Artificial Neural Network Model as a Data Analysis Tool in Precision Farming

Spatial variation in landscape and soil properties combined with temporal variations in weather can result in yield patterns that change annually within a field. The complexity of interactions between a number of yield-limiting factors makes it difficult to accurately attribute yield losses to conditions that occur within a field. In this research, a back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model was developed to predict the spatial distribution of soybean yields and to understand the causes of yield variability. First, we developed a BPNN model by relating soybean yield to topography, soil, weather, and site factors and evaluated model predictions for the same field for independent years. We also explored the potential use of BPNN for predicting yields in independent fields. Finally, we evaluated the ability of the BPNN to attribute yield losses due to soybean cyst nematodes (SCN), soil pH, and weeds. A total of 14 input datasets with combinations of four controlling factors (topographic, soil fertility, weather, and site) were used. For each objective, data from fields in Iowa were used for training the BPNN, while a portion of the data was withheld to verify the accuracy of yield predictions. All BPNN models had fully connected feed-forward architecture with a back-propagation weight adjustment algorithm. When tested for a particular field, the BPNN captured the major patterns of yield variability in independent years; the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was 14.2% of actual yield. When the BPNN was trained with inputs from five fields, the RMSEP at test sites was 11.2% of actual yield. When the BPNN was used to attribute yield losses to soil pH, SCN, and weed populations, standard errors were 92, 262, and 171 kg ha-1, respectively. The technique showed that the BPNN could predict spatial yield variability with an RMSEP of about 14%.

[1]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Fuzzy Neural Network Classification of Global Land Cover from a 1° AVHRR Data Set , 1999 .

[2]  G. Carpenter,et al.  ARTMAP Neural Network Classification of Land Use Change , 2001 .

[3]  Judith E. Dayhoff,et al.  Neural Network Architectures: An Introduction , 1989 .

[4]  I. Moore,et al.  Terrain‐based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data , 1991 .

[5]  Halbert White,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks: Approximation and Learning Theory , 1992 .

[6]  G. Smith,et al.  Distribution, Density, and Diversity of Heterodera glycines in Missouri. , 1993, Journal of nematology.

[7]  I. D. Moore,et al.  Topographic Effects on the Distribution of Surface Soil Water and the Location of Ephemeral Gullies , 1988 .

[8]  Chun-Chieh Yang,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Model for Subsurface-Drained Farmlands , 1997 .

[9]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Mixture Estimation for Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[10]  Ayse Irmak,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLANT AVAI LABLE SOIL WATER AND YIELD FOR EXPLAINING SOYBEAN YIELD VARIABILITY , 2002 .

[11]  Gregory L. Tylka,et al.  METHOD TO USE CROP GROWTH MODELS TO ESTIMATE POTENTIAL RETURN FOR VARIABLE–RATE MANAGEMENT IN SOYBEANS , 2001 .

[12]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  Estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration using fuzzy state models , 2001 .

[13]  Gregory L. Tylka,et al.  A MODELING APPROACH TO QUANTIFY THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL SOYBEAN YIELD LIMITING FACTORS , 2001 .

[14]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[15]  Scott A. Shearer,et al.  BACKPROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORK DESIGN AND EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFYING WEED SPECIES USING COLOR IMAGE TEXTURE , 2000 .

[16]  J. Hanway,et al.  How a soybean plant develops , 1967 .

[17]  Ayse Irmak,et al.  ESTIMATING SPATIALLY VARIABLE SOIL PROPERTIES FOR APPLICATION OF CROP MODELS IN PRECISION FARMING , 2001 .

[18]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  ANALYSIS OFWATER STRESS EFFECTS CAUSING SPATIAL YIELD VARIABILITY IN SOYBEANS , 1998 .

[19]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[20]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  Optimization of Fuzzy Evapotranspiration Model Through Neural Training with Input-Output Examples , 2001 .

[21]  Jing Liu,et al.  Neural networks for setting target corn yields , 2000 .

[22]  Ayse Irmak,et al.  LINKING MULTIPLE LAYERS OF INFORMATION FOR DIAGNOSING CAUSES OF SPATIAL YIELD VARIABILITY IN SOYBEAN , 2002 .

[23]  Ayse Irmak,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE CROPGRO-SOYBEAN MODEL FOR ASSESSING CLIMATE IMPACTS ON REGIONAL SOYBEAN YIELDS , 2005 .

[24]  J. Paz Analysis of spatial yield variability and economics of prescriptions for precision agriculture: a crop modeling approach , 2000 .

[25]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  ART neural networks for remote sensing: vegetation classification from Landsat TM and terrain data , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[26]  Chun-Chieh Yang,et al.  Applications of Artificial Neural Networks to Land Drainage Engineering , 1996 .

[27]  P. E. Keller,et al.  Three neural network based, sensor systems for environmental monitoring , 1994, Proceedings of ELECTRO '94.

[28]  Janet Franklin,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Efficient Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[29]  J. F. Reid,et al.  GUIDANCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFIER , 1999 .