Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a marine intertidal system as quantified by functional responses
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nessa E. O'Connor | J. Dick | M. E. Alexander | Jaimie T. A. Dick | Mhairi E. Alexander | Nessa E. O’Connor | M. Alexander
[1] V. Gotceitas. Variation in plant stem density and its effects on foraging success of juvenile bluegill sunfish , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[2] S. L. Lima,et al. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .
[3] R. Stein,et al. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation , 1989, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[4] Joseph Travis,et al. How can the functional reponse best be determined? , 1988, Oecologia.
[5] M. Mangel,et al. PREY STATE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AFFECT RELATIVE SIZE OF TRAIT- AND DENSITY-MEDIATED INDIRECT EFFECTS , 2003 .
[6] S. Dodson,et al. Interactive effects of fish kairomone and light on Daphnia escape behavior , 1999 .
[7] Chapman. Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results: examples from intertidal habitats. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.
[8] R. Furness,et al. Does Holling's disc equation explain the functional response of a kleptoparasite? , 2001 .
[9] C. S. Holling. Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.
[10] R. Paine. Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .
[11] P. Abrams. Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.
[12] D. Chivers,et al. Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information , 2001 .
[13] B. D. Wisenden,et al. Survival Benefit to Antipredator Behavior in the Amphipod Gammarus minus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Response to Injury-released Chemical Cues from Conspecifics and Heterospecifics , 1999 .
[14] F. James Rohlf,et al. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .
[15] D. Eggleston,et al. DENSITY‐DEPENDENT PREDATION, HABITAT VARIATION, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF MARINE BIVALVE PREY , 2001 .
[16] Grant E. Brown,et al. Sensory complement model helps to predict diel alarm response patterns in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) under natural conditions , 2010 .
[17] Brett M. Johnson,et al. Functional response of kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to Daphnia at different light levels , 2002 .
[18] Benjamin M. Bolker,et al. Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .
[19] P. Abrams. Why Predation Rate Should Not be Proportional to Predator Density , 1993 .
[20] Joseph H. Connell,et al. Community Interactions on Marine Rocky Intertidal Shores , 1972 .
[21] Marc J. Weissburg,et al. Life and Death in Moving Fluids: Hydrodynamic Effects on Chemosensory‐Mediated Predation , 1993 .
[22] D. Chivers,et al. Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus , 1998 .
[23] S. Large,et al. Environmental conditions influence the frequency of prey responses to predation risk , 2011 .
[24] Mark P. Johnson,et al. Predatory nature of the littoral amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: gut content analysis and effects of alternative food and substrate heterogeneity , 2005 .
[25] D. Chivers,et al. Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet , 1996, Animal Behaviour.
[26] D. Eggleston. Behavioural mechanisms underlying variable functional responses of blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus feeding on juvenile oysters, Crassostrea virginica , 1990 .
[27] A. Sih,et al. Experimental studies on direct and indirect interactions in a three trophic-level stream system , 1991, Oecologia.
[28] K. Rothhaupt,et al. Alteration of Kairomone-Induced Antipredator Response of the Freshwater Amphipod Gammarus roeseli by Sediment Type , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[29] A. Stoner,et al. Functional response and switching behavior of young-of-the-year piscivorous bluefish , 2000 .
[30] S. Peacor,et al. A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .
[31] S. Peacor,et al. The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] M. Hassell. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.
[33] John H. Lawton,et al. Sigmoid Functional Responses by Invertebrate Predators and Parasitoids , 1977 .
[34] M. Weissburg,et al. Clamming up: environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey. , 2006, Ecology.
[35] Anne Lohrli. Chapman and Hall , 1985 .
[36] M. Bertness,et al. Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web , 2002 .
[37] K. Nislow,et al. Predators reverse the direction of density dependence for juvenile salmon mortality , 2008, Oecologia.
[38] D. Chivers,et al. Do juvenile yellow perch use diet cues to assess the level of threat posed by intraspecific predators , 2001 .
[39] A. Stoner. Perception and Choice of Substratum by Epifaunal Amphipods Associated with Seagrasses , 1980 .
[40] D. Rogers,et al. Random search and insect population models , 1972 .
[41] L. Barmuta,et al. Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species , 2004, Oecologia.
[42] J. Emmett Duffy,et al. STRONG IMPACTS OF GRAZING AMPHIPODS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF A BENTHIC COMMUNITY , 2000 .
[43] M. Abrahams,et al. The role of turbidity as a constraint on predator-prey interactions in aquatic environments , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[44] S. Peacor,et al. Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivity. , 2006, Ecology.
