Impacts of Reclassified Brown Coal Reserves on the Energy System and Deep Decarbonisation Target in the Czech Republic

In 2015, a 24-year-long prohibition of coal mining within some territories in the North Bohemia coal basin was lifted and as a consequence mining a part of the brown coal reserves might well be resumed. This paper analyses the impacts of maintaining the ban versus three options for a less environmentally stringent policy on the Czech energy system; fuel- and technology-mix, the costs of generating energy, emissions and related external costs up to 2050. We find that overall the effect of lifting the ban, on coal usage, air pollutant emissions and hence externalities is rather small, up to 1–2% compared to the level of keeping the ban. The small difference in the impacts remains even if changes in the prices of fossil fuels and European Emission Allowances or different development in nuclear power usage are assumed. In fact, changing these assumptions will result in more pronounced differences in the impacts than the four policy options might deliver. Maintaining the ban would not achieve the European Energy Roadmap 2050 target and the newly adopted policy and the other two counter-environmental proposals would miss the 80% reduction target to an even greater degree. The environmental and external health costs attributable to emissions of local air pollutants stemming from power generation are in a range of €26–32 billion over the whole period and decline from about 0.5% of gross domestic product in 2015 to 0.1% in 2050.

[1]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Documentation for the TIMES Model PART III , 2016 .

[2]  James Price,et al.  Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models , 2017 .

[3]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability , 2006 .

[4]  Analýza dopadů regulace v českém elektroenergetickém systému - aplikace dynamického lineárního modelu Message , 2013 .

[5]  Jan Urban,et al.  Structure of Domestic Energy Saving , 2016 .

[6]  Birgit Fais,et al.  Impact of technology uncertainty on future low-carbon pathways in the UK , 2016 .

[7]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models , 2016 .

[8]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries , 2012 .

[9]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions? , 2018 .

[10]  Claudia Kemfert,et al.  Market Driven Power Plant Investment Perspectives in Europe: Climate Policy and Technology Scenarios until 2050 in the Model EMELIE-ESY , 2013 .

[11]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Incorporating travel behaviour and travel time into TIMES energy system models , 2014 .

[12]  Jan Weinzettel,et al.  A consumption-based indicator of the external costs of electricity , 2012 .

[13]  R. Loulou,et al.  Documentation for the TIMES Model PART I April 2005 , 2005 .

[14]  F. Kunz,et al.  Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050 , 2013 .

[15]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Brown coal and nuclear energy deployment: Effects on fuel-mix, carbon targets, and external costs in the Czech Republic up to 2050 , 2018 .

[16]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Monetary and Non-Monetary Measures of Health Benefits from Exposure Reduction , 2016 .

[17]  A. Klimešová,et al.  Consumer loss in Czech photovoltaic power plants in 2010–2011 , 2013 .

[18]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Description of models and scenarios used to assess European decarbonisation pathways , 2014 .

[19]  Patrícia Fortes,et al.  Assessing the cost-effectiveness of electric vehicles in European countries using integrated modeling , 2015 .

[20]  Gustav Resch,et al.  2030 RES targets for Europea brief pre-assessment of feasibility and impacts , 2014 .

[21]  Hana Gerbelová,et al.  Electricity decarbonisation pathways for 2050 in Portugal: A TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System) based approach in closed versus open systems modelling , 2014 .

[22]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Sensitivity to energy technology costs: a multi-model comparison analysis. , 2015 .

[23]  Eagle Glassheim Ethnic Cleansing, Communism, and Environmental Devastation in Czechoslovakia's Borderlands, 1945–1989* , 2006, The Journal of Modern History.

[24]  Jan Melichar,et al.  The Health Costs of Revised Coal Mining Limits in Northern Bohemia , 2016 .

[25]  Semida Silveira,et al.  OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System: An introduction to its ethos, structure and development , 2011 .

[26]  M. Kirkengen,et al.  The role of the discount rates in energy systems optimisation models , 2016 .

[27]  Weilong Huang,et al.  TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: Comparisons from a decarbonization perspective☆ , 2016 .

[28]  L. Vandevelde,et al.  Towards low carbon business park energy systems: Classification of techno-economic energy models , 2014 .

[29]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Impacts of carbon pricing, brown coal availability and gas cost on Czech energy system up to 2050 , 2016 .

[30]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Targets for global climate policy: an overview , 2013 .

[31]  Edi Assoumou,et al.  Sub-national TIMES model for analyzing future regional use of biomass and biofuels in Sweden and France , 2013 .

[32]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  A Canadian 2050 energy outlook: Analysis with the multi-regional model TIMES-Canada , 2013 .

[33]  Competitive low carbon economy in 2050 , 2013 .