Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

The selection of an ideal screw size plays a crucial role in the success of spinal instrumentation as larger diameter screws are thought to provide better fixation strength but increase the risk of pedicle failure during insertion. On the other hand, smaller diameter screws are with lesser risk of pedicle breakage but are thought to compromise the stability of the instrumentation. By investigating the relationship between screw diameter and the pullout strength of pedicle screws after fatigue loading, this study seeks to find quantitative biomechanical data for surgeons in determining the most ideal diameter size screws when performing surgical implementations on osteoporotic vertebrae. Twenty-seven osteoporotic (BMD ranged: 0.353-0.848 g/cm2) thoracic vertebrae (T3-T8) were harvested from 5 human cadavers. Two sizes of poly-axial screws (5.0 mm × 35 and 4.35 mm × 35) were implanted into each pedicles of the vertebrae by an experienced surgeon. Specimens were randomly distributed into control group, fatigue group of 5000 and 10,000 cycles with peak-to-peak loadings of 10-100 N at 1 Hz. Each specimen was then axial pullout tested at a constant rate of 5 mm/min. The ultimate pullout strength (N) & stiffness (N/mm) were obtained for analysis. The results showed that although the larger diameter screws achieved superior pullout strength immediately after the implantation, both sizes of screws exhibited comparable pullout strengths post fatigue loading. This indicates that the smaller diameter screws may be considered for surgical techniques performed on osteoporotic vertebrae for reduced risk of pedicle breakage without sacrificing fixation strength.

[1]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[2]  William E. Lee,et al.  Balancing Rigidity and Safety of Pedicle Screw Fixation via a Novel Expansion Mechanism in a Severely Osteoporotic Model , 2015, BioMed research international.

[3]  M. Helgeson,et al.  Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  F. Luo,et al.  Surgical treatment of the osteoporotic spine with bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation: technical description and preliminary application in 43 patients , 2015, Clinics.

[5]  N. Theodore,et al.  Quantitative analysis of misplaced pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: how much pullout strength is lost?: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[7]  G. Huber,et al.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[8]  W. Hutton,et al.  A biomechanical study of two different pedicle screw methods for fixation in osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic vertebrae. , 2012, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.

[9]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[10]  Jaw-Lin Wang,et al.  Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screws improved with cortical bone ratio: a cadaveric study , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[11]  K. Chin,et al.  The risks of pedicle wall breech with larger screws after undertapping. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  Y. Akpolat,et al.  Fatigue Performance of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Compared With Standard Trajectory Pedicle Screw , 2016, Spine.

[13]  O. Johnell,et al.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  N. Crawford,et al.  Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  B. Bucklen,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Pedicle Screw Anchor Designed for the Osteoporotic Population. , 2015, World neurosurgery.

[16]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during walking. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  D. Hukins,et al.  The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  R. McLain,et al.  Primary Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae: Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Fixation Strength , 2007, Spine.

[20]  S. Nassar,et al.  Pullout performance of self-tapping medical screws. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  C. Hellmich,et al.  Extracellular bone matrix exhibits hardening elastoplasticity and more than double cortical strength: Evidence from homogeneous compression of non-tapered single micron-sized pillars welded to a rigid substrate. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[22]  Ankit H Shah,et al.  Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  Peter Augat,et al.  Influence of thread design on pedicle screw fixation. Laboratory investigation. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[24]  Paul Tornetta,et al.  A Comparison of Screw Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[25]  T. Washio,et al.  Structural Characteristics of the Pedicle and Its Role in Screw Stability , 1997, Spine.

[26]  N. Crawford,et al.  Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[27]  William E Lee,et al.  Designs and Techniques That Improve the Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: Current Status , 2014, BioMed research international.

[28]  Young-Yul Kim,et al.  Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  J. Goldhahn,et al.  Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae , 2006, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[30]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Safety and Strength of a Novel Medial, Partial Nonthreaded Pedicle Screw: A Cadaveric and Biomechanical Investigation , 2013, Clinical spine surgery.

[32]  W. Hutton,et al.  Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae. , 2009, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.