Early mobilization of acute stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE To examine the early mobilization of acute stroke patients. DESIGN Postal survey. SETTING Thirteen health boards in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-nine health professionals of whom 39 were doctors, 39 nurses and 21 physiotherapists. RESULTS There was a lack of understanding and agreement across the three professions in terms of what was meant by 'early mobilization'. Further, the duration, frequency, intensity, risk/benefits and activities associated with early mobilization are undescribed despite clinical guidelines urging its use. Multi-disciplinary decision making regarding early mobilization was not self-evident. CONCLUSIONS (i) An evidence-base for early mobilization is required along with agreement on what physiological monitoring should be undertaken while early mobilization is on going; (ii) Health professionals need a greater awareness of the evidence linking stroke complications with patient immobilization and in particular in relation to pressure sores, painful shoulder and falls; (iii) The clinical decision to mobilize an acute stroke patient early should be made explicitly within a multi-disciplinary acute stroke team; (iv) There is an absolute need for further research into early mobilization in terms of intensity, duration, frequency, risks and benefits in relations to types of stroke of early mobilization. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Early mobilization in acute stroke care is recommended in a range of European, American and UK policy guidelines as a strategy to minimize or prevent complications. However the evidence-base to support early mobilization in acute stroke is missing. Health professionals require a research-based approach in order to deliver safe and effective early mobilization to acute stroke patients.

[1]  J. Slattery,et al.  How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. , 1997, Stroke.

[2]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: which aspects are most important? , 1999, Stroke.

[3]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Stroke unit treatment. 10-year follow-up. , 1999, Stroke.

[4]  P. Langhorne.  Measures to Improve Recovery in the Acute Phase of Stroke , 1999, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[5]  K R Lees,et al.  Acute stroke , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  G. Murray,et al.  Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. , 2000, Stroke.

[7]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  What are the components of effective stroke unit care? , 2002, Age and ageing.

[8]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  R. Teasell,et al.  An Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Grubb,et al.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association , 2003, Stroke.

[11]  H. Diener,et al.  European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management – Update 2003 , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[12]  Geoffrey Donnan,et al.  Inactive and Alone: Physical Activity Within the First 14 Days of Acute Stroke Unit Care , 2004, Stroke.

[13]  A. Rudd,et al.  Stroke Unit Care and Outcome: Results from the 2001 National Sentinel Audit of Stroke (England, Wales, and Northern Ireland) , 2005, Stroke.