Rule induction research implicitly assumes that after producing the rules from a dataset, these rules will be used directly by an expert system or a human user. In real-life applications, the situation may not be as simple as that, particularly, when the user of the rules is a human being. The human user almost always has some previous concepts or knowledge about the domain represented by the dataset. Naturally, he/she wishes to know how the new rules compare with his/her existing knowledge. In dynamic domains where the rules may change over time, it is important to know what the changes are. These aspects of research have largely been ignored in the past. With the increasing use of machine leaming tcclmiques in practical applications such as data mining, this issue of post analysis of rules warrants greater emphasis and attention. In this paper, we propose a technique to deal with this problem. A system has been implemented to perform the post analysis of classification rules genemted by systems such as C4.5. The proposed technique is general and highly interactive. It will be particularly useful in data mining and data analysis.
[1]
Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.
Pattern Recognition as Rule-Guided Inductive Inference
,
1980,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[2]
Stan Matwin,et al.
Using Qualitative Models to Guide Inductive Learning
,
1993,
ICML.
[3]
H. Zimmermann,et al.
Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications
,
1993
.
[4]
Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro,et al.
The interestingness of deviations
,
1994
.
[5]
Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro,et al.
KDD-93: Progress and Challenges in Knowledge Discovery in Databases
,
1994,
AI Mag..
[6]
Julio Ortega,et al.
Flexibly Exploiting Prior Knowledge in Empirical Learning
,
1995,
IJCAI.
[7]
Abraham Silberschatz,et al.
On Subjective Measures of Interestingness in Knowledge Discovery
,
1995,
KDD.