The influence of selection test type on applicant reactions to employment testing

The impact of employment selection devices on the reactions of simulated applicants was investigated. In Study 1, 141 subjects were “failed” on either a biographical inventory, a cognitive ability test, a trainability test or a work sample test. Subjects rejected on the basis of biographical inventory scores perceived the test as less difficult, coped more adaptively, and had better moods than subjects tested with the other instruments. The biographical inventory was also seen as more fakable, but less amenable to improvement through feedback or training than the other devices. We hypothesized that differences among tests in cognitive demand is a primary cause of differences in applicant reaction. In Study 2 (N=151) the comparison of the effects of two biographical inventories to two cognitive ability tests supported our hypothesis, and replicated the findings of Study 1 across failure and success conditions.

[1]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  The Validity and Fairness of Alternatives to Cognitive Tests , 1994 .

[2]  C Peterson,et al.  Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: theory and evidence. , 1984, Psychological review.

[3]  M. Seligman,et al.  Attributional styles and life events in the classroom: vulnerability and invulnerability to depressive mood reactions. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and traitlike characteristics. , 1986 .

[6]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses , 1989 .

[7]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[8]  Howard E. Miller,et al.  Recruiter and Job Influences on Candidates for Employment , 1983 .

[9]  H. Mano,et al.  The Structure and Intensity of Emotional Experiences: Method and Context Convergence. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  A. Kluger,et al.  Faking Biodata Tests Are Option-Keyed Instruments More Resistant? , 1991 .

[11]  W. Dodd.  CHAPTER 9 – ATTITUDES TOWARD ASSESSMENT CENTER PROGRAMS , 1977 .

[12]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Adverse impact and examinee attitudes. , 1977 .

[13]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Applicant decisions in the employment interview. , 1976 .

[14]  Michael Ross,et al.  Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. , 1982 .

[15]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Variables affecting perceptions of invasion of privacy in a personnel selection situation. , 1980 .

[16]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .

[17]  William C. Byham,et al.  Applying the assessment center method , 1977 .

[18]  R. Koestner,et al.  Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. , 1987 .

[19]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[21]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Excuses: their effective role in the negotiation of reality. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  John W. Jones.  Assessing privacy invasiveness of psychological test items: Job relevant versus clinical measures of integrity , 1991 .

[23]  M. Taylor,et al.  The college recruitment interview: Topical content and applicant reactions. , 1984 .

[24]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[25]  R. Reilly,et al.  VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES , 1982 .

[26]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .