Optical trait indicators for remote sensing of plant species composition: Predictive power and seasonal variability

Abstract Most plant species feature similar biochemical compositions and thus similar spectral signals. Still, empirical evidence suggests that the spectral discrimination of species and plant assemblages is possible. Success depends on the presence or absence of faint but detectable differences in biochemical (e.g., pigments, leaf water and dry matter content) and structural properties (e.g., leaf area, angle, and leaf structure), i.e., optical traits. A systematic analysis of the contributions and spatio-temporal variability of optical traits for the remote sensing of organismic vegetation patterns has not yet been conducted. We thus use time series of optical trait values retrieved from the reflectance signal using physical models (optical trait indicators, OTIs) to answer the following questions: How are optical traits related among patterns of floristic composition and reflectance? How variable are these relations in space and time? Are OTIs suitable predictors of plant species composition? We conducted a case study of three temperate open study sites with semi-natural vegetation. The canopy reflectance of permanent vegetation plots was measured on multiple dates over the vegetation period using a field spectrometer. We recorded the cover fractions of all plant species found in the vegetation plots and extracted gradients of species composition from these data. The physical PROSAIL leaf and canopy optical properties model was inverted with random forest regression models to retrieve time series of OTIs for each plot from the reflectance spectra. We analyzed these data sets using correlation analyses. This approach allowed us to assess the distribution of optical traits across gradients of species composition. The predictive performance of OTIs was tested in relation to canopy reflectance using random forest models. OTIs showed pronounced relationships with floristic patterns in all three study sites. These relationships were subject to considerable temporal variability. Such variability was driven by short-term vegetation dynamics introduced by local resource stress. In 72% of all cases OTIs out-performed the original canopy reflectance spectra as indicators of plant species composition. OTIs are also easier to interpret in an ecological sense than spectral bands or features. We thus conclude that optical traits retrieved from reflectance data have a high indicative value for ecological research and applications.

[1]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical change. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Extraction of vegetation biophysical parameters by inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL models on sugar beet canopy reflectance data. Application to TM and AVIRIS sensors , 1995 .

[3]  Alicia Palacios-Orueta,et al.  Ecosystem functional assessment based on the "optical type" concept and self-similarity patterns: An application using MODIS-NDVI time series autocorrelation , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[4]  J. C. Price How unique are spectral signatures , 1994 .

[5]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Comparative analysis of different retrieval methods for mapping grassland leaf area index using airborne imaging spectroscopy , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  M. Hill,et al.  Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique , 1980 .

[7]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[8]  P. Treitz,et al.  Image classification of a northern peatland complex using spectral and plant community data , 2003 .

[9]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  An evaluation of remote sensing derived soil pH and average spring groundwater table for ecological assessments , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[10]  Christian Schuster,et al.  Evaluating an Intra-Annual Time Series for Grassland Classification—How Many Acquisitions and What Seasonal Origin Are Optimal? , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Mapping of continuous floristic gradients in grasslands using hyperspectral imagery , 2004 .

[12]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[13]  G. Asner Biophysical and Biochemical Sources of Variability in Canopy Reflectance , 1998 .

[14]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Canopy phylogenetic, chemical and spectral assembly in a lowland Amazonian forest. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[15]  José M. C. Pereira,et al.  Spectral discrimination of giant reed (Arundo donax L.): A seasonal study in riparian areas , 2013 .

[16]  R. Kokaly,et al.  Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies , 2009 .

[17]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  ssessing floristic composition with multispectral sensors — A comparison based n monotemporal and multiseasonal field spectra , 2012 .

[18]  S. Ustin,et al.  The role of environmental context in mapping invasive plants with hyperspectral image data , 2008 .

[19]  Michela Marignani,et al.  Spatial scale and sampling size affect the concordance between remotely sensed information and plant community discrimination in restoration monitoring , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  Susan L Ustin,et al.  Remote sensing of plant functional types. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[21]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Hyperspectral Time Series Analysis of Native and Invasive Species in Hawaiian Rainforests , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[22]  Nigel M. Trodd Analysis and Representation of Heathland Vegetation from Near-Ground Level Remotely-Sensed Data , 1996 .

[23]  J. Evans,et al.  Modeling Species Distribution and Change Using Random Forest , 2011 .

