Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a marine intertidal system as quantified by functional responses

Studies of trait-mediated indirect interactions (TMIIs) typically focus on effects higher predators have on per capita consumption by intermediate consumers of a third, basal prey resource. TMIIs are usually evidenced by changes in feeding rates of intermediate consumers and/or differences in densities of this third species. However, understanding and predicting effects of TMIIs on population stability of such basal species requires examination of the type and magnitude of the functional responses exhibited towards them. Here, in a marine intertidal system consisting of a higher-order fish predator, the shanny Lipophrys pholis, an intermediate predator, the amphipod Echinogammarus marinus, and a basal prey resource, the isopod Jaera nordmanni, we detected TMIIs, demonstrating the importance of habitat complexity in such interactions, by deriving functional responses and exploring consequences for prey population stability. Echinogammarus marinus reacted to fish predator diet cues by reducing activity, a typical anti-predator response, but did not alter habitat use. Basal prey, Jaera nordmanni, did not respond to fish diet cues with respect to activity, distribution or aggregation behaviour. Echinogammarus marinus exhibited type II functional responses towards J. nordmanni in simple habitat, but type III functional responses in complex habitat. However, while predator cue decreased the magnitude of the type II functional response in simple habitat, it increased the magnitude of the type III functional response in complex habitat. These findings indicate that, in simple habitats, TMIIs may drive down consumption rates within type II responses, however, this interaction may remain de-stabilising for prey populations. Conversely, in complex habitats, TMIIs may strengthen regulatory influences of intermediate consumers on prey populations, whilst potentially maintaining prey population stability. We thus highlight that TMIIs can have unexpected and complex ramifications throughout communities, but can be unravelled by considering effects on intermediate predator functional response types and magnitudes. Synthesis Higher-order predators and habitat complexity can influence behaviour of intermediate species, affecting their consumption of prey through trait-mediated indirect interactions (TMIIs). However, it is not clear how these factors interact to determine prey population stability. Using functional responses (FRs), relating predator consumption to prey density, we detected TMIIs in a marine system. In simple habitats, TMIIs reduced consumption rates, but FRs remained de-stabilising for prey populations. In complex habitats, TMIIs strengthened prey regulation with population stabilizing FRs. We thus demonstrate that FRs can assess interactions of environmental and biological cues that result in complex and unexpected outcomes for prey populations.

[1]  V. Gotceitas Variation in plant stem density and its effects on foraging success of juvenile bluegill sunfish , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[2]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[3]  R. Stein,et al.  Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation , 1989, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  Joseph Travis,et al.  How can the functional reponse best be determined? , 1988, Oecologia.

[5]  M. Mangel,et al.  PREY STATE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AFFECT RELATIVE SIZE OF TRAIT- AND DENSITY-MEDIATED INDIRECT EFFECTS , 2003 .

[6]  S. Dodson,et al.  Interactive effects of fish kairomone and light on Daphnia escape behavior , 1999 .

[7]  Chapman Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results: examples from intertidal habitats. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[8]  R. Furness,et al.  Does Holling's disc equation explain the functional response of a kleptoparasite? , 2001 .

[9]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[10]  R. Paine Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .

[11]  P. Abrams Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[12]  D. Chivers,et al.  Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information , 2001 .

[13]  B. D. Wisenden,et al.  Survival Benefit to Antipredator Behavior in the Amphipod Gammarus minus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Response to Injury-released Chemical Cues from Conspecifics and Heterospecifics , 1999 .

[14]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[15]  D. Eggleston,et al.  DENSITY‐DEPENDENT PREDATION, HABITAT VARIATION, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF MARINE BIVALVE PREY , 2001 .

[16]  Grant E. Brown,et al.  Sensory complement model helps to predict diel alarm response patterns in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) under natural conditions , 2010 .

[17]  Brett M. Johnson,et al.  Functional response of kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to Daphnia at different light levels , 2002 .

[18]  Benjamin M. Bolker,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .

[19]  P. Abrams Why Predation Rate Should Not be Proportional to Predator Density , 1993 .

[20]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Community Interactions on Marine Rocky Intertidal Shores , 1972 .

[21]  Marc J. Weissburg,et al.  Life and Death in Moving Fluids: Hydrodynamic Effects on Chemosensory‐Mediated Predation , 1993 .

[22]  D. Chivers,et al.  Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus , 1998 .

[23]  S. Large,et al.  Environmental conditions influence the frequency of prey responses to predation risk , 2011 .

[24]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Predatory nature of the littoral amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: gut content analysis and effects of alternative food and substrate heterogeneity , 2005 .

[25]  D. Chivers,et al.  Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  D. Eggleston Behavioural mechanisms underlying variable functional responses of blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus feeding on juvenile oysters, Crassostrea virginica , 1990 .

[27]  A. Sih,et al.  Experimental studies on direct and indirect interactions in a three trophic-level stream system , 1991, Oecologia.

[28]  K. Rothhaupt,et al.  Alteration of Kairomone-Induced Antipredator Response of the Freshwater Amphipod Gammarus roeseli by Sediment Type , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[29]  A. Stoner,et al.  Functional response and switching behavior of young-of-the-year piscivorous bluefish , 2000 .

