Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution.

Ninety-three human cadaver tests are used in the development of thoracic injury risk functions with consideration of age and restraint condition. Linear logistic regression models are developed with the set of potential predictors including the maximum chest deflection, the age of the cadaver at death, gender, and the loading condition on the anterior thorax: blunt hub (41 tests), seat belt (26 tests), air bag (12 tests), and combined belt-and-bag (14 tests). Predicted outcomes were the probability of any rib fractures (onset of injury) and the probability of greater than six rib fractures (severe injury). The analysis shows that the injury risk function was not dependent on the loading condition, but was strongly dependent on age. A significant injury risk model with good ability to discriminate injury from non-injury tests (P < 0.0001, chi-square = 21.49, area under receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) = 0.867, Kruskal's Gamma = 0.732) is presented using only maximum chest deflection and cadaver age as predictors of injury risk. The 50% risk of any rib fractures is found to occur at 35% chest deflection for a 30-year-old, but at 13% deflection for a 70-year-old. The 50% risk of severe injury is shown to occur at 33% chest deflection for a 70-year-old, but at 43% for a 30-year-old.

[1]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[2]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[3]  I S Bush,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE PREDICTION OF CONTUSION INJURY UNDER NON-PENETRATING THORACIC IMPACT. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1989 INTERNATIONAL IRCOBI CONFERENCE ON THE BIOMECHANICS OF IMPACTS, HELD IN STOCKHOLM, 13-15 SEPTEMBER 1989 , 1989 .

[4]  John W. Melvin,et al.  AGE EFFECTS ON THORACIC INJURY TOLERANCE , 1996 .

[5]  R W Kent,et al.  The influence of superficial soft tissues and restraint condition on thoracic skeletal injury prediction. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[6]  Gianiuca Cesari,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF HUMAN SURROGATES THORAX UNDER BELT LOADING. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1990 .

[7]  David C. Viano,et al.  Thoracic injury potential , 1978 .

[8]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Thoracic Trauma Assessment Formulations for Restrained Drivers in Simulated Frontal Impacts , 1994 .

[9]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Age-related Changes in the Effective Stiffness of the Human Thorax Using Four Loading Conditions , 2003 .

[10]  J. Crandall,et al.  Thoracic Response and Trauma in Air Bag Deployment Tests with Out-of-Position Small Female Surrogates , 1999 .

[11]  Dennis C. Schneider,et al.  Cadaver Skeletal Response to Blunt Thoracic Impact , 1975 .

[12]  J R Crandall,et al.  BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF THE THOR ADVANCED FRONTAL CRASH TEST DUMMY , 2000 .

[13]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Thoracic injury criterion for frontal crash applicable to all restraint systems. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  Yuichi Kitagawa,et al.  Muscle Tetanus and Loading Condition Effects on the Elastic and Viscous Characteristics of the Thorax , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[15]  J. Hanley.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[16]  Robert Bouquet,et al.  COMPARISON OF HYBRID III AND HUMAN CADAVER THORAX DEFORMATIONS LOADED BY A THORACIC BELT , 1994 .

[17]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion , 1998 .

[18]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[19]  I. Stein,et al.  Rib structure and bending strength: An autopsy study , 1976, Calcified Tissue Research.

[20]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[21]  Brian N. Fildes,et al.  Benefits of a 64km/h offset crash test in Australia , 2001 .

[22]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[23]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  On the synergism of the driver air bag and the 3-point belt in frontal collisions , 1995 .

[24]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[25]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  RESTRAINED HYBRID III DUMMY-BASED CRITERIA FOR THORACIC HARD-TISSUE INJURY PREDICTION , 2001 .