Wireless Systems Development Methodologies: An Analysis of Practice Using Actor Network Theory

There is a view that the structure of systems development on innovative projects is very different from that of traditional information systems projects (28). This calls for new systems development methodologies tailored to the specific needs of the current development environment. This paper uses the concepts of Actor Network Theory (ANT) to interpret the events that led to the turning around of a failing systems development methodology to success at the mobile application and development center. This paper uses ANT concepts to provide a richer understanding of complexities involved in wireless systems development from a social technical perspective.

[1]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Software firm evolution and innovation–orientation , 2002 .

[2]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research , 2000, ECIS.

[3]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[4]  Philip J. Pyburn,et al.  Linking the MIS Plan with Corporate Strategy: An Exploratory Study , 1983, MIS Q..

[5]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  K. Lewin Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[7]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Exploring the assumptions underlying information systems methodologies: Their impact on past, present and future ISM research , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Systems Without Method: The Impact of New Technologies on Information Systems Development Projects , 1992, The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development.

[9]  G. M. Wijers,et al.  Experiences with the Use of CASE-Tools in the Netherlands , 1990, CAiSE.

[10]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Keith Mander,et al.  The decline and fall of the American programmer , 2001, CACM.

[12]  J. Barrie Thompson,et al.  The use, limitations and customization of structured systems development methods in the United Kingdom , 1995, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  How to Combine Tools and Methods in Practice - a Field Study , 1990, CAiSE.

[15]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[16]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Systems development methodologies: the problem of tenses , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[17]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[18]  N. Patel,et al.  A value chain model for mobile data service providers , 2002 .

[19]  Jens Liegle,et al.  The efficacy of matching information systems development methodologies with application characteristics - an empirical study , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  M. Callon Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test , 1999 .

[21]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[22]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A market-based perspective on information systems development , 2001, CACM.