[30]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[31]  S. Peacor,et al.  The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Hassell The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[33]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Sigmoid Functional Responses by Invertebrate Predators and Parasitoids , 1977 .

[34]  M. Weissburg,et al.  Clamming up: environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey. , 2006, Ecology.

[35]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[36]  M. Bertness,et al.  Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web , 2002 .

[37]  K. Nislow,et al.  Predators reverse the direction of density dependence for juvenile salmon mortality , 2008, Oecologia.

[38]  D. Chivers,et al.  Do juvenile yellow perch use diet cues to assess the level of threat posed by intraspecific predators , 2001 .

[39]  A. Stoner Perception and Choice of Substratum by Epifaunal Amphipods Associated with Seagrasses , 1980 .

[40]  D. Rogers,et al.  Random search and insect population models , 1972 .

[41]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species , 2004, Oecologia.

[42]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  STRONG IMPACTS OF GRAZING AMPHIPODS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF A BENTHIC COMMUNITY , 2000 .

[43]  M. Abrahams,et al.  The role of turbidity as a constraint on predator-prey interactions in aquatic environments , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  S. Peacor,et al.  Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivity. , 2006, Ecology.

[45]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Functional responses of the intertidal amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: effects of prey supply, model selection and habitat complexity , 2012 .

[46]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[47]  P. Dayton Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[48]  N. Monteiro,et al.  Diet preference reflects the ontogenetic shift in microhabitat use in Lipophrys pholis , 2005 .

[49]  J. Jeschke,et al.  Predicting and testing functional responses: An example from a tardigrade–nematode system , 2008 .

[50]  B. Menge,et al.  The Role of Indirect Effects in Food Webs , 1996 .

[51]  Andrew M. Turner,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE: EXPERIMENTS WITH FISH AND SNAILS , 2003 .

[52]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .

[53]  S. Baden,et al.  Trophic role of the omnivorous grass shrimp Palaemon elegans in a Swedish eelgrass system , 2008 .

[54]  M. Bertness,et al.  Trophic cascades in rocky shore tide pools: distinguishing lethal and nonlethal effects , 2004, Oecologia.

[55]  David L. Taylor,et al.  Effect of temperature on the functional response and foraging behavior of the sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa preying on juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus , 2003 .

[56]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[57]  W. Adey,et al.  The effect of micrograzers on algal community structure in a coral reef microcosm , 1981 .

[58]  D. J. Slinn,et al.  Observations on the British species of Jaera (Isopoda:Asellota) , 1961, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[59]  H. Wennhage Vulnerability of newly settled plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) to predation: effects of habitat structure and predator functional response , 2002 .

[60]  A. Covich,et al.  Non-Visual Communication in Freshwater Benthos: An Overview , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[61]  A. Laurila,et al.  Temporal variation in predation risk: stage‐dependency, graded responses and fitness costs in tadpole antipredator defences , 2004 .

[62]  C. Richardson,et al.  Chemically induced predator avoidance behaviour in the burrowing bivalve Macoma balthica , 2006 .

[63]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The Effect of a Change in Foraging Options on Intake Rate and Predation Rate , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[64]  P. Abrams Implications of Dynamically Variable Traits for Identifying, Classifying, and Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[65]  A. Sih,et al.  Prey Behavior, Prey Dispersal, and Predator Impacts on Stream Prey , 1994 .

[66]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[67]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Predator–prey dynamics between recently established stone crabs (Menippe spp.) and oyster prey (Crassostrea virginica) , 2011 .

[68]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic cascades : the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions , 2004 .

[69]  D. Wilson,et al.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  Kevin A. Hovel,et al.  Effects of native predators and eelgrass habitat structure on the introduced Asian mussel Musculista senhousia (Benson in Cantor) in southern California , 2006 .

[71]  R. Lipcius,et al.  Variable Functional Responses of a Marine Predator in Dissimilar Homogeneous Microhabitats , 1986 .

[72]  L. Crowder,et al.  Habitat structure and predator—prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems , 1991 .

[73]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Density-dependent predation by blue crabs upon infaunal clam species with contrasting distribution and abundance patterns , 1992 .

[74]  I. Agnarsson,et al.  Anonyx sarsi: a major unrecognized scavenger and predator in the intertidal zone , 1999, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[75]  B. Hazlett RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE CHEMICAL CUES BY THE CRAYFISH ORCONECTES VIRILIS , 1999 .

[76]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[77]  C. G. Leaniz,et al.  Something smells fishy: predator-naïve salmon use diet cues, not kairomones, to recognize a sympatric mammalian predator , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[78]  B. D. Wisenden,et al.  Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[79]  D. Fields,et al.  The escape behavior of marine copepods in response to a quantifiable fluid mechanical disturbance , 1997 .

[80]  A. Pérez‐Matus,et al.  Density- and trait-mediated effects of fish predators on amphipod grazers: potential indirect benefits for the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera , 2010 .

[81]  J. Marques,et al.  The influence of temperature and salinity on the duration of embryonic development, fecundity and growth of the amphipod Echinogammarus marinus Leach (Gammaridae) , 2003 .

[82]  P. Ewanchuk,et al.  Resource identity modifies the influence of predation risk on ecosystem function. , 2008, Ecology.