Abstract This article examines discretionary leniency in police enforcement of two laws against drinking and driving in the state of Maine: a criminal law against operating under the influence of alcohol (OUI; BAC ≥ .10) and a law making it an administrative offense for teenagers to drive with BACs ≥ .02. A telephone survey of 200 randomly selected police officers showed that in the year before the survey twenty-one percent reported decisions not to apprehend and forty-two percent not to arrest drivers suspected of OUI. Nine percent of officers reported decisions not to apprehend, thirty-five percent not to request BAC tests, and thirty-five percent not to cite teenaged drivers suspected of having BACs ≥ .02. Those who reported discretionary OUI decisions did so in a mean of nineteen percent of possible apprehensions and twenty-four percent of possible arrests. Those who reported .02 discretion did so in twenty-six percent of apprehensions, fifty-one percent of possible breath tests, and fifty-two percent of possible citations. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed three predictors of decisions not to apprehend OUI suspects: beliefs that officers may have higher police priorities, that OUI jail sentences should be longer, and that OUI cases are difficult to prosecute. There were no predictors of decisions not to arrest. Officers who favored the .02 law were less likely to exercise discretionary leniency in .02 apprehensions, as were those who believed that OUI cases take too long to come to trial and those with longer police careers. Officers who felt that penalties were too severe were more likely to report discretionary decisions not to request breath tests, as were those with shorter service careers. Officers with shorter service careers reported more discretionary decisions not to cite, as did those who reported that penalties for teenaged OUI offenders are too severe.
[1]
P K Ennis,et al.
GENERAL DETERRENCE AND POLICE ENFORCEMENT: EFFECTIVE COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST DRINKING AND DRIVING?
,
1977
.
[2]
Wayne R. LaFave,et al.
Arrest : the decision to take a suspect into custody
,
1966
.
[3]
H. Laurence Ross.
Administrative License Revocation in New Mexico: An Evaluation
,
1987
.
[4]
Neal Shover,et al.
The Organization and Impact of Inspector Discretion in a Regulatory Bureaucracy
,
1983
.
[5]
J. Foley,et al.
Judicial Disobedience of the Mandate to Imprison Drunk Drivers
,
1987
.
[6]
M. Banton.
The policeman in the community
,
1965
.
[7]
Oates.
Factors influencing arrests for alcohol-related traffic violations
,
1974
.
[8]
H. Ross,et al.
Deterring the Drinking Driver: Legal Policy and Social Control.
,
1983
.
[9]
Enforcement is the Name of the Game: An Essay on the Immigration Inspector at Work
,
1978
.
[10]
A. Meyers,et al.
Effects of Maine's 1981 and Massachusetts' 1982 driving-under-the-influence legislation.
,
1987,
American journal of public health.
[11]
Ralph Hingson,et al.
Cops and drivers: Police discretion and the enforcement of Maine's 1981 OUI law
,
1987
.
[12]
D. Yates,et al.
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
,
1981,
Michigan Law Review.