Use of self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations in locomotion.

In 8 experiments, the authors examined the use of representations of self-to-object or object-to-object spatial relations during locomotion. Participants learned geometrically regular or irregular layouts of objects while standing at the edge or in the middle and then pointed to objects while blindfolded in 3 conditions: before turning (baseline), after rotating 240 degrees (updating), and after disorientation (disorientation). The internal consistency of pointing in the disorientation condition was equivalent to that in the updating condition when participants learned the regular layout. The internal consistency of pointing was disrupted by disorientation when participants learned the irregular layout. However, when participants who learned the regular layout were instructed to use self-to-object spatial relations, the effect of disorientation on pointing consistency appeared. When participants who learned the irregular layout at the periphery of the layout were instructed to use object-to-object spatial relations, the effect of disorientation disappeared. These results suggest that people represent both self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations and primarily use object-to-object spatial representation in a regular layout and self-to-object spatial representation in an irregular layout.

[1]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout , 2008, Cognition.

[3]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[5]  C. Freksa,et al.  Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge , 1998 .

[6]  M. Sholl,et al.  Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[7]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  David Waller,et al.  Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Reza Modarres,et al.  Spatial memory during progressive disorientation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[14]  D. R. Montello A New Framework for Understanding the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in Large-Scale Environments , 1998 .

[15]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems , 1998 .

[16]  M. Jeanne Sholl,et al.  The Role of a Self-Reference System in Spatial Navigation , 2001, COSIT.

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[18]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[21]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.