Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems

Technological advances have made possible industrial and commercial applications of artificial intelligence, virtual reality and highly integrated manufacturing systems. It has also freed business activity from a focus on place, as both work activities and markets have been able to harness information and communication technologies in order to operate remotely. As a result, researchers have highlighted a phenomenon of ‘smart’ working. Some have pointed to a fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) in which ‘smart’ factories use robotics to achieve high performance. There is now a suggestion of progress towards Industry 5.0, in which technological and social systems work in harmony to deliver personalised mass customization of products and services. This paper examines these developments from the perspective of unique, individual understandings of work roles and sustainability, posing the questions ‘Smart’ from whose point of view? Do smart systems promote sustainable organizations? How should design of smart systems be approached? It suggests that contemporary socio-technical systems approaches to organizational analysis are the best way to support harnessing of smart technologies in organizations.

[1]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Reasons and Rationalizations , 2004 .

[2]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[3]  Zofia Patora-Wysocka.  The Institutionalization of Practice : a Processual Perspective on Value co-Creation , 2016 .

[4]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Christine E. Welch,et al.  IS, Process and Organizational Change and their Relationships to Contextual Dependencies , 2005 .

[6]  P O Skobelev,et al.  On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: from digital manufacturing to digital society , 2017 .

[7]  J. Fuhse.  Culture and Social Networks , 2015 .

[8]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[9]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  The security challenges in the IoT enabled cyber-physical systems and opportunities for evolutionary computing & other computational intelligence , 2016, 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[10]  The certainty of uncertainty , 2004 .

[11]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[12]  Peter Checkland,et al.  O.R. and the Systems Movement: Mappings and Conflicts , 1983 .

[13]  Henri Fayol,et al.  Fayolism : selected papers on the writings of Fayol . and, Industrial and general administration ; and, General and industrial management , 2004 .

[14]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science , 2010 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  M. Alvesson,et al.  A Stupidity‐Based Theory of Organizations , 2012 .

[17]  B. Willard.  The Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line , 2002 .

[18]  Paolo Spagnoletti,et al.  Organisational learning as an emerging process: The generative role of digital tools in informal learning practices , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[20]  Eusebio Scornavacca,et al.  The role of media dependency in predicting continuance intention to use ubiquitous media systems , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[21]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[22]  Nkiru Nnawulezi.  Linking organizational context to survivor empowerment: A mixed methods study , 2015 .

[23]  P. Bednar,et al.  Individual Emergence in Contextual Analysis , 2001 .

[24]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[25]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Managing Understanding in Organizations , 2007 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World , 2015 .

[27]  Paolo Spagnoletti,et al.  A Business Aware Information Security Risk Analysis Method , 2011 .

[28]  Chris Kubiak,et al.  | Learning in Landscapes of Practice | Taylor & Francis Group , 2014 .

[29]  P. Drucker,et al.  The Future of Management , 2008 .

[30]  P. Bednar,et al.  A Case for Holistic, Multicriteria Benefit Analysis , 2013 .

[31]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Bias, Misinformation and the Paradox of Neutrality , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[32]  Ankit Kumar,et al.  Beyond technical smartness: Rethinking the development and implementation of sociotechnical smart grids in India , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[33]  Christine Welch,et al.  Inquiry into Informing Systems: critical systemic thinking in practice , 2009 .

[34]  Donghee Shin,et al.  Der Open-access-publikationsserver Der Zbw – Leibniz-informationszentrum Wirtschaft the Open Access Publication Server of the Zbw – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics a Socio-technical Framework for Internet-of-things Design a Socio-technical Framework for Internet-of-things Design , 2022 .

[35]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Learning for Professional Competence in an IS Context , 2016, SCIS/IFIP8.6.

[36]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[37]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[38]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  General Systems Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications , 1974 .

[39]  Sarah L. Hickmott,et al.  Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[40]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  The 2016 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study , 2019, MIS Q. Executive.

[41]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Vural Özdemir,et al.  Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, "The Internet of Things" and Next-Generation Technology Policy. , 2018, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[43]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[44]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[45]  Christine E. Welch,et al.  Incentive and desire: covering a missing category , 2006 .