[45] Neal R Haddaway,et al. Functional responses of the intertidal amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: effects of prey supply, model selection and habitat complexity , 2012 .
[46] Neal R Haddaway,et al. Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses , 2012, Biological Invasions.
[47] P. Dayton. Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .
[48] N. Monteiro,et al. Diet preference reflects the ontogenetic shift in microhabitat use in Lipophrys pholis , 2005 .
[49] J. Jeschke,et al. Predicting and testing functional responses: An example from a tardigrade–nematode system , 2008 .
[50] B. Menge,et al. The Role of Indirect Effects in Food Webs , 1996 .
[51] Andrew M. Turner,et al. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE: EXPERIMENTS WITH FISH AND SNAILS , 2003 .
[52] W. Murdoch,et al. Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .
[53] S. Baden,et al. Trophic role of the omnivorous grass shrimp Palaemon elegans in a Swedish eelgrass system , 2008 .
[54] M. Bertness,et al. Trophic cascades in rocky shore tide pools: distinguishing lethal and nonlethal effects , 2004, Oecologia.
[55] David L. Taylor,et al. Effect of temperature on the functional response and foraging behavior of the sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa preying on juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus , 2003 .
[56] E. Werner,et al. Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.
[57] W. Adey,et al. The effect of micrograzers on algal community structure in a coral reef microcosm , 1981 .
[58] D. J. Slinn,et al. Observations on the British species of Jaera (Isopoda:Asellota) , 1961, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
[59] H. Wennhage. Vulnerability of newly settled plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) to predation: effects of habitat structure and predator functional response , 2002 .
[60] A. Covich,et al. Non-Visual Communication in Freshwater Benthos: An Overview , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.
[61] A. Laurila,et al. Temporal variation in predation risk: stage‐dependency, graded responses and fitness costs in tadpole antipredator defences , 2004 .
[62] C. Richardson,et al. Chemically induced predator avoidance behaviour in the burrowing bivalve Macoma balthica , 2006 .
[63] Alasdair I. Houston,et al. The Effect of a Change in Foraging Options on Intake Rate and Predation Rate , 1994, The American Naturalist.
[64] P. Abrams. Implications of Dynamically Variable Traits for Identifying, Classifying, and Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1995, The American Naturalist.
[65] A. Sih,et al. Prey Behavior, Prey Dispersal, and Predator Impacts on Stream Prey , 1994 .
[66] Jessica Gurevitch,et al. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .
[67] D. Eggleston,et al. Predator–prey dynamics between recently established stone crabs (Menippe spp.) and oyster prey (Crassostrea virginica) , 2011 .
[68] Oswald J. Schmitz,et al. Trophic cascades : the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions , 2004 .
[69] D. Wilson,et al. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[70] Kevin A. Hovel,et al. Effects of native predators and eelgrass habitat structure on the introduced Asian mussel Musculista senhousia (Benson in Cantor) in southern California , 2006 .
[71] R. Lipcius,et al. Variable Functional Responses of a Marine Predator in Dissimilar Homogeneous Microhabitats , 1986 .
[72] L. Crowder,et al. Habitat structure and predator—prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems , 1991 .
[73] D. Eggleston,et al. Density-dependent predation by blue crabs upon infaunal clam species with contrasting distribution and abundance patterns , 1992 .
[74] I. Agnarsson,et al. Anonyx sarsi: a major unrecognized scavenger and predator in the intertidal zone , 1999, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
[75] B. Hazlett. RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE CHEMICAL CUES BY THE CRAYFISH ORCONECTES VIRILIS , 1999 .
[76] Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al. PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .
[77] C. G. Leaniz,et al. Something smells fishy: predator-naïve salmon use diet cues, not kairomones, to recognize a sympatric mammalian predator , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[78] B. D. Wisenden,et al. Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[79] D. Fields,et al. The escape behavior of marine copepods in response to a quantifiable fluid mechanical disturbance , 1997 .
[80] A. Pérez‐Matus,et al. Density- and trait-mediated effects of fish predators on amphipod grazers: potential indirect benefits for the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera , 2010 .
[81] J. Marques,et al. The influence of temperature and salinity on the duration of embryonic development, fecundity and growth of the amphipod Echinogammarus marinus Leach (Gammaridae) , 2003 .
[82] P. Ewanchuk,et al. Resource identity modifies the influence of predation risk on ecosystem function. , 2008, Ecology.