Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses

Auditory-nerve fibers demonstrate dynamic response properties in that they adapt to rapid changes in sound level, both at the onset and offset of a sound. These dynamic response properties affect temporal coding of stimulus modulations that are perceptually relevant for many sounds such as speech and music. Temporal dynamics have been well characterized in auditory-nerve fibers from normal-hearing animals, but little is known about the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on these dynamics. This study examined the effects of noise-induced hearing loss on the temporal dynamics in auditory-nerve fiber responses from anesthetized chinchillas. Post-stimulus-time histograms were computed from responses to 50-ms tones presented at characteristic frequency and 30 dB above fiber threshold. Several response metrics related to temporal dynamics were computed from post-stimulus-time histograms and were compared between normal-hearing and noise-exposed animals. Results indicate that noise-exposed auditory-nerve fibers show significantly reduced response latency, increased onset response and percent adaptation, faster adaptation after onset, and slower recovery after offset. The decrease in response latency only occurred in noise-exposed fibers with significantly reduced frequency selectivity. These changes in temporal dynamics have important implications for temporal envelope coding in hearing-impaired ears, as well as for the design of dynamic compression algorithms for hearing aids.

[1]  B C Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[2]  Single auditory nerve fiber and action potential latencies in normal and noise-treated chinchillas , 1979, Hearing Research.

[3]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[4]  B. May,et al.  Relationship between the auditory brainstem response and auditory nerve thresholds in cats with hearing loss , 2001, Hearing Research.

[5]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Heil.  First-spike latency of auditory neurons revisited , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Joseph P. Walton,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss alters recovery from short-term adaptation in the C57BL/6 mouse , 1995, Hearing Research.

[8]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[9]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate- and phase-level functions , 1984, Hearing Research.

[11]  Andrew S. French,et al.  Frequency response functions and information capacities of paired spider mechanoreceptor neurons , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  R. Smith.  Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. , 1977 .

[13]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Representation of the Pitch of Complex Tones in the Auditory Nerve , 2007 .

[14]  Jan Benda,et al.  The Origin of Adaptation in the Auditory Pathway of Locusts Is Specific to Cell Type and Function , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Eric D Young,et al.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  P. Manis,et al.  Short-term synaptic depression and recovery at the mature mammalian endbulb of Held synapse in mice. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[18]  M Ulfendahl,et al.  Acoustic overstimulation increases outer hair cell Ca2+ concentrations and causes dynamic contractions of the hearing organ. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory-nerve fibers , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Predicting Speech Intelligibility from a Population of Neurons , 2003, NIPS.

[21]  Dexter R. F. Irvine,et al.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: Distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers , 2008, Hearing Research.

[22]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift , 1984, Hearing Research.

[24]  Evoked response ‘forward masking’ patterns in chinchillas with temporary hearing loss , 1987, Hearing Research.

[25]  R L Smith,et al.  Conservation of adapting components in auditory-nerve responses. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Laurel H Carney,et al.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  B. Suresh Krishna,et al.  A Unified Mechanism for Spontaneous-Rate and First-Spike Timing in the Auditory Nerve , 2002, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  Laurel H Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Response modulation of auditory-nerve fibers by am stimuli: effects of average intensity , 1980, Hearing Research.

[30]  S. Shamma.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  D. Irvine,et al.  First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[34]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Changes Across Time in Spike Rate and Spike Amplitude of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Niparko,et al.  Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: Morphologic alterations in endbulbs of held , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  P. Dallos,et al.  Latency of whole-nerve action potentials: influence of hair-cell normalcy. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Comments on ‘Very rapid adaptation in the guinea pig auditory nerve’ by Yates, G.K. et al., 1985 , 1986, Hearing Research.

[40]  Laurel H. Carney,et al.  Spatiotemporal encoding of sound level: Models for normal encoding and recruitment of loudness , 1994, Hearing Research.

[41]  P Dallos,et al.  Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Michael G. Heinz,et al.  Envelope Coding in Auditory Nerve Fibers Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[43]  Tonotopic Distribution of Short-Term Adaptation Properties in the Cochlear Nerve of Normal and Acoustically Overexposed Chicks , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[44]  Thomas Voets,et al.  Calcium Dependence of Exocytosis and Endocytosis at the Cochlear Inner Hair Cell Afferent Synapse , 2001, Neuron.

[45]  G E Loeb,et al.  Spatial cross-correlation , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[46]  M. M. Gibson,et al.  Initial discharge latency and threshold considerations for some neurons in cochlear nuclear complex of the cat. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  NONLINEAR COCHLEAR SIGNAL PROCESSING AND PHONEME PERCEPTION , 2008 .

[48]  J. Doucet,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons , 1991, Hearing Research.

[49]  Robert L. Smith.  Comments on ‘Very rapid adaptation in the guinea pig auditory nerve’ (by G.K. Yates D. Robertson and B.M. Johnstone, 1985, Hearing Research 17, 1–12) , 1985, Hearing Research.

[50]  L. Maler,et al.  Spike-Frequency Adaptation Separates Transient Communication Signals from Background Oscillations , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Michael G. Heinz,et al.  Computational Modeling of Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2010 .

[52]  P. Heil,et al.  Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  L. Carney,et al.  Perception of Temporally Processed Speech by Listeners with Hearing Impairment , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[54]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Very rapid adaptation in the guinea pig auditory nerve , 1985, Hearing Research.

[55]  Mario A Ruggero,et al.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[57]  Vit Drga,et al.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Across-Fiber Coding of Temporal Fine-Structure: Effects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss on Auditory-Nerve Responses , 2010 .

[59]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation , 1996 .

[60]  W. Mann,et al.  Alteration of the Calcium Content in Inner Hair Cells of the Cochlea of the Guinea Pig after Acute Noise Trauma with and without Application of the Organic Calcium Channel Blocker Diltiazem , 1999, ORL.

[61]  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli,et al.  Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[63]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.