Exploring an ecotoxicity database with the OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox and DRAGON descriptors in order to prioritise testing on algae, daphnids, and fish.

The European regulation on chemicals (REACh) places emphasis on reduction of systematic toxicity testing, thus fostering development of alternative methods. Consequently, we analysed acute toxicity data gathered by the Japanese Ministry of Environment for three species belonging to three different trophic levels (i.e., Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata 72-hour EC50, Daphnia magna 48-hour EC50 and Oryzias latipes 96-hour LC50). This paper investigates the relationships between the chemical structure and both the toxicity of the chemicals and the cross-species differences in sensitivity. The physicochemical properties of the chemicals were represented by the categories they belonged to in several widely-used categorisation schemes implemented by the freely available OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox and by quantitative molecular descriptors using DRAGON software. The outputs of these software products were analysed and compared in terms of quality of prediction and biological interpretation. Amongst the categorisations implemented by the OECD Toolbox, those focussing on bioaccumulation or biotransformation appeared to be the most interesting in terms of environmental prediction on a whole set of chemicals, in particular as the predicted biotransformation half-life is strongly dependent on hydrophobicity. In predicting toxicity towards each species, simple linear regression on logP performed better than PLS regression of toxicity on a very large set of molecular descriptors. However, the predictions based on the interspecies correlations performed better than the QSAR predictions. The results in terms of cross-species comparisons encourage the use of test strategies focussing on reducing the number of tests on fish.

[1]  Graham L. Patrick,et al.  An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry , 1995 .

[2]  E. Mombelli,et al.  What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation? , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  D. D. de Roode,et al.  QSARs in ecotoxicological risk assessment. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  A. Furuhama,et al.  Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity (KATE) system, March 2009 version , 2010, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[6]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[7]  Jürg Oliver Straub,et al.  A strategy to reduce the numbers of fish used in acute ecotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Estimation of Aqueous Solubility of Chemical Compounds Using E-State Indices , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Michael H Abraham,et al.  Interspecies correlations of toxicity to eight aquatic organisms: theoretical considerations. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Jon A Arnot,et al.  A quantitative structure‐activity relationship for predicting metabolic biotransformation rates for organic chemicals in fish , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  B. Escher,et al.  QSAR-analysis and mixture toxicity as diagnostic tools: Influence of degradation on the toxicity and mode of action of diuron in algae and daphnids. , 2010, Aquatic toxicology.

[13]  S Ram,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships. , 1979, Progress in drug research. Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung. Progres des recherches pharmaceutiques.

[14]  Chung-Yuan Chen,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for toxicity of nonpolar narcotic chemicals to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  K. Urano,et al.  A new method for evaluating biological safety of environmental water with algae, daphnia and fish toxicity ranks. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[17]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. Part 4. Additional Parameters for Hydrophobic and Dispersive Interactions and Their Application for an Automated , 1989 .

[18]  Kikuo Yoshida,et al.  Acute toxicity of chlorophenols to green algae, Selenastrum capricornutum and Chlorella vulgaris, and quantitative structure-activity relationships , 1988 .

[19]  Albertinka J Murk,et al.  Alternative approaches can greatly reduce the number of fish used for acute toxicity testing , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[20]  Pablo R. Duchowicz,et al.  Quantitative Structure‐Toxicity Models for Heterogeneous Aliphatic Compounds , 2009 .

[21]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory – Design and Description , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[22]  Antonio Finizio,et al.  Quantitative inter-specific chemical activity relationships of pesticides in the aquatic environment. , 2004, Aquatic toxicology.

[23]  Dries Knapen,et al.  Aquatic multi-species acute toxicity of (chlorinated) anilines: experimental versus predicted data. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[24]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[25]  Toxicity and quantitative structure-activity relationships of nitriles based on Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[26]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  External Validation and Prediction Employing the Predictive Squared Correlation Coefficient Test Set Activity Mean vs Training Set Activity Mean , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  Toxicity of substituted anilines to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and quantitative structure‐activity relationship analysis for polar narcotics , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[28]  J. Hermens,et al.  Pattern analysis of the variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[29]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q 2 , 2002 .

[30]  Alessandro Pedretti,et al.  VEGA – An open platform to develop chemo-bio-informatics applications, using plug-in architecture and script programming , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[31]  J. Hermens,et al.  Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species in relation to the classification of environmental pollutants. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[32]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[33]  Birgit Sokull-Klüttgen,et al.  Acute toxicity data: A comprehensive comparison of results of fish, daphnia, and algae tests with new substances notified in the European Union , 2000 .

[34]  S. Hirono,et al.  Simple Method of Calculating Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. , 1992 .

[35]  Robert S. Boethling,et al.  Predicting ready biodegradability in the Japanese ministry of international trade and industry test , 2000 .

[36]  Qsar investigation of a large data set for fish, algae and Daphnia toxicity , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[37]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..