Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.

During reading information is acquired from word(s) beyond the word that is currently looked at. It is still an open question whether such parafoveal information can influence the current viewing of a word, and if so, whether such parafoveal-on-foveal effects are attributable to distributed processing or to mislocated fixations which occur when the eyes are directed at a parafoveal word but land on another word instead. In two display-change experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the preview and target difficulty of word n+2 to investigate the role of mislocated fixations on the previous word n+1. When the eyes left word n, an easy or difficult word n+2 preview was replaced by an easy or difficult n+2 target word. In Experiment 1, n+2 processing difficulty was manipulated by means of word frequency (i.e., easy high-frequency vs. difficult low-frequency word n+2). In Experiment 2, we varied the visual familiarity of word n+2 (i.e., easy lower-case vs. difficult alternating-case writing). Fixations on the short word n+1, which were likely to be mislocated, were nevertheless not influenced by the difficulty of the adjacent word n+2, the hypothesized target of the mislocated fixation. Instead word n+1 was influenced by the preview difficulty of word n+2, representing a delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effect. The results challenge the mislocated-fixation hypothesis as an explanation of parafoveal-on-foveal effects and provide new insight into the complex spatial and temporal effect structure of processing inside the perceptual span during reading.

[1]  G. McConkie,et al.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  A. Kennedy,et al.  An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French , 2006, Vision Research.

[3]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  E. Crook,et al.  Word Recognition , 2010 .

[5]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision , 1981 .

[6]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[7]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors , 2004 .

[11]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[12]  Sarah Risse,et al.  Eye-movement control in reading : experimental and corpus-analysis challenges for a computational model , 2008 .

[13]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  G. Legge,et al.  Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements , 2008 .

[19]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[20]  Keith Rayner,et al.  On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .

[21]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[22]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Alexander Geyken,et al.  dlexDB : eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung , 2011 .

[24]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[25]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Joël Pynte,et al.  The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading , 2007, Vision Research.

[27]  K. Rayner,et al.  Is visual information integrated across saccades? , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Readers Use Bayesian Estimation for Eye Movement Control , 2010, Psychological science.

[31]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Current advances in SWIFT , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[32]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Lexical integration across saccades in reading , 1990, Psychological research.

[34]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? , 2004 .

[35]  M Dumitrache [Visual information]. , 1977, Revista de chirurgie, oncologie, radiologie, o. r. l., oftalmologie, stomatologie. Seria: Oftalmologie.

[36]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: A dead zone for the global effect , 2006, Vision Research.

[38]  C. Schiepers,et al.  Response latency and accuracy in visual word recogniton , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[40]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence , 1998 .

[43]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  H. Bouma Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[45]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[46]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[47]  G. Underwood Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[48]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and display change detection during reading. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Eye Movement Control , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[50]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[51]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions , 2004 .

[52]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text , 2010, Vision Research.

[53]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Attention to one word at a time in reading is still a viable hypothesis: rejoinder to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[57]  G. McConkie,et al.  Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading , 1976 .

[58]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[59]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[60]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[61]  E. B. Huey The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[62]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[63]  K. Kraus,et al.  The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20 century , 2006 .

[64]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  The Influence of Parafoveal Words on Foveal Inspection Time: Evidence for a Processing Trade-Off , 1998 .

[65]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  J. O'Regan Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[67]  Seth N. Greenberg,et al.  Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During Reading , 2000 .

[68]  Scott A McDonald,et al.  Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal , 2006, Vision Research.

[69]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[70]  Vincent Gautier,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(00)00089-4 , 2000 .

[71]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously , 2008, Visual cognition.

[72]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are not an artifact of mislocated saccades , 2008 .

[73]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[74]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.