Do spins have directions?

The standard Bloch sphere representation has been recently generalized to describe not only systems of arbitrary dimension, but also their measurements, in what has been called the extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics. This model, which offers a solution to the longstanding measurement problem, is based on the hidden-measurement interpretation of quantum mechanics, according to which the Born rule results from our lack of knowledge of the measurement interaction that each time is actualized between the measuring apparatus and the measured entity. In this article, we present the extended Bloch model and use it to investigate, more specifically, the nature of the quantum spin entities and of their relation to our three-dimensional Euclidean theater. Our analysis shows that spin eigenstates cannot generally be associated with directions in the Euclidean space, but only with generalized directions in the Blochean space, which apart from the special case of spin one-half entities, is a space of higher dimensionality. Accordingly, spin entities have to be considered as genuine non-spatial entities. We also show, however, that specific vectors can be identified in the Blochean theater that are isomorphic to the Euclidean space directions, and therefore representative of them, and that spin eigenstates always have a predetermined orientation with respect to them. We use the details of our results to put forward a new view of realism, that we call multiplex realism, providing a specific framework with which to interpret the human observations and understanding of the component parts of the world. Elements of reality can be represented in different theaters, one being our customary Euclidean space, and another one the quantum realm, revealed to us through our sophisticated experiments, whose elements of reality, in the quantum jargon, are the eigenvalues and eigenstates. Our understanding of the component parts of the world can then be guided by looking for the possible connections, in the form of partial morphisms, between the different representations, which is precisely what we do in this article with regard to spin entities.

[1]  D. Aerts,et al.  The missing elements of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the E.P.R. paradox situation , 1984 .

[2]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment : A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities , 1982 .

[3]  N. Khaneja,et al.  Characterization of the Positivity of the Density Matrix in Terms of the Coherence Vector Representation , 2003, quant-ph/0302024.

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Physics: A General Realistic and Operational Approach , 2001, quant-ph/0105109.

[5]  Gerald Badurek,et al.  Verification of coherent spinor rotation of fermions , 1975 .

[6]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic macroscopic physical entity with a three-dimensional Hilbert space description , 2001 .

[7]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[8]  G. Kimura The Bloch Vector for N-Level Systems , 2003, quant-ph/0301152.

[9]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic classical laboratory situation violating the Bell inequalities with 2-2 , 1991 .

[10]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Origin of the Non-Classical Character of the Quantum Probability Model , 1987 .

[11]  J. Eberly,et al.  N-Level Coherence Vector and Higher Conservation Laws in Quantum Optics and Quantum Mechanics , 1981 .

[12]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[13]  L. Mlodinow,et al.  THE GRAND DESIGN , 2010 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality , 1999 .

[15]  Alisa Bokulich,et al.  Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism , 2008 .

[16]  B. Coecke A hidden measurement representation for quantum entities described by finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces , 1995 .

[17]  Otto Stern,et al.  Das magnetische Moment des Silberatoms , 1922 .

[18]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  Théorie mathématique de la lumière , 1889 .

[19]  U. Bonse,et al.  Test of a single crystal neutron interferometer , 1974 .

[20]  Ph. A. Martin,et al.  Spin precession revisited , 1994 .

[21]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[22]  A. Gleason Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[23]  W. W. Hansen,et al.  Nuclear Induction , 2011 .

[24]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  AN ATTEMPT TO IMAGINE PARTS OF THE REALITY OF THE MICRO-WORLD , 1990 .

[25]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem , 2014, 1404.2429.

[26]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models , 2011, 1112.4045.

[27]  Diederik Aerts The Unification of Personal Presents: A Dialogue of Different World Views , 2001 .

[28]  Stathis Psilos Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds , 2005 .

[29]  Javier Sánchez Cañizares,et al.  Review of S. Hawking – L. Mlodinow, The Grand Design, Bantam Books, New York 2010. Group of Research CRYF (Science, Reason, and Faith). University of Navarra , 2011 .

[30]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[31]  B. Coecke Generalization of the proof on the existence of hidden measurements to experiments with an infinite set of outcomes , 1995 .

[32]  K. Życzkowski,et al.  Geometry of the Set of Mixed Quantum States: An Apophatic Approach , 2011, 1112.2347.

[33]  K. Lendi,et al.  Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications , 1987 .

[34]  M. S. D. Bianchi God May Not Play Dice, But Human Observers Surely Do , 2012, 1208.0674.

[35]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Unreasonable Success of Quantum Probability I: Quantum Measurements as Uniform Fluctuations , 2014, 1401.2647.

[36]  A. Aspect Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever , 1999, Nature.

[37]  J. Worrall Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?* , 1989 .

[38]  Diederik Aerts The Description of Joint Quantum Entities and the Formulation of a Paradox , 2000 .

[39]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[40]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics: Explaining superposition, interference, and entanglement , 2015, 1504.04781.

[41]  F. Mezei Zeeman energy, interference and Neutron Spin Echo: A minimal theory , 1988 .

[42]  H. Rauch NEUTRON INTERFEROMETRIC TESTS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS , 1986 .

[43]  Andrzej Kossakowski,et al.  The Bloch-Vector Space for N-Level Systems: the Spherical-Coordinate Point of View , 2005, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[44]  Arvind,et al.  A generalized Pancharatnam geometric phase formula for three-level quantum systems , 1996, quant-ph/9605042.

[45]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery- view of reality 1 , 1998 .

[46]  R. Jozsa,et al.  A Complete Classification of Quantum Ensembles Having a Given Density Matrix , 1993 .