Wood surfaces protected with transparent multilayer UV-cured coatings reinforced with nanosilica and nanoclay. Part I: morphological study and effect of relative humidity on adhesion strength

Multilayer coatings that are used to protect surfaces of wood components constituting ready to assemble furniture must have good adhesion to the substrate, particularly for wood furniture used in high humidity environments like bathrooms. It is not known whether adding nanoparticles to such coatings will change their properties. Surfaces of yellow birch wood (Betula alleghaniensis Britton) were protected with six different types of multilayer coatings (MCs). Prepared primer and topcoat UV-curable formulations constituting these MCs contained, respectively, hydrophobic-fumed silica (NS) and nanoclays (NC). They were added at 0 and 0.5 wt% for NS and at 0, 1, and 3 wt% for NC. The viscosity behavior of these formulations was evaluated as a function of shear rate. The morphology of the cross-section of coated wood samples was qualitatively studied by means of both scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM analysis). The adhesion strength of these MCs on wood surfaces was assessed as a function of relative humidity (RH). TEM images have revealed that topcoats reinforced with NC appear to have an intercalated (micro and nanoparticles) morphology. Statistical results have shown that NS and NS × NC do not significantly confer additional adhesion strength of MCs on wood surfaces, whereas the effect of NC is significant. The adhesion strength of coated wood samples conditioned at 80% RH was higher than that obtained on those conditioned at 40% RH. Multilayer coating # 5 ([0.5 wt% NS—1 wt% NC] combination) has been chosen as the ideal protection system for two reasons: (i) high adhesion strength at low RH and (ii) good barrier properties.

[1]  D. Kaufmann,et al.  Chemical improvement of surfaces. Part 1: Novel functional modification of wood with covalently bound organoboron compounds , 2009 .

[2]  Charles E. Hoyle,et al.  Radiation Curing of Polymeric Materials , 1990 .

[3]  H. Militz,et al.  Comparative study on penetration characteristics of modern wood coatings , 1998, Wood Science and Technology.

[4]  K.H.J. Buschow,et al.  Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology , 2004 .

[5]  R. Fernando,et al.  Scratch behavior of nano-alumina/polyurethane coatings , 2008 .

[6]  Ismail Ab Rahman,et al.  Synthesis of silica nanoparticles by sol-gel: size-dependent properties, surface modification, and applications in silica-polymer nanocomposites — a review , 2012 .

[7]  Massimo Messori,et al.  Scratch resistance of nano-silica reinforced acrylic coatings , 2008 .

[8]  P. Dubois,et al.  Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials , 2000 .

[9]  V. Landry,et al.  UV-cured clay/based nanocomposite topcoats for wood furniture. Part II: Dynamic viscoelastic behavior and effect of relative humidity on the mechanical properties , 2014 .

[10]  S. Rossi,et al.  Evaluation of aesthetic durability of waterborne polyurethane coatings applied on wood for interior applications , 2011 .

[11]  Charles J. Arntzen,et al.  Encyclopedia of agricultural science , 1994 .

[12]  M. Basri,et al.  Development of coating materials from liquid wax esters for wood top-based coating , 2011 .

[13]  M. Stevens,et al.  Effect of some formulation parameters on the penetration and adhesion of water-borne primers into wood , 2001, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[14]  D. Acierno,et al.  Rheological characterization of UV‐curable epoxy systems: Effects of o‐Boehmite nanofillers and a hyperbranched polymeric modifier , 2009 .

[15]  M. R. Kessler,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of fumed silica/cyanate ester nanocomposites , 2008 .

[16]  M. Çolakoğlu,et al.  Impact of impregnation with boron compounds on the surface hardness of varnished wood , 2007 .

[17]  T. D. Fornes,et al.  Nylon 6 nanocomposites: the effect of matrix molecular weight , 2001 .

[18]  T. Bullett,et al.  The measurement of adhesion , 1972 .

[19]  D. Kocaefe,et al.  Comparison of the protection effectiveness of acrylic polyurethane coatings containing bark extracts on three heat-treated North American wood species: Surface degradation , 2012 .

[20]  Reinhold Schwalm,et al.  UV Coatings: Basics, Recent Developments and New Applications , 2007 .

[21]  Suprakas Sinha Ray,et al.  POLYMER/LAYERED SILICATE NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW FROM PREPARATION TO PROCESSING , 2003 .

[22]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Life cycle assessment in green chemistry , 2006 .

[23]  Salim Hiziroglu,et al.  WEATHERING PROPERTIES OF WOOD SPECIES TREATED WITH DIFFERENT COATING APPLICATIONS , 2012 .

[24]  F. Ximenes,et al.  Protection of wood using oxy-aluminum compounds , 2006 .

[25]  Frank N. Jones,et al.  Organic Coatings: Science and Technology , 1992 .

[26]  R. Schwalm Introduction to Coatings Technology , 2007 .

