The Effects of the Economic Downturn on Interdependent Buyer–Supplier Relationships

The management of strategic buyer–supplier relationships is a critical concern for sourcing managers. The selection of key suppliers and how relationships with these suppliers are managed and incentivized can dramatically affect the buying company's performance. While the extant literature focusing on industrial buyer–supplier relationships is significant, the severe economic downturn beginning in 2008 tested buyer–supplier relationships in unprecedented ways, yielding new insights. The research presented in this paper uses dyadic cases to investigate transformations within industrial relationships during the economic downturn. Propositions are formulated that focus on why and how firms responded to the downturn. Three primary types of relationships are identified. The results indicate variation in the ways buying companies managed their key supplier relationships during the downturn: some firms behaved more cooperatively and found ways to jointly confront the effects of the downturn, while others responded by behaving competitively to maximize their individual outcomes. The results further suggest that researchers need to revisit existing models of relationship development and dissolution to understand how these relationships evolve or devolve. The research also raises questions about the value of physical and human asset specificity, and social investments in curtailing opportunistic behavior in times of severe economic stress.

[1]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ , 2011 .

[2]  G. Hult,et al.  BUILDING THEORY ABOUT SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: SOME TOOLS FROM THE ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES , 2011 .

[3]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Strategic interdependence, governance effectiveness and supplier performance: A dyadic case study investigation and theory development , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance , 2010 .

[5]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China , 2009 .

[6]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Interpartner harmony in strategic alliances: managing commitment and forbearance , 2009 .

[7]  R. Gulati,et al.  Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer's Performance in Procurement Relationships , 2007 .

[8]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[9]  G. Hodgson,et al.  The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm , 2006 .

[10]  Michael G. Harvey,et al.  Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice , 2006 .

[11]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[12]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[13]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  John H. Bantham,et al.  A perspective of partnerships based on interdependence and dialectical theory , 2003 .

[15]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Supplier-supplier relationships and their implications for buyer-supplier relationships , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[16]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[17]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing , 2001 .

[18]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Social Exchange Theory and Research on Business-to-Business Relational Exchange , 2001 .

[19]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions , 2000 .

[20]  Sandy D. Jap.  Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer–Supplier Relationships , 1999 .

[21]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[22]  Susan Helper,et al.  The `close but adversarial' model of supplier relations in the U.S. auto industry , 1998 .

[23]  R. Handfield,et al.  Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective , 1998 .

[24]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[25]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Iterative triangulation: a theory development process using existing case studies , 1998 .

[26]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[27]  David T. Wilson.  An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships , 1995 .

[28]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Performance implications of buyer-supplier relationships in industrial markets: A transaction cost explanation , 1995 .

[29]  Ernest R. Cadotte,et al.  Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction: Research in a Simulated Channel Setting , 1994 .

[30]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[31]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[32]  David M. McCutcheon,et al.  Conducting case study research in operations management , 1993 .

[33]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships? , 1992 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[36]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .