THE WAY FORWARD FOR ASSESSING THE HUMAN HEALTH SAFETY OF COSMETICS IN THE EU

LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain.

[1]  Paul Walker,et al.  Identifying and Characterizing Stress Pathways of Concern for Consumer Safety in Next-Generation Risk Assessment , 2020, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Thomas E Moxon,et al.  Application of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling in the next generation risk assessment of dermally applied consumer products. , 2019, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  J. Dorne,et al.  Testing the Thresholds of Toxicological Concern Values Using a New Database for Food-Related Substances. , 2019, Toxicology letters.

[4]  Alberto Manganaro,et al.  Integrating in silico models for the prediction of mutagenicity (Ames test) of botanical ingredients of cosmetics , 2019, Computational Toxicology.

[5]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  Integrating in silico models and read-across methods for predicting toxicity of chemicals: A step-wise strategy. , 2019, Environment international.

[6]  Gopal Pawar,et al.  In Silico Toxicology Data Resources to Support Read-Across and (Q)SAR , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[7]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  Dosimetry considerations for in vivo and in vitro test data and a novel surrogate iTTC approach for read-across based on metabolites , 2019, Computational Toxicology.

[8]  Andrea-Nicole Richarz,et al.  Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[9]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Challenges in working towards an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC) for use in the safety assessment of cosmetics: Discussions from the Cosmetics Europe iTTC Working Group workshop , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  K. Krishnan,et al.  Derivation of internal dose-based thresholds of toxicological concern for occupational inhalation exposure to systemically acting organic chemicals , 2019, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Ann M Richard,et al.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. , 2019, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in read-across: Questions to evaluate toxicity predictions based on knowledge gained from case studies , 2019, Computational Toxicology.

[13]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Guidance on Communication of Uncertainty in Scientific Assessments , 2019, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[14]  Hequn Li,et al.  Employing Dietary Comparators to Perform Risk Assessments for Anti-Androgens Without Using Animal Data , 2018, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Principles underpinning the use of new methodologies in the risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients , 2018, Computational Toxicology.

[16]  Bertrand Desprez,et al.  A strategy for systemic toxicity assessment based on non-animal approaches: The Cosmetics Europe Long Range Science Strategy programme. , 2018, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[17]  Chihae Yang,et al.  Dempster-Shafer theory for combining in silico evidence and estimating uncertainty in chemical risk assessment , 2018 .

[18]  Anthony Hardy,et al.  Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments , 2018, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[19]  S. More,et al.  The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment , 2018, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[20]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for cosmetics-related substances: New database, thresholds, and enrichment of chemical space. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[21]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Ab initio chemical safety assessment: A workflow based on exposure considerations and non-animal methods , 2017, Computational toxicology.

[22]  T. Luechtefeld,et al.  The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[23]  Terry W Schultz,et al.  Lessons learned from read-across case studies for repeated-dose toxicity. , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  Matthias Greiner,et al.  Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments , 2017, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[25]  N. Hewitt,et al.  Suitability of the in vitro Caco-2 assay to predict the oral absorption of aromatic amine hair dyes. , 2016, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[26]  T. Baker,et al.  Extrapolation of systemic bioavailability assessing skin absorption and epidermal and hepatic metabolism of aromatic amine hair dyes in vitro. , 2015, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[27]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[28]  G. L. Kedderis,et al.  Use of in vitro data in developing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: Carbaryl as a case study. , 2015, Toxicology.

[29]  S. Barlow,et al.  Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[30]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  An exposure:activity profiling method for interpreting high-throughput screening data for estrogenic activity--proof of concept. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[31]  Timothy E H Allen,et al.  Defining molecular initiating events in the adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment. , 2014, Chemical research in toxicology.

[32]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  Sean M Hays,et al.  Interpreting estrogen screening assays in the context of potency and human exposure relative to natural exposures to phytoestrogens. , 2014, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[34]  H. Rothe,et al.  Introduction of a methoxymethyl side chain into p-phenylenediamine attenuates its sensitizing potency and reduces the risk of allergy induction. , 2014, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[35]  M. T. D. Cronin,et al.  Chapter 1:An Introduction to Chemical Grouping, Categories and Read-Across to Predict Toxicity , 2013 .

[36]  Irene M. Baskerville-Abraham,et al.  Correlation of chemical structure with reproductive and developmental toxicity as it relates to the use of the threshold of toxicological concern. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[37]  H. Buist,et al.  Improvement of the Cramer classification for oral exposure using the database TTC RepDose--a strategy description. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[38]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  Application of transcriptional benchmark dose values in quantitative cancer and noncancer risk assessment. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[39]  Cameron MacKay,et al.  Determining epidermal disposition kinetics for use in an integrated nonanimal approach to skin sensitization risk assessment. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[40]  A. Aptula,et al.  Read‐across to rank skin sensitization potential: subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain , 2009, Contact dermatitis.

[41]  Helmut Greim,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[42]  Christos P. Kitsos,et al.  Recent advances in quantitative methods in cancer and human health risk assessment , 2006 .

[43]  Xiangqin Cui,et al.  Exploration of low-dose estrogen effects: identification of No Observed Transcriptional Effect Level (NOTEL). , 2004, Toxicologic pathology.

[44]  R. Kroes.  Structure-Based Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC): Guidance for Application to Substances Present at Low Levels in the Diet , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[45]  J. Fisher,et al.  Effect of neonatal exposure to estrogenic compounds on development of the excurrent ducts of the rat testis through puberty to adulthood. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[46]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[47]  I C Munro,et al.  Safety assessment procedures for indirect food additives: an overview. Report of a workshop. , 1990, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[48]  W. Russell,et al.  The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique , 1960 .

[49]  Eurl Ecvam.  EURL ECVAM Status Report on the Development, Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Alternative Methods and Approaches (2015) , 2022 .

[50]  Matthias Stefan Eggel,et al.  The logic, methodological and practical limitations in the current benefit concept in the harm-benefit-analysis : an investigation in the context of the EU directive 2010/63 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes , 2018 .

[51]  R. Slama,et al.  Memorandum on weight of evidence and uncertainties Revision 2018 , 2018 .

[52]  M. Cronin,et al.  Read-Across of 90-day Rat Oral Repeated-Dose Toxicity: A Case Study for Selected n-Alkanols , 2017 .

[53]  Guideline on the qualification and reporting of 4 physiologically based pharmacokinetic ( PBPK ) modelling 5 and simulation , 2016 .

[54]  Review of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach and development of new TTC decision tree , 2016 .

[55]  Claire L. Mellor,et al.  Graphical Abstract Read-Across of 90-Day Rat Oral Repeated-Dose Toxicity: A Case Study for Selected β-olefinic Alcohols , 2016 .

[56]  Marco Giannetto,et al.  Reliability of the TTC approach: learning from inclusion of pesticide active substances in the supporting database. , 2015, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[57]  THE TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL , 2014 .

[58]  S. Pfuhler,et al.  N-acetylation of three aromatic amine hair dye precursor molecules eliminates their genotoxic potential. , 2014, Mutagenesis.

[59]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Chemical toxicity prediction : category formation and read-across , 2013 .

[60]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[61]  H. Kalkhof,et al.  Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[62]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .