The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment

How does the relationship between founding team composition and venture performance depend on the venture's strategy and business environment? Using data from a novel survey of 2,067 firms, we show that while diverse founding teams tend to exhibit higher performance, this is not universally true. We find that founding teams that are diverse are likely to achieve high performance in a competitive commercialization environment. On the other hand, technically focused founding teams are aligned with a cooperative commercialization environment and when the enterprise pursues an innovation strategy. These results are robust to corrections for endogenous team formation concerns. The findings suggest that ventures cannot ignore founding team composition and expect to later professionalize their top management teams to align with their strategy and environment.

[1]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion , 1993 .

[2]  James J. Anton,et al.  Start-ups, Spin-offs, and Internal Projects , 1995 .

[3]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Cash-Out or Flameout! Opportunity Cost and Entrepreneurial Strategy: Theory, and Evidence from the Information Security Industry , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Steven Klepper,et al.  High-Tech Entrepreneurship , 2011, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Organizational Roles and Transitions to Entrepreneurship Организационные роли и переходы к предпринимательству , 2005 .

[6]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship Between Top , 2002 .

[7]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[8]  David H. Hsu.  What Do Entrepreneurs Pay for Venture Capital Affiliation? , 2002 .

[9]  M. Diane Burton,et al.  7. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation , 2002 .

[10]  Sara L. Keck.  Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context , 1997 .

[11]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[13]  Manju Puri,et al.  The Interaction between Product Market and Financing Strategy: The Role of Venture Capital , 1999 .

[14]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[15]  N. Carter,et al.  The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs , 2003 .

[16]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[17]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[18]  M. Diane Burton,et al.  Leaving a Legacy: Position Imprints and Successor Turnover in Young Firms , 2007 .

[19]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[20]  R. Katila,et al.  Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals , 2008 .

[21]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence , 1983 .

[22]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  A Garage and an Idea: What More Does an Entrepreneur Need? , 2005 .

[23]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads , 2001 .

[24]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[25]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance , 2006 .

[26]  C. Ai,et al.  Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models , 2004 .

[27]  E. Lazear.  Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[28]  David Miller,et al.  Some Organizational Consequences of Ceo Succession , 1993 .

[29]  W. A. Sahlman,et al.  The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations , 1990 .

[30]  S. Mezias,et al.  An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1992 .

[31]  David H. Hsu,et al.  Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT , 2007 .

[32]  J. Lerner,et al.  With a Little Help from My (Random) Friends: Success and Failure in Post-Business School Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[33]  Benjamin L. Hallen.  The Causes and Consequences of the Initial Network Positions of New Organizations: From Whom Do Entrepreneurs Receive Investments? , 2008 .

[34]  D. Hambrick.  Upper Echelons Theory: An Update , 2007 .

[35]  G. Carroll,et al.  Errata: Organizational Mortality in the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland: An Ecological Approach , 1982 .

[36]  Manju Puri,et al.  Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[37]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  Indicators for Dating Business Cycles: Cross-History Selection and Comparisons , 2010 .

[38]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Are You Experienced or Are You Talented?: When Does Innate Talent versus Experience Explain Entrepreneurial Performance? , 2012 .

[39]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[40]  Scott Shane,et al.  Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures , 2006 .

[41]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[42]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[43]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability: Evidence from the Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[44]  Charles E. Eesley,et al.  Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action , 2006 .

[45]  Warren Boeker,et al.  ENTREPRENEURIAL TRANSITIONS: FACTORS INFLUENCING FOUNDER DEPARTURE , 2002 .

[46]  Ron S. Jarmin,et al.  Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young , 2013, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[47]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[48]  Paul A. Gompers.  Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital , 1995 .

[49]  Susan E. Woodward,et al.  The Burden of the Nondiversifiable Risk of Entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[50]  R. Burt.  Attachment, decay, and social network , 2001 .

[51]  April M. Franco,et al.  Swift and Smart: The Moderating Effects of Technological Capabilities on the Market Pioneering-Firm Survival Relationship , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Kimberly S. Jaussi,et al.  Functional Background Identity, Diversity, and Individual Performance in Cross-Functional Teams , 2003 .

[53]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[54]  Juan B. Roure,et al.  Linking Prefunding Factors and High-Technology Venture Success: An Exploratory Study , 1986 .

[55]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[56]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[57]  F. Rothaermel.  Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .

[58]  David H. Hsu.  Venture Capitalists and Cooperative Start-Up Commercialization Strategy , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[59]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships , 2008 .

[60]  David H. Hsu.  Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding , 2007 .

[61]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[62]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Technological Discontinuties, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Commitments , 1994, Industrial and Corporate Change.

[63]  Richard L. Priem.  Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance , 1990 .

[64]  R. Merges,et al.  The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry , 2003 .

[65]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Chapter 8 Technology commercialization: Cooperative versus competitive strategies , 2008 .

[66]  M. Diane Burton,et al.  Founding the Future: Path Dependence in the Evolution of Top Management Teams from Founding to IPO , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[67]  Anisya S. Thomas,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF STRATEGY - MANAGER COALIGNMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1991 .

[68]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[69]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  Top Management Teams, Strategy and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analytic Examination , 2006 .

[70]  Warren Boeker,et al.  Strategic Change: The Effects Of Founding And History , 1989 .

[71]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[72]  Michael Dowling,et al.  Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience , 1995 .

[73]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[74]  James N. Baron,et al.  Engineering Bureaucracy: The Genesis of Formal Policies, Positions, and Structures in High-Technology Firms , 1999 .

[75]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Early Teams: The Impact of Team Demography on VC Financing and Going Public , 2007 .