The Use of Cultivated Land for Multiple Functions in Major Grain-Producing Areas in Northeast China: Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Forces

The increasing scarcity of cultivated land resources necessitates the continuous change in cultivated land functions. Cultivated land has gradually changed from being used for a single function to multiple functions. The use of cultivated land for multiple functions has become an important way to achieve the sustainable use, management, and protection of cultivated land. In this, the development of different functions of cultivated land must be coordinated. Thus, clarifying the evolution trend of the use of cultivated land for various functions, calculating the coupling and coordination degrees of these multiple functions, and identifying the driving factors in these uses play important roles in realizing the orderly development of cultivated land multifunctionality. This paper defined multifunctioning cultivated land as containing a production function, a social function, and an ecological function. Based on the socioeconomic panel data and geospatial data of Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning, which are the major grain-producing areas of northeast China, in the years 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 we calculated the multiple function coupling coordination degree of cultivated land using the Coupling Coordination Degree Model and identified the driving forces in the evolution of the spatial-temporal pattern of cultivated land multifunctionality using Geodetector. The results show that from 2005 to 2020, there were significant regional differences in terms of the production, social, and ecological functions of cultivated land in the research areas. The multifunctional coupling coordination degree of cultivated land in the study areas was gradually improved. The spatial-temporal evolution of the multifunctional coupling coordination degree of cultivated land was found to mainly be influenced by the level of agricultural development, such as the level of per capita disposable income and the rate of effective irrigation of cultivated land. The government should attempt to guarantee the comparative benefits of agricultural production to increase the income level of farmers; increase investment in agricultural infrastructure construction to improve the level of agriculture development; and implement a strict farmland protection policy to achieve the continuous improvement of the productivity of cultivated land, realize the ordered development of coupling, and improve the coordination of the use of cultivated land for multiple functions. The results of this study are applicable not only to northeast China but also to other major grain-producing areas that are under pressure to protect their cultivated land and achieve the suitable use of cultivated land.

[1]  Yuefen Li,et al.  Spatiotemporal Patterns in and Key Influences on Cultivated-Land Multi-Functionality in Northeast China’s Black-Soil Region , 2022, Land.

[2]  X. Lyu,et al.  A New Framework of Green Transition of Cultivated Land-Use for the Coordination among the Water-Land-Food-Carbon Nexus in China , 2022, Land.

[3]  X. Lyu,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Influence Mechanism of Cultivated Land System Resilience: Case from China , 2021 .

[4]  G. Jiang,et al.  Towards cultivated land multifunction assessment in China: Applying the “influencing factors-functions-products-demands” integrated framework , 2020 .

[5]  Haibin Han,et al.  Exploring environmental efficiency and total factor productivity of cultivated land use in China. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  C. Parra-López,et al.  A multifunctional assessment of integrated and ecological farming in olive agroecosystems in southwestern Spain using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2020 .

[7]  Zhanqi Wang,et al.  Analysis for spatial-temporal changes of grain production and farmland resource: Evidence from Hubei Province, central China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  G. Jiang,et al.  Cultivated land productivity potential improvement in land consolidation schemes in Shenyang, China: assessment and policy implications , 2017 .

[9]  Jan Staes,et al.  The Impact of Policy Instruments on Soil Multifunctionality in the European Union , 2017 .

[10]  Zhulu Lin,et al.  Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Tonglin Zhang,et al.  A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity , 2016 .

[12]  Jian Peng,et al.  Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  M. Ejaz Qureshi,et al.  Towards food security by 2050 , 2015, Food Security.

[14]  Shan Guo,et al.  Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987–2007 , 2014 .

[15]  Tommy Klein,et al.  Adaptation options under climate change for multifunctional agriculture: a simulation study for western Switzerland , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[16]  G. Xie,et al.  Agricultural trade and virtual land use: The case of China's crop trade , 2013 .

[17]  G. Lindberg,et al.  Prospects of multifunctional agriculture as a facilitator of sustainable rural development: Swedish experience of Pillar 2 of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) , 2012 .

[18]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  A land-use and land-cover modeling strategy to support a national assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes , 2012 .

[19]  G. Siciliano,et al.  Urbanization strategies, rural development and land use changes in China: A multiple-level integrated assessment , 2012 .

[20]  Song Xiaoqing Connotation of Multifunctional Cultivated Land and Its Implications for Cultivated Land Protection , 2012 .

[21]  J D van der Ploeg,et al.  Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  J. Sheng Evaluation of ecological service value of rice-wheat rotation ecosystem: Evaluation of ecological service value of rice-wheat rotation ecosystem , 2009 .

[23]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  L. Fleskens,et al.  A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems: A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves , 2009 .

[25]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[26]  Chen Li The Social Value of Cultivated Land Resources:A Case in Liulin County of Shanxi Province , 2006 .

[27]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials , 2006 .

[28]  F. Brouwer,et al.  Multifunctionality in agriculture and the contestable public domain in the Netherlands. , 2004 .

[29]  P. Vereijken Transition to multifunctional land use and agriculture , 2003 .

[30]  Xiubing Li,et al.  Cultivated land and food supply in China. , 2000 .