How Patient Reactions to Hospital Care Attributes Affect the Evaluation of Overall Quality of Care, Willingness to Recommend, and Willingness to Return

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Patient satisfaction is a critical part of the quality outcomes of healthcare. Every industry is interested in customer satisfaction because satisfied customers are loyal customers. Healthcare is no exception. Many research studies assume that satisfied patients are more likely to recommend their providers to their friends and to return when they need care again. Although this assumption sounds logical, we argue that three dependent variables—the Evaluation of Overall Quality of Care, Willingness to Recommend, and Willingness to Return—are unique constructs. Thus, we examine how patient reactions (experiences) to different hospital care attributes (factors or dimensions) influence these dependent variables. Our study analyzed a comprehensive patient satisfaction data set collected by BJC HealthCare. We used a multiple linear regression model with a scatter term to analyze 14,432 cases. In Evaluation of Overall Quality of Care model, we found that the nursing care attribute showed the strongest influence, followed by staff care. In assessing the other two models—Willingness to Recommend and Willingness to Return—we found that staff care showed the strongest influence, followed by nursing care. Patients put a different emphasis or a different priority on their reactions to hospital care attributes, depending on which outcome they arrive at. In addition, we found that patients are disproportionately influenced by a weak or poor attribute reaction, which is a conjunctive strategy (risk averse). In general, nursing care and staff care should be the first priority for improvement. This may be good news because these areas are under the control of hospital managers.

[1]  Robert M. Guion,et al.  The Prediction of Judgment in Realistic Tasks: An Investigation of Self-Insight , 2000 .

[2]  J. Sitzia,et al.  Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Lynne D. Richardson,et al.  Healthscapes: The role of the facility and physical environment on consumer attitudes, satisfaction, quality assessments, and behaviors , 1995, Health care management review.

[4]  J. Haas,et al.  Willingness to recommend a health plan: who is dissatisfied and what don't they like? , 2004, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[6]  A. Davies,et al.  Understanding patient willingness to recommend and return: a strategy for prioritizing improvement opportunities. , 1999, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[8]  M Peyrot,et al.  Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality of outpatient health services. , 1993, Journal of health care marketing.

[9]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation , 1989 .

[10]  T. Burroughs,et al.  Reconsidering Models of Patient Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions , 2003, Health care management review.

[11]  Diane H. Parente,et al.  A Pre-Post Comparison of Service Operational Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction Under Open Access Scheduling , 2005, Health Care Management Review.

[12]  K. Otani Enrollees' Global Rating Process of Health Care with the National CAHPS® Benchmarking Database , 2006, Health care management review.

[13]  Mardge H. Cohen,et al.  Longitudinal relationships between use of highly active antiretroviral therapy and satisfaction with care among women living with HIV/AIDS. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[14]  A. Woodside,et al.  Linking service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. , 1989, Journal of health care marketing.

[15]  Yoav Ganzach Goals as Determinants of Nonlinear Noncompensatory Judgment Strategies: Leniency vs Strictness , 1993 .

[16]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Nonlinear and Noncompensatory Models in User Information Satisfaction Measurement , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  José Maria Paganni,et al.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[18]  W. Tierney,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in Patient Satisfaction Assessment , 2003, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[19]  Upstream or Downstream: Determinants of Consumer Willingness to Recommend an HMO , 2003, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[20]  R. Ford,et al.  Methods of Measuring Patient Satisfaction in Health Care Organizations , 1997, Health care management review.

[21]  A. Woodside,et al.  Customer awareness and preferences toward competing hospital services. , 1988, Journal of health care marketing.

[22]  F. Oort,et al.  Medical Specialists’ Patient-Centered Communication and Patient-Reported Outcomes , 2007, Medical care.

[23]  T Chandola,et al.  Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[24]  E J Orav,et al.  Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  L. E. Harris,et al.  Different Integration Processes of Patient Satisfaction Among Four Groups , 2004, Health care management review.

[26]  S. Boslaugh,et al.  Patient Satisfaction: Focusing on “Excellent” , 2009, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[27]  Kyun Jick Lee,et al.  A Practical Method of Predicting Client Revisit Intention in a Hospital Setting , 2005, Health care management review.

[28]  B. Williams Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[29]  J Singh A multifacet typology of patient satisfaction with a hospital stay. , 1990, Journal of health care marketing.

[30]  T. Burroughs,et al.  Patient satisfaction measurement strategies: a comparison of phone and mail methods. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.