Transverse connectors providing increased stability to the cervical spine rod-screw construct: an in vitro human cadaveric study.

OBJECT The object of this study was to determine if the addition of transverse connectors (TCs) to a rod-screw construct leads to increased stabilization of the cervical spine. METHODS Eleven human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were used to examine the effect of adding connectors to a C3-7 rod-screw construct in 3 models of instability: 1) C3-6 wide laminectomy, 2) wide laminectomy and 50% foraminotomy at C4-5 and C5-6, and 3) wide laminectomy with full medial to lateral foraminotomy. Following each destabilization procedure, specimens were tested with no TC, 1 TC between the C-5 screws, and 2 TCs between the C-4 and C-6 screws. Testing of the connectors was conducted in random order. Specimens were subjected to ± 2 Nm of torque in flexion and extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion was determined for each experimental condition. Statistical comparisons were made between the destabilized and intact conditions, and between the addition of TCs and the absence of TCs. RESULTS The progressive destabilization procedures significantly increased motion. The addition of TCs did not significantly change motion in flexion and extension. Lateral bending was significantly decreased with 2 connectors, but not with 1 connector. The greatest effect was on axial rotation. In general, 2 TCs were more restrictive than 1 TC, and decreased motion 10% more than fixation alone. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the degree of cervical destabilization, 1 or 2 TCs decreased motion compared with rods and screws alone. Axial rotation was most affected. Transverse connectors effectively increase the rigidity of rod-screw constructs in the cervical spine. Severe cervical instability can be overcome with the use of 2 TCs, but in cases in which 2 cannot be used, 1 should be adequate and superior to none.

[1]  Warren D. Yu,et al.  Posterior-only Stabilization of 2-column and 3-column Injuries at the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Biomechanical Study , 2009, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  R. Lehman,et al.  Biomechanical Contribution of Transverse Connectors to Segmental Stability Following Long Segment Instrumentation With Thoracic Pedicle Screws , 2008, Spine.

[3]  R. Lehman,et al.  Stabilizing Potential of Anterior, Posterior, and Circumferential Fixation for Multilevel Cervical Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Study of the Operative and Adjacent Segment Kinematics , 2007, Spine.

[4]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Sagittal plane motion in the human lumbar spine: comparison of the in vitro quasistatic neutral zone and dynamic motion parameters. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Denis J. DiAngelo,et al.  Motion Compensation Associated With Single-Level Cervical Fusion: Where Does the Lost Motion Go? , 2006, Spine.

[6]  L. Sekhon Posterior Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Analysis of 1026 Consecutive Screws in 143 Patients , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[7]  A. Valdevit,et al.  Torsional stability of cross-link configurations: a biomechanical analysis. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in Primary Fusions for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[9]  R. Wharen,et al.  Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of New Posterior Occipitocervical Instrumentation System , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Screw Fixation in Cadaveric Cervical Spines , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Posterior cervical fixation using a new polyaxial screw and rod system: technique and surgical results. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load–Displacement Curves , 2001, Spine.

[14]  Howard S. An,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Diagonal Fixation in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation , 2001, Spine.

[15]  K. Bachus,et al.  Segmental pedicle screw fixation or cross-links in multilevel lumbar constructs. a biomechanical analysis. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[16]  H. Mihara,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Cervical Fixation , 2001, Spine.

[17]  M. Arand,et al.  Internal fixation on the lower cervical spine – biomechanics and clinical practice of procedures and implants , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[18]  Thomas R. Oxland,et al.  Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density , 1998 .

[19]  B L Currier,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cervical Stabilization After a Wide Laminectomy , 1997, Spine.

[20]  R. N. Kruse,et al.  Mechanical Stability of Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation: The Effect of Crosslinks , 1997, Spine.

[21]  D. Silcox,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws Versus Lateral Mass Screws: Anatomic Feasibility and Biomechanical Comparison , 1997, Spine.

[22]  D. Kunz,et al.  Mechanical Evaluation of Cross‐Link Designs in Rigid Pedicle Screw Systems , 1997, Spine.

[23]  H. An,et al.  Posterior Cervical Fixation for Fracture and Degenerative Disc Disease , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  R. E. Kinard,et al.  Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis and Stabilization With a Lateral Mass Plate: Clinical and Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Lateral Mass Screw Placement and Associated Complications , 1996, Spine.

[25]  D. Silcox,et al.  Complications of Posterior Cervical Plating , 1995, Spine.

[26]  J. Lotz,et al.  Instrumentation of the Cervicothoracic Junction After Destabilization , 1995, Spine.

[27]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  D. Grob,et al.  Clinical Validation of Functional Flexion/Extension Radiographs of the Cervical Spine , 1993, Spine.

[29]  R. Raynor,et al.  Cervical Spine Strength After Facet Injury and Spine Plate Application , 1991, Spine.

[30]  H. An,et al.  Anatomic Considerations for Plate‐Screw Fixation of the Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.

[31]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Fred H. Geisler,et al.  Titanium wire internal fixation for stabilization of injury of the cervical spine: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[33]  F. Geisler,et al.  Use of titanium wire in cervical spine fixation as a means to reduce MR artifacts. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  M. Asher,et al.  A Modular Spinal Rod Linkage System to Provide Rotational Stability , 1988, Spine.

[35]  J. Corin,et al.  MECHANICAL TESTING OF SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  J Dubousset,et al.  NEW UNIVERSAL INSTRUMENTATION IN SPINAL SURGERY , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three‐dimensional load‐displacement curves due to froces on the cervical spine , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[38]  R B Raynor,et al.  Cervical facetectomy and its effect on spine strength. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[39]  G. Saillant,et al.  [Vertebral osteosynthesis using metal plates. Its different uses (author's transl)]. , 1979, Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie.