Sex differences in aortic valve calcification in severe aortic valve stenosis: association between computer tomography assessed calcification and valvular calcium concentrations.

AIMS The aims of this study were to investigate the correlation and sex differences between total valve calcium, valve calcium concentration, and aortic valve calcification (AVC) in explanted valves from patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-nine patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) scheduled for elective AVR underwent echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography (CT) prior to surgery (AVCin vivo) and CT of the explanted aortic valve (AVCex vivo). Explanted valves were prepared in acid solution, sonicated, and analysed with Arsenazo III dye to estimate total valve calcium and valve calcium concentration. Median AVCex vivo was 2082 (1421-2973) AU; mean valve calcium concentration was 1.43 ± 0.42 µmol Ca2+/mg tissue; median total valve calcium 156 (111-255) mg Ca2+, and valve calcium density 52 (35-81) mg/cm2. AVC displayed a strong correlation with total valve calcium (R2 = 0.98, P < 0.001) and a moderate correlation with valve calcium concentration (R2 = 0.62, P < 0.001). Valvular calcium concentration was associated with sex, aortic valve area, and mean gradient. After adjusting for age and estimated glomerular filtration rate, sex and mean gradient remained associated with valve calcium concentrations. CONCLUSION AVC score provides a strong estimate for total valve calcium but to a lesser degree calcium concentration in the valve tissue of patients with severe AS. Females presented lower valvular calcium concentrations than males irrespective of AS severity, adding evidence and providing support to the important point that sex differences in valvular calcium concentration in AS does not reflect valvular size.

[1]  R. Senior,et al.  The impact of aortic valve replacement on survival in patients with normal flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis: a propensity-matched comparison. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  M. Dweck,et al.  Why and How to Measure Aortic Valve Calcification in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  N. Marcussen,et al.  Postoperative Reverse Remodeling and Symptomatic Improvement in Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  Y. Bossé,et al.  Sex-Related Discordance Between Aortic Valve Calcification and Hemodynamic Severity of Aortic Stenosis: Is Valvular Fibrosis the Explanation? , 2017, Circulation research.

[7]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Association between aortic valve calcification measured on non-contrast computed tomography and aortic valve stenosis in the general population. , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[8]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Sex-related differences in calcific aortic stenosis: correlating clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and computed tomography aortic valve calcium score to excised aortic valve weight. , 2016, European heart journal.

[9]  P. Sengupta,et al.  Multimodality Imaging Strategies for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis: Viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) Group , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Role of Cardiac CT Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) , 2016, Current Cardiology Reports.

[11]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Valvular (18)F-Fluoride and (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake Predict Disease Progression and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Dweck,et al.  Calcification in Aortic Stenosis: The Skeleton Key. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. Michelena,et al.  Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Catherine M. Otto,et al.  Aortic-valve stenosis--from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Marie-Chloé Boulanger,et al.  Molecular biology of calcific aortic valve disease: towards new pharmacological therapies , 2014, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[18]  Y. Bossé,et al.  Elevated expression of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in calcific aortic valve disease: implications for valve mineralization. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  P. Pibarot,et al.  The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. Towler.  Molecular and cellular aspects of calcific aortic valve disease. , 2013, Circulation research.

[21]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Sex Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Aortic Stenosis , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  A. Azadani,et al.  Correlation of calcification on excised aortic valves by micro-computed tomography with severity of aortic stenosis. , 2012, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[23]  J. Gilabert.  Cytoplasmic calcium buffering. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[24]  M. Beer,et al.  Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction , 2010, Heart.

[26]  R. Autschbach,et al.  Quantification of Aortic Valve Calcification Using Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[27]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Evaluation and Clinical Implications of Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography , 2004, Circulation.

[29]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Quantification of Aortic Valve Calcification With Electron Beam Tomography: A Histomorphometric Validation Study , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[30]  D. Newby,et al.  Aortic valve calcification on computed tomography predicts the severity of aortic stenosis. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[31]  M. Borggrefe,et al.  Correlation of degree of aortic valve stenosis by Doppler echocardiogram to quantity of calcium in the valve by electron beam tomography. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  M. Schemper,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.