Identifying the critical parameters of a cyanobacterial growth and movement model by using generalised sensitivity analysis

Bloom-forming and toxin-producing cyanobacteria remain a persistent nuisance across the world. Modelling of cyanobacteria in freshwaters is an important tool for understanding their population dynamics and predicting the location and timing of the bloom events in lakes and rivers. A new deterministic-mathematical model was developed, which simulates the growth and movement of cyanobacterial blooms in river systems. The model focuses on the mathematical description of the bloom formation, vertical migration and lateral transport of colonies within river environments by taking into account the major factors that affect the cyanobacterial bloom formation in rivers including, light, nutrients and temperature. A technique called generalised sensitivity analysis was applied to the model to identify the critical parameter uncertainties in the model and investigates the interaction between the chosen parameters of the model. The result of the analysis suggested that 8 out of 12 parameters were significant in obtaining the observed cyanobacterial behaviour in a simulation. It was found that there was a high degree of correlation between the half-saturation rate constants used in the model.

[1]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[2]  A. E. Irish,et al.  A new simulation of cyanobacterial underwater movement (SCUM'96) , 1996 .

[3]  Paul Whitehead,et al.  Quality simulation along river systems (QUASAR): model theory and development , 1997 .

[4]  W. Preiser,et al.  Fatal microcystin intoxication in haemodialysis unit in Caruaru, Brazil , 1998, The Lancet.

[5]  A. J. D. Ferguson,et al.  The role of modelling in the control of toxic blue-green algae , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  J. Passarge,et al.  Modelling vertical migration of the cyanobacterium Microcystis , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  E. Phlips,et al.  Light availability and variations in phytoplankton standing crops in a nutrient‐rich blackwater river , 2000 .

[8]  A. Edney Toxic [blue-green] algae. , 1990 .

[9]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Modelling algal behaviour in the river thames , 1984 .

[10]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[11]  J. D. Giles,et al.  Dynamical model of buoyant cyanobacteria , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  On modeling the mechanisms that control in‐stream phosphorus, macrophyte, and epiphyte dynamics: An assessment of a new model using general sensitivity analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Jean-Marc Thebault,et al.  A model of phytoplankton development in the Lot River (France).: Simulations of scenarios , 1999 .

[14]  R. Spear Eutrophication in peel inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis , 1980 .

[15]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Temporal scales of variability in pelagic environments and the response of phytoplankton , 1990 .

[16]  Jacco C. Kromkamp,et al.  A computer model of buoyancy and vertical migration in cyanobacteria , 1990 .

[17]  V. T. Chow Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[18]  G. Hornberger Eutrophication in peel inlet—I. The problem-defining behavior and a mathematical model for the phosphorus scenario , 1980 .