A Deep Learning Approach for Characterizing Major Galaxy Mergers

Fine-grained estimation of galaxy merger stages from observations is a key problem useful for validation of our current theoretical understanding of galaxy formation. To this end, we demonstrate a CNN-based regression model that is able to predict, for the first time, using a single image, the merger stage relative to the first perigee passage with a median error of 38.3 million years (Myrs) over a period of 400 Myrs. This model uses no specific dynamical modeling and learns only from simulated merger events. We show that our model provides reasonable estimates on real observations, approximately matching prior estimates provided by detailed dynamical modeling. We provide a preliminary interpretability analysis of our models, and demonstrate first steps toward calibrated uncertainty estimation.

[1]  Machine Learning from Cosmological Simulations to Identify Distant Galaxy Mergers , 2019 .

[2]  G. Chabrier Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.

[3]  C. Conselice,et al.  Observational Constraints on the Merger History of Galaxies since z ≈ 6: Probabilistic Galaxy Pair Counts in the CANDELS Fields , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  R. Teyssier Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement - A new high resolution code called RAMSES , 2001, astro-ph/0111367.

[6]  Annalisa Pillepich,et al.  The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical models , 2015, 1502.01339.

[7]  L. Wang,et al.  Identifying galaxy mergers in observations and simulations with deep learning , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[8]  S. Colombi,et al.  The origin and implications of dark matter anisotropic cosmic infall on ~L * haloes , 2004, astro-ph/0402405.

[9]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  Automated distant galaxy merger classifications from Space Telescope images using the Illustris simulation , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[10]  Carlos Hoyos,et al.  THE STRUCTURES AND TOTAL (MINOR + MAJOR) MERGER HISTORIES OF MASSIVE GALAXIES UP TO z ∼ 3 IN THE HST GOODS NICMOS SURVEY: A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE SIZE EVOLUTION PROBLEM , 2011, 1111.5662.

[11]  O. Ilbert,et al.  Horizon-AGN virtual observatory – 1. SED-fitting performance and forecasts for future imaging surveys , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[12]  P. Murdin MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY , 2005 .

[13]  Simon Prunet,et al.  Dancing in the dark: galactic properties trace spin swings along the cosmic web , 2014, 1402.1165.

[14]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Galaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers , 2008, 0805.1246.

[15]  S. Kaviraj,et al.  The Horizon-AGN simulation: evolution of galaxy properties over cosmic time , 2016, 1605.09379.

[16]  Christopher J. Conselice,et al.  Galaxy Merger Rates up to z ∼ 3 Using a Bayesian Deep Learning Model: A Major-merger Classifier Using IllustrisTNG Simulation Data , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[17]  Charles Blundell,et al.  Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles , 2016, NIPS.

[18]  Thorsten Naab,et al.  Towards an accurate model for the Antennae galaxies , 2008, 0809.5020.

[19]  A. Toomre,et al.  On the gravitational stability of a disk of stars , 1964 .

[20]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution Shifts , 2019, ICML.

[21]  Jeremiah P. Ostriker,et al.  THE COSMOLOGICAL SIZE AND VELOCITY DISPERSION EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES , 2011, 1106.5490.

[22]  Kyle R. Stewart,et al.  THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5 , 2011, 1108.2508.

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning , 2013, ICML.

[24]  G. Bruzual,et al.  Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.

[25]  Antti Rantala,et al.  The fate of the Antennae galaxies , 2017, 1709.00010.

[26]  Guillermo Barro,et al.  Compaction and quenching of high-z galaxies in cosmological simulations: blue and red nuggets , 2014, 1412.4783.

[27]  J. Blaizot,et al.  Building merger trees from cosmological N-body simulations. Towards improving galaxy formation model , 2009, 0902.0679.

[28]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.