Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

When normal-hearing (NH) listeners compare the loudness of narrowband and wideband sounds presented at identical sound pressure levels, the wideband sound will most often be perceived as louder than the narrowband sound, a phenomenon referred to as loudness summation. Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners typically show less-than-normal loudness summation, due to reduced cochlear compressive gain and degraded frequency selectivity. In the present study, loudness summation at 1 and 3 kHz was estimated monaurally for five NH and eight HI listeners by matching the loudness of narrowband and wideband noise stimuli. The loudness summation was measured as a function both of noise bandwidth and level. The HI listeners were tested unaided and aided using three different compression systems to investigate the possibility of restoring loudness summation in these listeners. A compression system employing level-dependent compression channels yielded the most promising outcome. The present results inform the development of future loudness models and advanced compensation strategies for the hearing impaired.

[1]  J M Kates.  Optimal estimation of hearing-aid compression parameters. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[3]  Brent Edwards,et al.  Hearing Aids and Hearing Impairment , 2004 .

[4]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[6]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[7]  C Elberling,et al.  Loudness summation across frequency under masking and in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  L. Wilber,et al.  Reference thresholds for the ER-3A insert earphone. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Verhey,et al.  Spectral loudness summation for short and long signals as a function of level. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  V. Hohmann,et al.  Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[12]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Growth of Loudness in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Losses: Recruitment Reconsidered , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[13]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity across frequency using simultaneous notched-noise masking. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Brent Edwards.  Signal processing, hearing aid design, and the psychoacoustic turing test , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  Vit Drga,et al.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. Moore,et al.  The loudness of sounds whose spectra differ at the two ears. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B C Moore,et al.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.

[20]  Mary Florentine,et al.  A model of loudness summation applied to noise-induced hearing loss , 1979, Hearing Research.

[21]  A. Cacace,et al.  On the loudness of complex stimuli and its relationship to cochlear excitation. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[23]  E. Shaw.  Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  F. Zeng,et al.  Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B C Moore,et al.  Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.