Quality and safety implications of emergency department information systems.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services "meaningful use" incentive programs, in tandem with the boundless additional requirements for detailed reporting of quality metrics, have galvanized hospital efforts to implement hospital-based electronic health records. As such, emergency department information systems (EDISs) are an important and unique component of most hospitals' electronic health records. System functionality varies greatly and affects physician decisionmaking, clinician workflow, communication, and, ultimately, the overall quality of care and patient safety. This article is a joint effort by members of the Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Section and the Informatics Section of the American College of Emergency Physicians. The aim of this effort is to examine the benefits and potential threats to quality and patient safety that could result from the choice of a particular EDIS, its implementation and optimization, and the hospital's or physician group's approach to continuous improvement of the EDIS. Specifically, we explored the following areas of potential EDIS safety concerns: communication failure, wrong order-wrong patient errors, poor data display, and alert fatigue. Case studies are presented that illustrate the potential harm that could befall patients from an inferior EDIS product or suboptimal execution of such a product in the clinical environment. The authors have developed 7 recommendations to improve patient safety with respect to the deployment of EDISs. These include ensuring that emergency providers actively participate in selection of the EDIS product, in the design of processes related to EDIS implementation and optimization, and in the monitoring of the system's ongoing success or failure. Our recommendations apply to emergency departments using any type of EDIS: custom-developed systems, best-of-breed vendor systems, or enterprise systems.

[1]  Jane M. Brokel,et al.  Professional Practice and Innovation: Transformation of Emergency Department Processes of Care with EHR, CPOE, and ER Event Tracking Systems , 2009, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[2]  J. Sidorov It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs. , 2006, Health affairs.

[3]  Michael D. Greenberg,et al.  Too Many Alerts, Too Much Liability: Sorting Through the Malpractice Implications of Drug-Drug Interaction Clinical Decision Support , 2012 .

[4]  David A. Kreda,et al.  Health care information technology vendors' "hold harmless" clause: implications for patients and clinicians. , 2009, JAMA.

[5]  D. Coplen Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2007 .

[6]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  An empirical model to estimate the potential impact of medication safety alerts on patient safety, health care utilization, and cost in ambulatory care. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Thomas R. Yackel,et al.  Case report: Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Rollin J. Fairbanks,et al.  Interface Design Characteristics of a Popular Emergency Department Information System , 2008 .

[9]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[10]  Andy Podgurski,et al.  Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts: Emphasizing the Evidence , 2012 .

[11]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  The Value of Electronic Health Records , 2005 .

[12]  G. Petersson,et al.  Usability of computerised physician order entry in primary care: assessing ePrescribing with a new evaluation model. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[13]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Strategic directions in human-computer interaction , 1996, CSUR.

[14]  Jonathan B Kruskal,et al.  Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department. , 2012, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Improving a human-computer dialogue , 1990, CACM.

[16]  Why Electronic Health Record Systems Require Safety Regulation , 2009 .

[17]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. , 2013, Health affairs.

[18]  I. Kohane,et al.  Escaping the EHR trap--the future of health IT. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R. Wears,et al.  Using information technology to improve the quality and safety of emergency care. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[20]  Charles E. Leonard,et al.  Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  Robert L Wears,et al.  Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[23]  Spencer S Jones,et al.  Unraveling the IT productivity paradox--lessons for health care. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[25]  Don E. Detmer,et al.  Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  B. Bloom Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[27]  W. Cordell,et al.  Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[28]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Review Paper: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Comparative User Experiences of Health IT Products: How User Experiences Would Be Reported and Used , 2012 .

[30]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Vivian Vimarlund,et al.  Health Information System Implementation: A Qualitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Medical Systems.

[32]  Jeffrey M. Weiss,et al.  Understanding and preventing wrong-patient electronic orders: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[33]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[34]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  A Human Factors Guide to Enhance EHR Usability of Critical User Interactions when Supporting Pediatric Patient Care. , 2012 .

[35]  D. Chou Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care , 2012 .