Real-time X-ray-based 4D image guidance of minimally invasive interventions

ObjectiveA new technology is introduced that enables real-time 4D (three spatial dimensions plus time) X-ray guidance for vascular catheter interventions with acceptable levels of ionising radiation.MethodsThe enabling technology is a combination of low-dose tomographic data acquisition with novel compressed sensing reconstruction and use of prior image information. It was implemented in a prototype set-up consisting of a gantry-based flat detector system. In pigs (n = 5) angiographic interventions were simulated. Radiation dosage on a per time base was compared with the “gold standard” of X-ray projection imaging.ResultsContrary to current image guidance methods that lack permanent 4D updates, the spatial position of interventional instruments could be resolved in continuous, spatial 4D guidance; the movement of the guide wire as well as the expansion of stents could be precisely tracked in 3D angiographic road maps. Dose rate was 23.8 μGy/s, similar to biplane standard angiographic fluoroscopy, which has a dose rate of 20.6 μGy/s.ConclusionReal-time 4D X-ray image-guidance with acceptable levels of radiation has great potential to significantly influence the field of minimally invasive medicine by allowing faster and safer interventions and by enabling novel, much more complex procedures for vascular and oncological minimally invasive therapy.Key Points• Real-time 4D (three spatial dimensions plus time) angiographic intervention guidance is realistic.• Low-dose tomographic data acquisition with special compressed sensing-based algorithms is enabled.• Compared with 4D CT fluoroscopy, this method reduces radiation to acceptable levels.• Once implemented, vascular interventions may become safer and faster.• More complex intervention approaches may be developed.

[1]  Josep Rodés-Cabau,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches , 2012, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[2]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) , 2008, SPIE BiOS.

[3]  Drazenko Babic,et al.  Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  K S Pentlow,et al.  Radiation dose in CT. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  R Razavi,et al.  Toward true 3D visualization of active catheters using compressed sensing , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Michael Knaup,et al.  Hyperfast parallel-beam and cone-beam backprojection using the cell general purpose hardware. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  Graeme C. Mc Kinnon,et al.  Towards Imaging the Beating Heart Usefully with a Conventional CT Scanner , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Jie Tang,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) and applications in X-ray computed tomography , 2010 .

[9]  M. Kachelriess,et al.  Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Michael Grasruck,et al.  Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization , 2006, European Radiology.

[11]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Michael Grasruck,et al.  Evaluation of image quality and dose on a flat-panel CT-scanner , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  A L Oberg,et al.  Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. , 2001, Radiology.

[14]  Jie Tang,et al.  Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Stephan Zangos,et al.  Accuracy and speed of robotic assisted needle interventions using a modern cone beam computed tomography intervention suite: a phantom study , 2012, European Radiology.

[17]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Sub-Nyquist acquisition and constrained reconstruction in time resolved angiography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[18]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[19]  Jie Tang,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  Jie Tang,et al.  Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  M. Vannier,et al.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? , 2009, Inverse problems.

[22]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  Real-Time 3D Fluoroscopy-Guided Large Core Needle Biopsy of Renal Masses: A Critical Early Evaluation According to the IDEAL Recommendations , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[23]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  A Probabilistic and RIPless Theory of Compressed Sensing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[24]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[25]  M. Bock,et al.  MR‐guided intravascular interventions: Techniques and applications , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  B. Wood,et al.  CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator. , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.