[27]  S. Moradian,et al.  Deterministic performance parameters for an automotive polyurethane clearcoat loaded with hydrophilic or hydrophobic nano-silica , 2009 .

[28]  J. Kúdela,et al.  Study of the System Wood – Coating Material. Part 2.Wood – Solid Coating Material , 2002 .

[29]  Pierre Blanchet,et al.  Enhancing the performance of exterior waterborne coatings for wood by inorganic nanosized UV absorbers , 2010 .

[30]  André Merlin,et al.  Modification of wood wettability by plasma and corona treatments , 2000 .

[31]  Julie Cool,et al.  Evaluation of Three Surfacing Methods on Paper Birch Wood in Relation to Water- and Solvent-Borne Coating Performance , 2008 .

[32]  J. Hunt,et al.  Improvement of water resistance and dimensional stability of wood through titanium dioxide coating , 2010 .

[33]  H. Militz,et al.  ADHESION OF LOW-VOC COATINGS ON WOOD : A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[34]  I. Daniel,et al.  Mechanical and thermal behavior of clay/epoxy nanocomposites , 2006 .

[35]  Limin Wu,et al.  Development of Nanotechnology-Based Organic Coatings , 2009 .

[36]  P. Blanchet,et al.  Improved water repellency of black spruce wood surfaces after treatment in carbon tetrafluoride plasmas , 2012, Wood Science and Technology.

[37]  M. Budakçı,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE HEAT-TREATMENT ON PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF ROWAN (SORBUS AUCUPARIA L.) WOOD , 2010 .

[38]  Chenggang Chen,et al.  Fully exfoliated layered silicate epoxy nanocomposites , 2004 .

[39]  J. Winandy,et al.  From hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity: a critical review: Part I. Wettability and surface behavior. , 2010 .

[40]  P. Blanchet,et al.  UV-waterborne polyurethane-acrylate nanocomposite coatings containing alumina and silica nanoparticles for wood: mechanical, optical, and thermal properties assessment , 2011 .

[41]  Pierre Blanchet,et al.  Effect of addition of nanosized UV absorbers on the physico-mechanical and thermal properties of an exterior waterborne stain for wood , 2011 .

[42]  Pierre Blanchet,et al.  Mechanical and optical properties of clay-based nanocomposites coatings for wood flooring , 2010 .

[43]  Alex C. Wiedenhoeft,et al.  Structure and function of wood , 2012 .

[44]  Dongchoul Kim,et al.  Study on the compressive modulus of nylon-11/silica nanocomposites , 2012 .

[45]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Morphology, mechanical and optical properties of transparent BR/clay nanocomposites , 2005 .

[46]  The role of the substrate in micro-scale scratching of epoxy-polyester films , 2011 .

[47]  C. B. Friedlander,et al.  Radiation curing of organic coatings , 1983 .

[48]  T. Ladwig,et al.  Surface modified fumed silicas for modern coatings , 2000 .

[49]  R. Fernando Nanocomposite and Nanostructured Coatings: Recent Advancements , 2009 .

[50]  A. Gu,et al.  The effect of morphology on the optical properties of transparent epoxy/montmorillonite composites , 2004 .

[51]  Jeffrey W. Gilman,et al.  Characterization of Polymer-Layered Silicate (Clay) Nanocomposites by Transmission Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Diffraction: A Comparative Study , 2003 .

[52]  R. E. Florin,et al.  Radiation Curing of Coatings , 1984 .

[53]  A. Bhattacharya Radiation and industrial polymers , 2000 .

[54]  M. Frigione,et al.  UV-cured polymer-boehmite nanocomposite as protective coating for wood elements , 2012 .

[55]  R. Clough High-energy radiation and polymers: A review of commercial processes and emerging applications , 2001 .

[56]  R. Bongiovanni,et al.  High performance UV-cured coatings for wood protection , 2002 .

[57]  P. Blanchet,et al.  Nanoclay dispersion effects on UV coatings curing , 2008 .

[58]  V. Landry,et al.  UV-cured clay/based nanocomposite topcoats for wood furniture: Part I: Morphological study, water vapor transmission rate and optical clarity , 2014 .

[59]  Enrico Boccaleri,et al.  Synthetic, layered nanoparticles for polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs) , 2007 .

[60]  R. Hernández,et al.  Evaluation of varnish coating performance for three surfacing methods on sugar maple wood , 2007 .

[61]  A. Okada,et al.  Twenty Years of Polymer‐Clay Nanocomposites , 2006 .

[62]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  UV curable epoxy acrylate–clay nanocomposites , 2006 .

[63]  R. Joseph,et al.  Nanotechnology-A New Prospective in Organic Coating - Review , 2011 .

[64]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[65]  D. Wicks,et al.  Color and Appearance , 2001 .

[66]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and Function of , 2005 .