted Ultrasound Imaging and Ultrasound-Assisted Drug-Delivery Applications , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[26]  G. W. Johnston,et al.  Numerical studies of the spectrum of low‐intensity ultrasound scattered by bubbles , 1985 .

[27]  M. Versluis,et al.  Nonspherical vibrations of microbubbles in contact with a wall: a pilot study at low mechanical index. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  A Bouakaz,et al.  Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  T. Porter,et al.  Intravenous perfluoropropane-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin produces myocardial ultrasound contrast that correlates with coronary blood flow. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[30]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[31]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound: development and evaluation of polymer-coated microbubbles. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[32]  J. Goldman,et al.  Pulmonary hemodynamic effects of dipyridamole infusion in patients with normal and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure receiving PB127. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[33]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical shape oscillations of coated microbubbles in contact with a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Y. Ishida,et al.  Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography equipped with late Kupffer-phase image obtained by sonazoid in patients with colorectal liver metastases. , 2008, World journal of gastroenterology.

[35]  R Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[36]  T G Leighton,et al.  New approaches to contrast agent modelling , 2004 .

[37]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[38]  T. Shiina,et al.  [Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres]. , 1998, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[39]  O. Kamp,et al.  The use of contrast echocardiography for the detection of cardiac shunts. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[40]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[41]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Advances in Molecular Imaging with Ultrasound , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[42]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[43]  P. Dayton,et al.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[44]  P. Rafter,et al.  Means for increasing sensitivity in non-linear ultrasound imaging systems , 1997 .

[45]  J. Weiss,et al.  Comparison of usefulness of dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography to technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease (PB127 Multicenter Phase 2 Trial results). , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[46]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  WFUMB Safety Symposium on Ultrasound Contrast Agents: clinical applications and safety concerns. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[47]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  The disappearance of ultrasound contrast bubbles: observations of bubble dissolution and cavitation nucleation. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  N. Jong,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric microcapsules for selective ultrasound-triggered drug release , 2011 .

[49]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging , 2007 .

[50]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[51]  N de Jong,et al.  Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. , 1991, Ultrasonics.

[52]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[53]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[55]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  B. Cosyns,et al.  Bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents in daily clinical practice: fact or fiction? , 2007, European heart journal.

[57]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[58]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[62]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[63]  M. Rashid,et al.  Dynamics of a Hyperelastic Gas-Filled Spherical Shell in a Viscous Fluid , 2004 .

[64]  Katherine W. Ferrara,et al.  Lipid-Shelled Vehicles: Engineering for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Drug Delivery , 2009 .

[65]  L. Rayleigh VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity , 1917 .

[66]  J. Ophir,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[67]  Isabelle Tardy,et al.  BR55: A Lipopeptide-Based VEGFR2-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent for Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[68]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Single bubble sonoluminescence , 2002 .

[69]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[70]  F Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[71]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Preparation of targeted microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[72]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[73]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[74]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[75]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[76]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[77]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  Theoretical model for the threshold onset of contrast microbubble oscillations , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[79]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[80]  D. Lohse,et al.  Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[81]  M. Plesset The Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles , 1949 .

[82]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound and Microbubble-Targeted Delivery of Macromolecules Is Regulated by Induction of Endocytosis and Pore Formation , 2009, Circulation research.

[83]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[84]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[85]  B B Goldberg,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents. , 1993, Clinics in diagnostic ultrasound.

[86]  Robert I. Nigmatulin,et al.  Dynamics, heat and mass transfer of vapour-gas bubbles in a liquid , 1981 .

[87]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Increasing the Endothelial Layer Permeability Through Ultrasound-Activated Microbubbles , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[88]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Albumin microbubble echo-contrast material as an enhancer for ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis. , 1995, Circulation.

[89]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Microbubble oscillation in tubes with diameters of 12, 25, and 195 microns , 2006 .

[90]  J. Lefebvre,et al.  P4D-1 Development of a Finite Element Model of Ultrasound Contrast Agent , 2007, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[91]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound triggered image-guided drug delivery. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[92]  V L Newhouse,et al.  Second harmonic ultrasonic blood perfusion measurement. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[93]  J. Rosette,et al.  Targeted microbubble prostate cancer imaging with BR55 , 2012 .

[94]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[95]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[96]  Stefaan C De Smedt,et al.  Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[97]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrasound-induced gas release from contrast agent microbubbles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[98]  B. E. Noltingk,et al.  Cavitation produced by Ultrasonics , 1950 .

[99]  V L Newhouse,et al.  Simulated capillary blood flow measurement using a nonlinear ultrasonic contrast agent. , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[100]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[101]  P. Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[102]  E Stride,et al.  The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[103]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[104]  D. Lohse,et al.  Response of bubbles to diagnostic ultrasound: a unifying theoretical approach , 1998, cond-mat/9805217.

[105]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[106]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[107]  N. Nanda,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation of SonoVue for Improved Endocardial Border Delineation , 2002, Echocardiography.

[108]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Characterizing the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles for carotid imaging. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.