The Families In Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): Primary Study Results

Objective: Social support and family ties are strong predictors of functional recovery after stroke; however, development of successful psychosocial intervention programs has been difficult. This study examined whether a family-systems intervention designed to influence social support and self-efficacy affects functional outcome in older stroke patients. Methods: Two hundred ninety-one community-residing survivors of ischemic stroke or nontraumatic cerebral hemorrhage from eight acute-care hospitals and rehabilitation centers were randomized to either psychosocial intervention (PSI) or usual care (UC). PSI involved up to 16 sessions conducted in the home by a mental health worker. Functional recovery (measured by the Barthel Index [BI] at 6 months postrandomization, inability to assess functioning because of illness or death) was the primary end point. Results: Functional recovery did not differ between UC and PSI in intention-to-treat analyses. In adjusted logistic regression, the odds of being functionally independent at 6 months was 60% higher in the intervention group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = .31). Subgroup analyses revealed that PSI may be more effective in subjects with better psychologic and cognitive functioning and who required less inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusion: This study does not provide evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial intervention to improve functional recovery in stroke. Although PSI showed greater improvement than UC, the differences were not statistically significant. BASRS = Boston Aphasia Severity Rating Scale; BI = Barthel Index; CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; FIRST = Families in Recovery from Stroke Trial; MMSE = Mini-Mental Status Exam; NIH = National Institutes of Health; NIHSSI = National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Index; PSI = psychosocial intervention; REFFI = recovery efficacy; RSS = received social support; SIS = Social Isolation Scale; TOAST = Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; UC = usual care.

[1]  D. Bishop,et al.  Prestroke family interaction as a predictor of stroke outcome. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  A M Jette,et al.  How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[3]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literature. , 1996, Age and ageing.

[4]  T. Craig,et al.  Informed consent as a form of volunteer bias. , 1985, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  M. Hammer,et al.  A Method for the Assessment of Social 8 Support Networks in Community Survey Research , 2003 .

[6]  Munehito Yoshida,et al.  Mobility and Muscle Strength Contralateral to Hemiplegia from Stroke: Benefit from Self-Training with Family Support , 2003, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.

[7]  Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke. , 1999, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[8]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[9]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[10]  M. Åsberg,et al.  The healthy control subject in psychiatric research: impulsiveness and volunteer bias , 1997, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[11]  G. Kinsella,et al.  Psychosocial readjustment in the spouses of aphasic patients. A comparative Survey of 79 subjects. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[13]  W R Clarke,et al.  Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke , 1999, Neurology.

[14]  H. Adams,et al.  Design of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  R L Evans,et al.  Family intervention after stroke: does counseling or education help? , 1988, Stroke.

[16]  T. Glass,et al.  Family Function and Stroke Recovery: A Review , 2003 .

[17]  L. Berkman,et al.  Beyond single indicators of social networks: a LISREL analysis of social ties among the elderly. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Ingegerd Nydevik,et al.  Sickness Impact after Stroke , 1992 .

[19]  J. Slattery,et al.  Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial , 1997, BMJ.

[20]  T. Glass,et al.  The quality and quantity of social support: stroke recovery as psycho-social transition. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[21]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[22]  B. Mattsson,et al.  Environmental enrichment alters nerve growth factor-induced gene A and glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA expression after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats , 1999, Neuroscience.

[23]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  L. Berkman,et al.  Psychosocial intervention in stroke: Families in Recovery from Stroke Trial (FIRST). , 2000, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[25]  Joel Stein,et al.  High-Intensity Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength, Self-Reported Function, and Disability in Long-Term Stroke Survivors , 2004, Stroke.

[26]  S. Studenski,et al.  The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  J Rodin,et al.  A longitudinal study of change in domain-specific self-efficacy among older adults. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[28]  D. Wade,et al.  Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  D B Matchar,et al.  Impact of Social Support on Outcome in First Stroke , 1993, Stroke.

[30]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  The influence of social support and perceived control on handicap and quality of life after stroke , 2001, Aging.

[31]  F. Gage,et al.  New nerve cells for the adult brain. , 1999, Scientific American.

[32]  A. Forster,et al.  Specialist nurse support for patients with stroke in the community: a randomised controlled trial , 1996, BMJ.

[33]  J. Friedland,et al.  Social support and psychosocial dysfunction after stroke: buffering effects in a community sample. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  L. Diller,et al.  Cognitive remediation in traumatic brain injury: update and issues. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  T. Brott,et al.  Improved Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale Using Video Training , 1994, Stroke.

[36]  J. Haselkorn,et al.  THE FAMILY'S ROLE IN STROKE REHABILITATION: A Review of the Literature , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[37]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[38]  D. Wade,et al.  Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. , 2000, Stroke.

[39]  D. Shinar,et al.  Screening for depression in stroke patients: the reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. , 1986, Stroke.

[40]  J. Friedland,et al.  Social support intervention after stroke: results of a randomized trial. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  T. Wyller,et al.  The Barthel ADL index one year after stroke: comparison between relatives' and occupational therapist's scores. , 1995, Age and ageing.

[42]  S. Haley,et al.  Predicting Long-term Outcome among Post-rehabilitation Stroke Patients , 1988, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[43]  R. Robinson,et al.  The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Screening for Post-Stroke Depression , 1989, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.