Morphological Constraints on Cerebellar Granule Cell Combinatorial Diversity

Combinatorial expansion by the cerebellar granule cell layer (GCL) is fundamental to theories of cerebellar contributions to motor control and learning. Granule cells (GrCs) sample approximately four mossy fiber inputs and are thought to form a combinatorial code useful for pattern separation and learning. We constructed a spatially realistic model of the cerebellar GCL and examined how GCL architecture contributes to GrC combinatorial diversity. We found that GrC combinatorial diversity saturates quickly as mossy fiber input diversity increases, and that this saturation is in part a consequence of short dendrites, which limit access to diverse inputs and favor dense sampling of local inputs. This local sampling also produced GrCs that were combinatorially redundant, even when input diversity was extremely high. In addition, we found that mossy fiber clustering, which is a common anatomical pattern, also led to increased redundancy of GrC input combinations. We related this redundancy to hypothesized roles of temporal expansion of GrC information encoding in service of learned timing, and we show that GCL architecture produces GrC populations that support both temporal and combinatorial expansion. Finally, we used novel anatomical measurements from mice of either sex to inform modeling of sparse and filopodia-bearing mossy fibers, finding that these circuit features uniquely contribute to enhancing GrC diversification and redundancy. Our results complement information theoretic studies of granule layer structure and provide insight into the contributions of granule layer anatomical features to afferent mixing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cerebellar granule cells are among the simplest neurons, with tiny somata and, on average, just four dendrites. These characteristics, along with their dense organization, inspired influential theoretical work on the granule cell layer as a combinatorial expander, where each granule cell represents a unique combination of inputs. Despite the centrality of these theories to cerebellar physiology, the degree of expansion supported by anatomically realistic patterns of inputs is unknown. Using modeling and anatomy, we show that realistic input patterns constrain combinatorial diversity by producing redundant combinations, which nevertheless could support temporal diversification of like combinations, suitable for learned timing. Our study suggests a neural substrate for producing high levels of both combinatorial and temporal diversity in the granule cell layer.

[1]  F. Sultan,et al.  Distribution of mossy fibre rosettes in the cerebellum of cat and mice: evidence for a parasagittal organization at the single fibre level , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Roy V Sillitoe,et al.  Engrailed Homeobox Genes Regulate Establishment of the Cerebellar Afferent Circuit Map , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Properties of Somatosensory Synaptic Integration in Cerebellar Granule Cells In Vivo , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  N. Donegan,et al.  A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[6]  R Angus Silver,et al.  The Contribution of Single Synapses to Sensory Representation in Vivo , 2008, Science.

[7]  Y Shinoda,et al.  Projection patterns of single mossy fibers originating from the lateral reticular nucleus in the rat cerebellar cortex and nuclei , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  R. Angus Silver,et al.  Network Structure within the Cerebellar Input Layer Enables Lossless Sparse Encoding , 2014, Neuron.

[9]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  Kanichay Rt,et al.  Synaptic and Cellular Properties of the Feedforward Inhibitory Circuit within the Input Layer of the Cerebellar Cortex , 2008 .

[11]  S. Blomfield,et al.  How the Cerebellum may be Used , 1970, Nature.

[12]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  The Sparseness of Mixed Selectivity Neurons Controls the Generalization–Discrimination Trade-Off , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[14]  Jean-Luc Dupont,et al.  Stereotyped spatial patterns of functional synaptic connectivity in the cerebellar cortex , 2015, eLife.

[15]  M. Glickstein,et al.  The anatomy of the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  D J Rosen,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  C. Mason,et al.  Postnatal maturation of cerebellar mossy and climbing fibers: transient expression of dual features on single axons , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Optimal Degrees of Synaptic Connectivity , 2017, Neuron.

[19]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[20]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  A. Person,et al.  Cerebellar premotor output neurons collateralize to innervate the cerebellar cortex , 2015, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  J G Bjaalie,et al.  Salient anatomic features of the cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[24]  Egidio D'Angelo,et al.  The Spatial Organization of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity at the Input Stage of Cerebellum , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Martin T. Wiechert,et al.  Synaptic diversity enables temporal coding of coincident multi-sensory inputs in single neurons , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Suzana Herculano-Houzel,et al.  Coordinated Scaling of Cortical and Cerebellar Numbers of Neurons , 2010, Front. Neuroanat..

[27]  J R Bloedel,et al.  Organizational features of the cat and monkey cerebellar nucleocortical projection , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[29]  S. Cull-Candy,et al.  Development of a tonic form of synaptic inhibition in rat cerebellar granule cells resulting from persistent activation of GABAA receptors. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  D. Harriman CEREBELLAR CORTEX, CYTOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION , 1974 .

[31]  J. Hámori,et al.  Quantitative morphology and synaptology of cerebellar glomeruli in the rat , 1988, Anatomy and Embryology.

[32]  L. Luo,et al.  Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward , 2017, Nature.

[33]  L. Eisenman,et al.  External cuneocerebellar projection and Purkinje cell zebrin II bands: A direct comparison of parasagittal banding in the mouse cerebellum , 1994, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[34]  L. Abbott,et al.  Random Convergence of Olfactory Inputs in the Drosophila Mushroom Body , 2013, Nature.