[24]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Estimating leaf functional traits by inversion of PROSPECT: Assessing leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area in mixed mountainous forest , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[25]  S. Plantureux,et al.  Variation in leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species , 2005 .

[26]  Caspar A. Mücher,et al.  Integrating remote sensing in Natura 2000 habitat monitoring: prospects on the way forward , 2011 .

[27]  M. Schlerf,et al.  Suitability and adaptation of PROSAIL radiative transfer model for hyperspectral grassland studies , 2013 .

[28]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[29]  Björn Waske,et al.  Classifying Multilevel Imagery From SAR and Optical Sensors by Decision Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Ghislain Vieilledent,et al.  When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? , 2011 .

[31]  Benoit Rivard,et al.  Variability in leaf optical properties of Mesoamerican trees and the potential for species classification. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[32]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Trait Estimation in Herbaceous Plant Assemblages from in situ Canopy Spectra , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[33]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimating Canopy Characteristics from Remote Sensing Observations: Review of Methods and Associated Problems , 2008 .

[34]  H. Feilhauer,et al.  Relating canopy reflectance to the vegetation composition of mountainous grasslands in the Greater Caucasus , 2013 .

[35]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[36]  France Gerard,et al.  Characterization of a Highly Biodiverse Floodplain Meadow Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing within a Plant Functional Trait Framework , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Henry Clifton Sorby,et al.  XXII. On comparative vegetable Chromatology , 1873, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[38]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation for Nature Conservation , 2014 .

[39]  W. Verhoef Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: The SAIL model , 1984 .

[40]  Gregory A. Carter,et al.  Responses of leaf spectral reflectance to plant stress. , 1993 .

[41]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Mapping grassland leaf area index with airborne hyperspectral imagery : a comparison study of statistical approaches and inversion of radiative transfer models , 2011 .

[42]  Valérie Demarez,et al.  Seasonal variation of leaf chlorophyll content of a temperate forest. Inversion of the PROSPECT model , 1999 .

[43]  S. Ustin,et al.  A Comparison of Spatial and Spectral Image Resolution for Mapping Invasive Plants in Coastal California , 2007, Environmental management.

[44]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Optical remote sensing and the retrieval of terrestrial vegetation bio-geophysical properties - A review , 2015 .

[45]  M. Vohland,et al.  Estimating structural and biochemical parameters for grassland from spectroradiometer data by radiative transfer modelling (PROSPECT+SAIL) , 2008 .

[46]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy as a tool for mapping Ellenberg indicator values , 2005 .

[47]  Hannes Feilhauer,et al.  On variable relations between vegetation patterns and canopy reflectance , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[48]  J. Verrelst,et al.  Mapping a priori defined plant associations using remotely sensed vegetation characteristics , 2014 .

[49]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[50]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[51]  Erich-Christian Oerke,et al.  Quantifying empirical relations between planted species mixtures and canopy reflectance with PROTEST , 2010 .

[52]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Mapping of aggregated floodplain plant communities using image fusion of CASI and LiDAR data , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[53]  Steffen Boch,et al.  NIRS meets Ellenberg's indicator values: Prediction of moisture and nitrogen values of agricultural grassland vegetation by means of near-infrared spectral characteristics , 2012 .

[54]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[55]  C. A. Mücher,et al.  Environmental science: Agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space , 2015, Nature.

[56]  D. Roberts,et al.  Spectral changes with leaf aging in Amazon caatinga , 1998, Trees.

[57]  S. Ollinger Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[58]  B. Rivard,et al.  Patterns of Leaf Biochemical and Structural Properties of Cerrado Life Forms: Implications for Remote Sensing , 2015, PloS one.

[59]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Inversion of a radiative transfer model for estimating vegetation LAI and chlorophyll in a heterogeneous grassland , 2008 .

[60]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Mapping spatio-temporal variation of grassland quantity and quality using MERIS data and the PROSAIL model , 2012 .

[61]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Why confining to vegetation indices? Exploiting the potential of improved spectral observations using radiative transfer models , 2011, Remote Sensing.

[62]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests , 2009 .

[63]  Milo E. Richmond,et al.  Field Determination of Optimal Dates for the Discrimination of Invasive Wetland Plant Species Using Derivative Spectral Analysis , 2005 .