Identification of the lateral position of a virtual object based on echoes by humans

Echolocation offers a promising approach to improve the quality of life of people with blindness although little is known about the factors influencing object localisation using a 'searching' strategy. In this paper, we describe a series of experiments using sighted and blind human listeners and a 'virtual auditory space' technique to investigate the effects of the distance and orientation of a reflective object and the effect of stimulus bandwidth on ability to identify the right-versus-left position of the object, with bands of noise and durations from 10-400 ms. We found that performance reduced with increasing object distance. This was more rapid for object orientations where mirror-like reflection paths do not exist to both ears (i.e., most possible orientations); performance with these orientations was indistinguishable from chance at 1.8 m for even the best performing listeners in other conditions. Above-chance performance extended to larger distances when the echo was artificially presented in isolation, as might be achieved in practice by an assistive device. We also found that performance was primarily based on information above 2 kHz. Further research should extend these investigations to include other factors that are relevant to real-life echolocation.

[1]  Daniel H. Ashmead,et al.  Obstacle perception by ongenitally blind children , 1989 .

[2]  Santani Teng,et al.  The acuity of echolocation: Spatial resolution in the sighted compared to expert performance. , 2011, Journal of visual impairment & blindness.

[3]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Sensitivity to interaural intensitive disparities: listeners' use of potential cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Echolocation by Insect-Eating Bats , 2001 .

[5]  Victor Candas,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity to echo cues in blind subjects , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Daniel Rowan,et al.  Identification of auditory cues utilized in human echolocation - objective measurement results , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[7]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Discovering Your Inner Bat: Echo–Acoustic Target Ranging in Humans , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  Citation for Published Item: Use Policy Neural Correlates of Natural Human Echolocation in Early and Late Blind Echolocation Experts , 2022 .

[9]  Jerry V. Tobias,et al.  Lateralization Threshold as a Function of Stimulus Duration , 1959 .

[10]  M. Lassonde,et al.  Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  G. Jansson,et al.  The Detection and Localization of Objects by the Blind with the Aid of Long-Cane Tapping Sounds , 1986 .

[12]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. Dufour,et al.  Auditory compensation in myopic humans: involvement of binaural, monaural, or echo cues? , 2005, Brain Research.

[14]  C E Rice,et al.  Human Echo Perception , 1967, Science.

[15]  Zhangli Chen,et al.  A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds , 2011, Hearing Research.

[16]  Pablo Luis López Espí,et al.  Physical Analysis of Several Organic Signals for Human Echolocation: Oral Vacuum Pulses , 2009 .

[17]  David Whitney,et al.  Ultrafine spatial acuity of blind expert human echolocators , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Mats E Nilsson,et al.  Human Echolocation: Pitch versus Loudness Information , 2011, Perception.

[19]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Mats E Nilsson,et al.  Human Echolocation: Blind and Sighted Persons' Ability to Detect Sounds Recorded in the Presence of a Reflecting Object , 2010, Perception.

[21]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Human sound localization at near-threshold levels , 2005, Hearing Research.

[22]  Doris J. Kistler,et al.  Measurement and validation of human HRTFs for use in hearing research , 2005 .

[23]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Effect of source spectrum on sound localization in an everyday reverberant room. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .