The thermal analysis of a combined heat and power plant undergoing Clausius-Rankine cycle based on the theory of effective heat-absorbing and heat-emitting temperatures

Abstract In a combined heat and power plant (CHP plant), heat and power are produced simultaneously in the same power plant process. The CHP technology reduces total fuel consumption compared to a situation where heat and electricity are produced separately. For condensing power plants the exergy loss is usually calculated by multiplying the entropy generation rate with the real environmental temperature because the plant exchanges heat with the environment at the temperature close to this temperature. Instead, CHP plants emit heat into the environment at higher temperature level. The goal of this paper is to perform the Second Law analysis for a coal-fired CHP plant undergoing Clausius–Rankine cycle. The Second Law analysis is based on the use of effective heat-absorbing and heat-emitting temperatures. In this paper, temperatures are defined for a CHP plant undergoing Clausius–Rankine cycle. The maximum power to heat ratio of the CHP plant as well as entropy generation and power (exergy) losses are defined using the before mentioned temperatures instead of the real environmental temperature.

[1]  A. Campos-Celador,et al.  Thermoeconomic analysis of a micro-CHP installation in a tertiary sector building through dynamic simulation , 2012 .

[2]  E Bilgen,et al.  Exergetic and engineering analyses of gas turbine based cogeneration systems , 2000 .

[3]  Noam Lior,et al.  Exergy analysis of an operating boiling-water-reactor nuclear power station , 1995 .

[4]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of two micro CHP systems operating with geothermal and solar energy , 2012 .

[5]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Energy- and exergy-based comparison of coal-fired and nuclear steam power plants , 2001 .

[6]  Pekka Ruohonen,et al.  Determination of the Real Loss of Power for a Condensing and a Backpressure Turbine by Means of Second Law Analysis , 2009, Entropy.

[7]  Isam H. Aljundi,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan , 2009 .

[8]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Thermodynamic analyses of a biomass integrated fired combined cycle , 2013 .

[9]  Jesper Ahrenfeldt,et al.  Biomass gasification cogeneration – A review of state of the art technology and near future perspectives , 2013 .

[10]  S. Saxena,et al.  Experimental study of biogas combustion in an HCCI engine for power generation with high indicated efficiency and ultra-low NOx emissions. , 2012 .

[11]  Jian Sun,et al.  New waste heat district heating system with combined heat and power based on absorption heat exchange cycle in China , 2012 .

[12]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant with measured boiler and turbine losses , 2010 .

[13]  Nurdil Eskin,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a FBCC steam power plant , 2009 .

[14]  Hasbi Yavuz,et al.  Exergy analysis of a pressurized-water reactor nuclear-power plant , 2001 .

[15]  Markku Lampinen,et al.  Theory of Effective Heat-Absorbing and Heat-Emitting Temperatures in Entropy and Exergy Analysis with Applications to Flow Systems and Combustion Processes , 2006 .

[16]  Felipe Raul Ponce Arrieta,et al.  Small scale biomass CHP plant: An assessment for an animal feed industry , 2013 .

[17]  M. W. Chase JANAF thermochemical tables , 1986 .

[18]  G. P. Verkhivker,et al.  On the exergy analysis of power plants , 2001 .

[19]  T. Woudstra,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of combined cycle plants , 2010 .