Temporal transitions in participation flow in an asynchronous discussion forum

This study examined the overarching issue of how temporal transitions, specifically duration of message flow, affects momentum or wellness of discussion in an asynchronous forum. Quantitative data representing time indicators in discussion activity included posting patterns related to duration (density, intensity, latency, and response count), Day-In topic, day of week, and time of day. Qualitative analysis identified notable spikes or irregularities (i.e., peaks and valleys) in the content level of postings. Results revealed that for open-ended topics (i.e., no specific end date imposed by the instructor), the momentum of forum discussion may be short-term, between 21 and 28days into the topic. Peaks and valleys subsequent to 31days were not significant to discussion vitality. Students posted mainly early to mid-week. Time of day had no direct influence on the vitality of the discussion. Strategies for applying temporal transitions in an online forum to motivate and sustain student participation are discussed.

[1]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[2]  Namin Shin,et al.  Online learner's 'flow' experience: an empirical study , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  William J. Gibbs,et al.  An Analysis of Temporal Norms in Online Discussions , 2008 .

[5]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[6]  Jennifer Hayes,et al.  Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Allan Jeong.  The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online , 2003 .

[8]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  It's the Same Only Different: The Effect the Discussion Moderator Has on Student Participation in Online Class Discussions. , 2004 .

[9]  Allan Jeong.  A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns in Computer‐mediated Communication , 2005 .

[10]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1988 .

[11]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Perspectives on Time , 2007 .

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2004 .

[13]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Laurie J. Bonnici,et al.  Frequency, intensity and topicality in online learning: An exploration of the interaction dimensions that contribute to student satisfaction in online learning , 2007 .

[15]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[16]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Allan Jeong,et al.  How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  Karen Swan,et al.  The Development of Virtual Learning Communities , 2005 .

[19]  Yoram M. Kalman,et al.  Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2005 Email Chronemics: Unobtrusive Profiling of Response Times , 2022 .