A series of five population‐specific Indian brain templates and atlases spanning ages 6–60 years

Anatomical brain templates are commonly used as references in neurological MRI studies, for bringing data into a common space for group‐level statistics and coordinate reporting. Given the inherent variability in brain morphology across age and geography, it is important to have templates that are as representative as possible for both age and population. A representative‐template increases the accuracy of alignment, decreases distortions as well as potential biases in final coordinate reports. In this study, we developed and validated a new set of T1w Indian brain templates (IBT) from a large number of brain scans (total n = 466) acquired across different locations and multiple 3T MRI scanners in India. A new tool in AFNI, make_template_dask.py, was created to efficiently make five age‐specific IBTs (ages 6–60 years) as well as maximum probability map (MPM) atlases for each template; for each age‐group's template–atlas pair, there is both a “population‐average” and a “typical” version. Validation experiments on an independent Indian structural and functional‐MRI dataset show the appropriateness of IBTs for spatial normalization of Indian brains. The results indicate significant structural differences when comparing the IBTs and MNI template, with these differences being maximal along the Anterior–Posterior and Inferior–Superior axes, but minimal Left–Right. For each age‐group, the MPM brain atlases provide reasonably good representation of the native‐space volumes in the IBT space, except in a few regions with high intersubject variability. These findings provide evidence to support the use of age and population‐specific templates in human brain mapping studies.

[1]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  Sample sizes and population differences in brain template construction , 2020, NeuroImage.

[2]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  G. Barker,et al.  Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (cVEDA): A developmental cohort study protocol , 2020, BMC Psychiatry.

[5]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  The Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (c-VEDA): an accelerated longitudinal cohort of children and adolescents in India , 2020, Molecular Psychiatry.

[6]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ganesan Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Construction of population-specific Indian MRI brain template: Morphometric comparison with Chinese and Caucasian templates. , 2018, Asian journal of psychiatry.

[8]  A. J. Thottupattu,et al.  Construction of Indian human brain atlas , 2019, Neurology India.

[9]  et al.,et al.  The Effect of Template Choice on Morphometric Analysis of Pediatric Brain Data ☆ , 2022 .

[10]  Yingli Lu,et al.  Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  Christopher Rorden,et al.  The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  FreeSurfer , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  Phaneendra K. Yalavarthy,et al.  Population differences in brain morphology: Need for population specific brain template , 2017, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[15]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[16]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Study-specific EPI template improves group analysis in functional MRI of young and older adults , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  John E. Richards,et al.  Age-specific MRI brain and head templates for healthy adults from 20 through 89 years of age , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[18]  P. Majumder,et al.  Genomic reconstruction of the history of extant populations of India reveals five distinct ancestral components and a complex structure , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Application of Information Technology: A Four-Dimensional Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Assessment of spatial normalization of whole‐brain magnetic resonance images in children , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  A. Toga,et al.  Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis of Sulcal Variability in the Human Brain , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: A morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts , 2010, NeuroImage.

[26]  Praful P. Pai,et al.  BRAHMA: Population specific T1, T2, and FLAIR weighted brain templates and their impact in structural and functional imaging studies. , 2020, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1939 .

[28]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  FATCAT: (An Efficient) Functional And Tractographic Connectivity Analysis Toolbox , 2013, Brain Connect..

[29]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[30]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Development of Korean Standard Brain Templates , 2005, Journal of Korean medical science.