Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications.

Dynamic elastic response foot and ankle prostheses (Seattle-Lite, Flex Foot, etc.) used by transtibial amputees feature substantial design improvements over conventional designs (SACH, Single Axis, etc.). Despite this progress, transtibial amputees continue to expend greater energy than normals. Increased residual limb EMG data and altered gait patterns suggest that impaired mobility may be the cause of overactive muscles in early stance. Prosthetic mobility was therefore quantified by measuring foot, shank and thigh velocities in nine transtibial amputees, wearing three different foot designs: Single Axis (SA), Seattle Lite (SL) and Flex Foot (FF). The magnitude, timing and rate of segment velocities for each prosthetic design, characterizing early stance mobility, were compared with corresponding measures in normal, nonamputee (NA) controls using Dunnett's test. Regardless of foot type, transtibial (TT) amputees walked slower than non amputee controls (63.3-65.8 m/min versus 78.5 m/min, p < 0.05) and their stride length was shorter (1.21-1.26 m versus 1.41 m, p < 0.01). In early stance, peak foot and shank velocities were lower (p < 0.01) for both the SL and FF while only shank velocity was lower (p < 0.01) with the SA compared to NA controls. Significant delays in the timing of early stance events such as peak shank velocity, peak ankle plantarflexion and peak knee flexion compromised shank and knee stability in TT amputees. Foot and shank mobility was uncontrolled with the SA design while ankle mobility was restricted by the FF and SL feet. In NA controls on the other hand, appropriate timing and rate of segment velocity changes preserved dynamic stability and forward progression in early stance. This was evidenced by rapid decreases in foot and shank velocity as the thigh velocity increased during weight acceptance. Future prosthetic designs should provide TT amputees with improved ankle mobility that attempt to capture the dynamic characteristics of a normal articulation between the foot and shank segments during the early stance weight acceptance period.

[1]  H. Woltring 3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J Perry,et al.  Efficiency of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Gerald A. Smith,et al.  Padding point extrapolation techniques for the Butterworth digital filter. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. Shurr,et al.  Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .

[6]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  G L Kinzel,et al.  Measurement of the total motion between two body segments. I. Analytical development. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J E Edelstein Prosthetic feet. State of the Art. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[9]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  J Perry,et al.  The influence of lower-extremity muscle force on gait characteristics in individuals with below-knee amputations secondary to vascular disease. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[11]  E. Ayyappa,et al.  Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Perry,et al.  Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  E. Culham,et al.  Below-Knee Amputation: A Comparison of the Effect of the Sach Foot and Single Axis Foot on Electromyographic Patterns During Locomotion , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[14]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .