Interim Performance Feedback in Multistage Tournaments: The Optimality of Partial Disclosure

Workers competing in a tournament for a prize (e.g., a promotion) often perform sequentially in multiple stages. When the firm is privately informed about the workers’ performance, it can sharpen incentives by strategically disclosing the intermediate results. But the policies that enhance final-stage effort may dampen incentives at the intermediate stage. In our model, the optimal disclosure policy has a simple form: disclose only if all workers perform poorly. This result offers a novel justification for partial disclosure in performance feedback. Also, it contrasts with the existing literature that focuses on the extreme policies of full disclosure and no disclosure.

[1]  M. Peiperl,et al.  Getting 360 degrees feedback right. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[2]  J. Ellis,et al.  Performance appraisals. , 1989, RNABC news.

[3]  Masaki Aoyagi Information Feedback in a Dynamic Tournament , 2003 .

[4]  J. Münster,et al.  Communication and Commitment in Contests , 2011 .

[5]  J Noak,et al.  Performance rating. , 1999, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[6]  Bin R. Chen,et al.  Interim Performance Evaluation in Contract Design , 2011 .

[7]  H. Carmichael,et al.  The Agent-Agents Problem: Payment by Relative Output , 1983, Journal of Labor Economics.

[8]  Michael Waldman,et al.  The Signaling Role of Promotions: Further Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2012, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  John Geanakoplos,et al.  Grading Exams: 100, 99, 98,...Or A, B, C? , 2004 .

[10]  Julia Nafziger,et al.  Information Management and Incentives , 2013 .

[11]  Stefan Terstiege,et al.  Objective versus Subjective Performance Evaluations , 2013 .

[12]  Corporate Tournaments, Human Capital Acquisition, and the Firm Size-Wage Relation , 2001 .

[13]  Sidartha Gordon Publishing to Deter in R&D Competition1 , 2003 .

[14]  Huseyin Yildirim,et al.  Contests with multiple rounds , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Margaret Meyer,et al.  Learning from Coarse Information: Biased Contests and Career Profiles , 1991 .

[16]  Nancy L. Stokey,et al.  A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Job Assignments, Signalling, and Efficiency , 1984 .

[18]  W. MacLeod,et al.  On Optimal Contracting with Subjective Evaluation , 2001 .

[19]  William Fuchs,et al.  Contracting with Repeated Moral Hazard and Private Evaluations , 2006 .

[20]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Up-or-Out Contracts: A Signaling Perspective , 1990, Journal of Labor Economics.

[21]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Preemption, Leapfrogging, and Co­mpetition in Patent Races , 1983 .

[22]  Cynthia Van Hulle,et al.  A note on adverse selection in the labour market , 1987 .

[23]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  Prices and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition , 1983 .

[24]  Florian Ederer,et al.  Feedback and Motivation in Dynamic Tournaments , 2010 .

[25]  A. Mangwendeza,et al.  Performance appraisal. , 2000, Nursing management.

[26]  Anders U. Poulsen,et al.  Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[27]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[28]  Motty Perry,et al.  Tournaments with midterm reviews , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[29]  Pradeep Dubey,et al.  Grading Exams: 100, 99, ..., 1, or a, B, C? , 2004 .

[30]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  The Incentive Effects of Interim Performance Evaluations , 2002 .

[31]  Masaki Aoyagi,et al.  Information Feedback in a Dynamic Tournament , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[32]  Clopper Almon Matrix methods in economics , 1967 .

[33]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[34]  Lorne Carmichael,et al.  Firm-Specific Human Capital and Promotion Ladders , 1983 .

[35]  Margaret Meyer,et al.  Biased Contests and Moral Hazard: Implications for Career Profiles , 1992 .

[36]  Dan Moreau,et al.  A, B and C , 2010 .

[37]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. , 1989 .

[38]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  P. Bag,et al.  Double-edged transparency in teams , 2011 .

[40]  W. Clay Hamner,et al.  How to Ruin Motivation with Pay , 1975 .

[41]  Michael J. Gibbs AN ECONOMIC APPROACH TO PROCESS IN PAY AND PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS , 2001 .

[42]  J. Vickers,et al.  Racing with Uncertainty , 1987 .

[43]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Rank-Order Contracts for a Principal with Many Agents , 1986 .

[44]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives , 1995 .

[45]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  Ján Zábojník Subjective Evaluations with Performance Feedback , 2013 .