Experimental Investigation of Springback Variation in Forming of High Strength Steels

The use of high strength steels (HSSs) in automotive body structures is a prominent method of reducing vehicle weight as an alternative to use of aluminum and magnesium alloys. However, parts made of HSSs demonstrate more springback than parts made of mild steels do. Moreover, variations in the incoming material, friction, and other process conditions cause variations in the springback characteristics, which prevent the practical applicability of the springback prediction and compensation techniques. Consequently, it leads to amplified variations and quality issues during assembly of the stamped components. The objective of this study is to investigate and gain an understanding of the variation of springback in the forming of HSSs. Two sets of experiments were conducted to analyze the influence of the material property (dual-phase steels from different suppliers), lubrication, and blank holder pressure on the springback variation. The experimental results showed that the variation in the incoming blank material is the most important factor. In summary, the thicker the blank is, the less the springback variation. On the other hand, blanks without a coating show less springback variation. The application of lubricant helps us to reduce springback variation, although it actually increases the springback itself. The more uniform the friction condition, the less the springback variation. The influence of blank holder pressure on the springback variation is not distinguishable from the system-level noise in our experiment.

[1]  Zafer Tekiner,et al.  An experimental study on the examination of springback of sheet metals with several thicknesses and properties in bending dies , 2004 .

[2]  Karl D. Majeske,et al.  Identifying Sources of Variation in Sheet Metal Stamping , 2003 .

[3]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods , 1997 .

[4]  Trevor A. Dean,et al.  Modelling of springback in creep forming thick aluminum sheets , 2004 .

[5]  R. J. Eggert,et al.  Design Variation Simulation of Thick-walled Cylinders , 1995 .

[6]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  An offset finite element model and its applications in predicting sheet metal assembly variation , 1995 .

[7]  S. Solla,et al.  Consistent and Minimal Springback Using a Stepped Binder Force Trajectory and Neural Network Control , 2000 .

[8]  Kwansoo Chung,et al.  Spring-back evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic–kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions, part III: applications , 2005 .

[9]  Ulf Engel,et al.  Microforming—from basic research to its realization , 2002 .

[10]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Simulation of springback with the draw/bend test , 1999, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials. IPMM'99 (Cat. No.99EX296).

[11]  Z. T. Zhang,et al.  Effect of Process Variables and Material Properties on the Springback Behavior of 2D-Draw Bending Parts , 1995 .

[12]  Scott D. Button Determinant assembled stowage bins—a case study , 1999 .

[13]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback , 2002 .

[14]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Simulation of springback , 2002 .

[15]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  An assessment of numerical parameters influencing springback in explicit finite element analysis of sheet metal forming process , 1998 .

[16]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Inelastic effects on springback in metals , 2002 .

[17]  Dennis Urban,et al.  AISI/DOE Technology Roadmap Program: Characterization of Fatigue and Crash Performance of New Generation High Strength Steels for Automotive Applications , 2003 .

[18]  Y. Tozawa,et al.  Effect of Tensile Force in Stretch-Forming Process on the Springback , 1964 .

[19]  Luc Papeleux,et al.  Finite element simulation of springback in sheet metal forming , 2002 .