Subspace identification of closed loop systems by the orthogonal decomposition method

In this paper, we consider a problem of identifying the deterministic part of a closed loop system by applying the stochastic realization technique of (Signal Process. 52 (2) (1996) 145) in the framework of the joint input-output approach. Using a preliminary orthogonal decomposition, the problem is reduced to that of identifying the plant and controller based on the deterministic component of the joint input-output process. We discuss the role of input signals in closed loop identification and the realization method based on a finite data, and then sketch a subspace method for identifying state space models of the plant and controller. Since the obtained models are of higher order, a model reduction procedure should be applied for deriving lower order models. Some numerical results are included to show the applicability of the present technique.

[1]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Analysis of the asymptotic properties of the MOESP type of subspace algorithms , 2000, Autom..

[2]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Closed-loop identification using canonical correlation analysis , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[3]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[4]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Application of a subspace model identification technique to identify LTI systems operating in closed-loop , 1993, Autom..

[5]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS BY STOCHASTIC REALIZATION , 2002 .

[6]  T. Katayama,et al.  A subspace identification of deterministic part of state space model operating in closed-loop , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[7]  B. De Moor,et al.  Closed loop subspace system identification , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Consistency analysis of closed-loop subspace identification , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[9]  G. Rota.  Stationary random processes associated with point processes , 1985 .

[10]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[11]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-output data , 1994, Autom..

[12]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  On Consistency of Subspace Methods for System Identification , 1998, Autom..

[13]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Subspace identification from closed loop data , 1996, Signal Process..

[14]  A. C. van der Klauw,et al.  State space identification of closed loop systems , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  Stochastic realization with exogenous inputs and 'subspace-methods' identification , 1996, Signal Process..

[16]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  An indirect method for transfer function estimation from closed loop data , 1993, Autom..

[17]  B. Moor,et al.  Closed loop subspace system identification , 1997 .

[18]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  Realization of stochastic systems with exogenous inputs and subspace identification methods , 1999, Autom..

[19]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Constructing the state of random processes with feedback , 2003 .

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-loop identification revisited , 1999, Autom..

[21]  E. J. Hannan,et al.  Unit canonical correlations between future and past , 1988 .

[22]  A. Varga.  On Balancing and Order Reduction of Unstable Periodic Systems , 2001 .

[23]  Paul M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  Closed-Loop Issues in System Identification , 1997 .

[24]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Asymptotic properties of subspace estimators , 2005, Autom..

[25]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[26]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Some Algorithmic aspects of Subspace Identification with Inputs , 2001 .