[35]  E. D’Angelo,et al.  Regulation of output spike patterns by phasic inhibition in cerebellar granule cells , 2014, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[36]  E. D’Angelo,et al.  Beyond parallel fiber LTD: the diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Häusser,et al.  High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons , 2007, Nature.

[38]  R Angus Silver,et al.  Synaptic and Cellular Properties of the Feedforward Inhibitory Circuit within the Input Layer of the Cerebellar Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Claudia Clopath,et al.  Sparse synaptic connectivity is required for decorrelation and pattern separation in feedforward networks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[40]  J Szentágothai,et al.  Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. II. Cell numbers and densities in the granular layer. , 1971, Brain research.

[41]  Zhanmin Lin,et al.  Excitatory Cerebellar Nucleocortical Circuit Provides Internal Amplification during Associative Conditioning , 2016, Neuron.

[42]  E. D’Angelo Challenging Marr’s theory of the cerebellum , 2016 .

[43]  Greg Wayne,et al.  A temporal basis for predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands in an electric fish , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  H. Jörntell,et al.  Questioning the role of sparse coding in the brain , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[46]  Nathaniel B Sawtell,et al.  Multimodal Integration in Granule Cells as a Basis for Associative Plasticity and Sensory Prediction in a Cerebellum-like Circuit , 2010, Neuron.

[47]  Tiago Branco,et al.  Control of cerebellar granule cell output by sensory-evoked Golgi cell inhibition , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Roy V. Sillitoe,et al.  Parasagittal compartmentation of cerebellar mossy fibers as revealed by the patterned expression of vesicular glutamate transporters VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 , 2011, Brain Structure and Function.

[49]  S. T. Kitai,et al.  Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. I. Climbing fiber system , 1977, Brain Research.

[50]  I. Sugihara,et al.  Projection patterns of single mossy fiber axons originating from the dorsal column nuclei mapped on the aldolase C compartments in the rat cerebellar cortex , 2011, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Cutaneous receptive fields and topography of mossy fibres and climbing fibres projecting to cat cerebellar C3 zone , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  Egidio D'Angelo,et al.  The cerebellar Golgi cell and spatiotemporal organization of granular layer activity , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[53]  Carol A. Mason,et al.  Development of Axon-Target Specificity of Ponto-Cerebellar Afferents , 2011, PLoS biology.

[54]  Great Expectations: Anticipatory Control of Magnocellular Vasopressin Neurons , 2017, Neuron.

[55]  Sergio Solinas,et al.  Local Field Potential Modeling Predicts Dense Activation in Cerebellar Granule Cells Clusters under LTP and LTD Control , 2011, PloS one.

[56]  E. D’Angelo,et al.  Evidence for NMDA and mGlu receptor-dependent long-term potentiation of mossy fiber-granule cell transmission in rat cerebellum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  Tiago Branco,et al.  Tonic Inhibition Enhances Fidelity of Sensory Information Transmission in the Cerebellar Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Processing of Multi-dimensional Sensorimotor Information in the Spinal and Cerebellar Neuronal Circuitry: A New Hypothesis , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[59]  K. Sanderson,et al.  Patterns of afferent projections to transitional zones in the somatic sensorimotor cerebral cortex of albino rats , 1984, Brain Research.

[60]  G. Bishop,et al.  Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. II. Mossy fiber system , 1977, Brain Research.

[61]  Thierry Nieus,et al.  A Realistic Large-Scale Model of the Cerebellum Granular Layer Predicts Circuit Spatio-Temporal Filtering Properties , 2009, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[62]  Abigail L. Person,et al.  Cerebellar Loops: A Review of the Nucleocortical Pathway , 2013, The Cerebellum.

[63]  J. Freeman,et al.  Stimulation of the lateral geniculate, superior colliculus, or visual cortex is sufficient for eyeblink conditioning in rats. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[64]  J. Freeman,et al.  Eyeblink conditioning in rats using pontine stimulation as a conditioned stimulus , 2004, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[65]  Y Shinoda,et al.  Axon collaterals of mossy fibers from the pontine nucleus in the cerebellar dentate nucleus. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  R. W. Draft,et al.  Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system , 2007, Nature.

[67]  Ben Deverett,et al.  Cerebellar granule cells acquire a widespread predictive feedback signal during motor learning , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  P. Strata,et al.  Learning-related feedforward inhibitory connectivity growth required for memory precision , 2011, Nature.

[69]  Egidio D'Angelo,et al.  The Critical Role of Golgi Cells in Regulating Spatio-Temporal Integration and Plasticity at the Cerebellum Input Stage , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[70]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Multimodal sensory integration in single cerebellar granule cells in vivo , 2015, eLife.

[71]  Ruben Portugues,et al.  Sensorimotor Representations in Cerebellar Granule Cells in Larval Zebrafish Are Dense, Spatially Organized, and Non-temporally Patterned , 2017, Current Biology.

[72]  Adam W Hantman,et al.  Convergence of pontine and proprioceptive streams onto multimodal cerebellar granule cells , 2013, eLife.