The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements

According to the equilibrium trajectory hypothesis, multi-joint arm movements are achieved by gradually shifting the hand equilibrium positions defined by the neuromuscular activity. The magnitude of the force exerted on the arm, at any time, depends on the difference between the actual and equilibrium hand positions and the stiffness and viscosity about the equilibrium position. The purpose of this paper is to test the validity and implications of this hypothesis in the context of reaching movements. A mathematical description of the behavior of an arm tracking the equilibrium trajectory was developed and implemented in computer simulations. The joint stiffness parameters used in these simulations were derived from experimentally measured static stiffness values. The kinematic features of hand equilibrium trajectories which were derived from measured planar horizontal movements gave rise to the suggestion that the generation of reaching movements involves explicit planning of spatially and temporally invariant hand equilibrium trajectories. This hypothesis was tested by simulating actual arm movements based on hypothetical equilibrium trajectories. The success of the predicted behavior in capturing both the qualitative features and the quantitative kinematic details of the measured movements supports the equilibrium trajectory hypothesis. The control strategy suggested here may allow the motor system to avoid some of the complicated computational problems associated with multi-joint arm movements.

[1]  Asatrian Dg,et al.  On the functional structure of the nervous system during movement control or preservation of a stationary posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the action of a joint during the performance of a postural task , 1965 .

[2]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Houk,et al.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  A. G. Feldman Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man , 1980, Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  C. Chandler,et al.  Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  S. Cannon,et al.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. Houk,et al.  Nonlinear viscosity of human wrist. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Georgopoulos On reaching. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  J. Murphy,et al.  Measurements of human forearm viscoelasticity. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  P. Kandela Israel , 1989, The Lancet.

[22]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  J. Soechting,et al.  The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  F. Lestienne Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  C. Ghez,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Arm trajectory formation in monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.