[46]  J. Dutton,et al.  Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work , 2001 .

[47]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[48]  Christian Kreiner,et al.  Integrated design for tackling safety and security challenges of smart products and digital manufacturing , 2017 .

[49]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  A Double Helix Metaphor for Use and Usefulness in Informing Systems , 2007, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[50]  S. Kraemer.  Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[51]  Amedeo Giorgi,et al.  Contemporary schools of metascience , 1968 .

[52]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[53]  W. Filho.  The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line , 2013 .

[54]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[55]  Henning Trsek,et al.  Analysis of the Cyber-Security of industry 4.0 technologies based on RAMI 4.0 and identification of requirements , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[56]  Jane E. Dutton,et al.  Job Crafting and Cultivating Positive Meaning and Identity in Work , 2013 .

[57]  Steven L. Alter.  Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  P. Bednar,et al.  CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS: A MULTIPERSPECTIVE INQUIRY INTO EMERGENCE OF COMPLEX SOCIO-CULTURAL SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[59]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Double Helix Relationships in Use and Design of Informing Systems: Lessons to Learn from Phenomenology and Hermeneutics , 2007, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[60]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[61]  R. Paul.  Review of "The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdoms of systems" by Claudio Ciborra, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002 , 2005 .

[62]  A. Shantz,et al.  Purposeful leadership: what is it, what causes it, and does it matter? , 2017 .

[63]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[64]  M. Craven.  DOUBLE HELIX , 2020, Faculty Brat.

[65]  A. Khalili,et al.  Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate , 2016 .

[66]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems , 2006 .

[67]  Rob Kling,et al.  IT and organizational change in digital economies: a socio-technical approach , 1999, CSOC.

[68]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[69]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[70]  Frederik Ahlemann,et al.  Beyond Business-IT Alignment - Digital Business Strategies as a Paradigmatic Shift: A Review and Research Agenda , 2017, HICSS.

[71]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Book Review: The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization , 2016 .

[72]  A. McEwan.  Smart Working: Creating the Next Wave , 2013 .

[73]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[74]  Ia Ko.  Crafting a job: Creating optimal experiences at work , 2011 .

[75]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[76]  Christine E. Welch,et al.  Use and Redesign in IS: Double Helix Relationships? , 2007 .

[77]  Shih-Chieh Fang,et al.  Knowledge as a facilitator for enhancing innovation performance through total quality management , 2010 .

[78]  Bernhard Poerksen,et al.  The certainty of uncertainty : dialogues introducing constructivism , 2004 .

[79]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-Year Retrospective , 1999 .

[80]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  A Contextual Integration of Individual and Organizational Learning Perspectives as Part of IS Analysis , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[81]  L. Christman.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[82]  Peter Bednar,et al.  Excellence in practice through a socio-technical, open systems approach to process analysis and design , 2016 .

[83]  Kecheng Liu,et al.  Co-Design of Business and IT Systems—Introduction by Guest Editors , 2002, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[84]  Christine E. Welch,et al.  Stepping on the Cracks—Transcending the Certainties of Big Data Analytics , 2018, Organizing for the Digital World.

[85]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  An Explanatory Study on the Co-evolutionary Mechanisms of Business IT Alignment , 2017, ICIS.

[86]  Rana Tassabehji,et al.  The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[87]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[88]  Jean-Marc Salotti,et al.  Human Factors Issues for the Design of a Cobotic System , 2017 .

[89]  Anthony E. Cawkell.  The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems , 2002, J. Documentation.

[90]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Bookshelf - High Output Management, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization , 2006, IEEE Softw..

[91]  B. Claverie,et al.  La cobotique. La robotique soumise , 2013 .

[92]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  General System Theory , 1969 .

[93]  Xiao Xiao,et al.  The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance , 2019, MIS Q..

[94]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Conceptualizing the SocioTechnical (ST) Artifact , 2013 .

[95]  Andy Lake.  Smart Flexibility: Moving Smart and Flexible Working from Theory to Practice , 2013 .

[96]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in user social media acceptance within workspace: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[97]  R. Fincham.  Narratives of Success and Failure in Systems Development , 2002 .