CtIP-Mediated Fork Protection Synergizes with BRCA1 to Suppress Genomic Instability upon DNA Replication Stress.

[1]  V. Costanzo,et al.  SAMHD1 acts at stalled replication forks to prevent interferon induction , 2018, Nature.

[2]  A. Sartori,et al.  A Short BRCA2-Derived Cell-Penetrating Peptide Targets RAD51 Function and Confers Hypersensitivity toward PARP Inhibition , 2018, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  R. Verhaak,et al.  The Tandem Duplicator Phenotype Is a Prevalent Genome-Wide Cancer Configuration Driven by Distinct Gene Mutations , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  P. Pasero,et al.  Nucleases Acting at Stalled Forks: How to Reboot the Replication Program with a Few Shortcuts. , 2017, Annual review of genetics.

[5]  Edison T. Liu,et al.  Mechanism of tandem duplication formation in BRCA1 mutant cells , 2017, Nature.

[6]  Yue Ma,et al.  FAN1 interaction with ubiquitylated PCNA alleviates replication stress and preserves genomic integrity independently of BRCA2 , 2017, Nature Communications.

[7]  R. Rabadán,et al.  Restoration of Replication Fork Stability in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells by Inactivation of SNF2-Family Fork Remodelers. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[8]  L. Zou,et al.  MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  M. Lopes,et al.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells , 2017, Nature Communications.

[10]  A. Antoni,et al.  Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments , 2017, Molecular cell.

[11]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  R. S. Williams,et al.  CtIP/Ctp1/Sae2, molecular form fit for function. , 2017, DNA repair.

[13]  M. Altmeyer,et al.  Replication-Coupled Dilution of H4K20me2 Guides 53BP1 to Pre-replicative Chromatin , 2017, Cell reports.

[14]  P. Cejka,et al.  Phosphorylated CtIP Functions as a Co-factor of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Endonuclease in DNA End Resection. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[15]  R. Schwab,et al.  The DNA fibre technique - tracking helicases at work. , 2016, Methods.

[16]  S. Jackson,et al.  Coordinated nuclease activities counteract Ku at single-ended DNA double-strand breaks , 2016, Nature Communications.

[17]  M. Peter,et al.  Cullin3-KLHL15 ubiquitin ligase mediates CtIP protein turnover to fine-tune DNA-end resection , 2016, Nature Communications.

[18]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  FANCD2 Maintains Fork Stability in BRCA1/2-Deficient Tumors and Promotes Alternative End-Joining DNA Repair. , 2016, Cell reports.

[19]  S. Cantor,et al.  Replication Fork Stability Confers Chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient Cells , 2016, Nature.

[20]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  The Fanconi anaemia pathway: new players and new functions , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  K. Schlacher,et al.  A Selective Small Molecule DNA2 Inhibitor for Sensitization of Human Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy , 2016, EBioMedicine.

[22]  M. Porru,et al.  Targeting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Deficiencies with G-Quadruplex-Interacting Compounds , 2016, Molecular cell.

[23]  D. Cortez,et al.  The Replication Checkpoint Prevents Two Types of Fork Collapse without Regulating Replisome Stability. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[24]  Edward S. Miller,et al.  BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[25]  M. Lopes,et al.  FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks. , 2015, Cell reports.

[26]  M. Lopes,et al.  DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Raquel Herrador,et al.  Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  M. Lopes,et al.  Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  A. Richardson,et al.  BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  J. Rouse,et al.  Improved Genome Editing in Human Cell Lines Using the CRISPR Method , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  J. Walter,et al.  BRCA1 promotes unloading of the CMG helicase from a stalled DNA replication fork. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[32]  J. Yeo,et al.  CtIP mediates replication fork recovery in a FANCD2-regulated manner. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[33]  Jing He,et al.  CtIP maintains stability at common fragile sites and inverted repeats by end resection-independent endonuclease activity. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[34]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Catalytic and noncatalytic roles of the CtIP endonuclease in double-strand break end resection. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[35]  O. Murina,et al.  FANCD2 and CtIP cooperate to repair DNA interstrand crosslinks. , 2014, Cell reports.

[36]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Causes and consequences of replication stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  N. Mailand,et al.  ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA , 2013, Cell.

[38]  E. Brown,et al.  RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells , 2013, Genes & development.

[39]  N. Bec,et al.  FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of s phase checkpoint signaling. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[40]  L. Zou,et al.  DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[41]  J. Qin,et al.  ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. , 2013, Genes & development.

[42]  B. Eichman,et al.  Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. , 2013, Cell reports.

[43]  Rodrigo Bermejo,et al.  The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks , 2013, Front. Genet..

[44]  S. Jackson,et al.  A High-Throughput, Flow Cytometry-Based Method to Quantify DNA-End Resection in Mammalian Cells , 2012, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[45]  Hong Wu,et al.  A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[46]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[47]  A. Gingras,et al.  Interaction Proteomics Identify NEURL4 and the HECT E3 Ligase HERC2 as Novel Modulators of Centrosome Architecture* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[48]  A. Egashira,et al.  Double-Strand Break Repair-Independent Role for BRCA2 in Blocking Stalled Replication Fork Degradation by MRE11 , 2011, Cell.

[49]  B. Neumann,et al.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[50]  Stefano Ferrari,et al.  DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability , 2010, EMBO reports.

[51]  T. Helleday,et al.  Hydroxyurea-Stalled Replication Forks Become Progressively Inactivated and Require Two Different RAD51-Mediated Pathways for Restart and Repair , 2010, Molecular cell.

[52]  Phang-lang Chen,et al.  Expression of PCNA-binding domain of CtIP, a motif required for CtIP localization at DNA replication foci, causes DNA damage and activation of DNA damage checkpoint , 2009, Cell cycle.

[53]  Stephen P. Jackson,et al.  Human CtIP Mediates Cell Cycle Control of DNA End Resection and Double Strand Break Repair*S⃞ , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection , 2007, Nature.

[55]  F. Liu,et al.  Inactivation of CtIP Leads to Early Embryonic Lethality Mediated by G1 Restraint and to Tumorigenesis by Haploid Insufficiency , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[56]  Junjie Chen,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control Requires CtIP, a Phosphorylation-Dependent Binding Partner of BRCA1 C-Terminal Domains , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[57]  J. Diffley,et al.  Visualization of Altered Replication Dynamics after DNA Damage in Human Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  Anne M. Bowcock,et al.  Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[59]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.