Corporate social responsibility driven innovation

This study identifies the substantial relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovation activities of firms. Using the French Vigeo sustainability rating and the Thomson Reuters, we divided 619 firms into groups by their industry sectors, regions, and firm characteristics such as size and age. We premise that innovative investment is needed to prepare tomorrow's profits not only by considering investments in technology and in R&D, but also by dealing with sustainability to human, social, environmental, technical, and economic investments. Consequently, when the firm manipulates its short- and long-run business strategies, the consideration of the correlation between types of investment and CSR initiatives will lead to more cooperating effect on the outcome of investments. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding on the effect of sustainable management strategies on the innovation and sustainability of firms.

[1]  Keith Davis,et al.  Understanding the social responsibility puzzle , 1967 .

[2]  Birgit Blättel-Mink.  Innovation towards sustainable economy - the integration of economy and ecology in companies , 1998 .

[3]  S. Zeng,et al.  The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective , 2010 .

[4]  Y. Fassin.  The Reasons Behind Non-Ethical Behaviour in Business and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[5]  Eitan Naveh,et al.  Standardization and Discretion: Does the Environmental Standard ISO 14001 Lead to Performance Benefits? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2000 .

[7]  D. Jamali.  A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[8]  S. Wartick,et al.  Toward a Substantive Definition of the Corporate Issue Construct , 1994 .

[9]  Sandra Cavaco,et al.  The CSR-Firm Performance Missing Link: Complementarity Between Environmental, Social and Business Behavior Criteria? , 2013 .

[10]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[11]  A. Kalfagianni,et al.  Participation and inclusiveness in private rule-setting organizations: does it matter for effectiveness? , 2013 .

[12]  S. P. Sethi,et al.  Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework , 1975 .

[13]  Claudia Kemfert,et al.  The role of technological change for a sustainable development , 2005 .

[14]  Paola Garrone,et al.  Liberalisation, industry turmoil and the balance of R&D activities , 2001, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[15]  S. Labatt,et al.  Corporate Response to Environmental Issues: Packaging , 1997 .

[16]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[17]  Richard Welford,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North American and Asia: 2004 Survey Results , 2005 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[19]  Miguel A. Rodríguez,et al.  A new mindset for corporate sustainability , 2008 .

[20]  M. C. Jensen.  Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2001 .

[21]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[22]  Linda O’Riordan,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue , 2008 .

[23]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[24]  Jose M. Arau.  Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2002 .

[25]  Franck Aggeri,et al.  Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches , 1999 .

[26]  M. Wagner.  How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  N. Gunningham,et al.  Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[28]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[29]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis , 2005 .

[30]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality , 2002 .

[31]  F. Wolff,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe , 2009 .

[32]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  'Voluntary' Approaches to Environmental Regulation: A Survey , 1999 .

[33]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[34]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[35]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[36]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms , 1999 .

[37]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  The effectiveness of voluntary environmental initiatives , 2009 .

[38]  Cody Jones,et al.  Exploring new ways of assessing the effect of regulation on environmental management. , 2010 .

[39]  Issam c.,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,... , 2014 .

[40]  Frederic L. Pryor.  Capitalism and freedom , 2010 .

[41]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[42]  D. Melé,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory , 2004 .

[43]  D. Cetindamar.  Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of The United Nations Global Compact , 2007 .

[44]  T. Hellström,et al.  Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco‐innovation concepts , 2007 .

[45]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[46]  Thomas A. Hemphill.  Corporate Citizenship: The Case for a New Corporate Governance Model , 2004 .

[47]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect , 2011 .

[48]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[49]  K. B. Murray,et al.  Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts , 1997 .

[50]  J. Boatright.  The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[51]  Michaela A. Balzarova,et al.  ISO 26000 and supply chains--On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard , 2008 .

[52]  S. Hart.  Beyond Greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World. , 1997 .

[53]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[54]  U. Gelbmann.  Establishing strategic CSR in SMEs: an Austrian CSR quality seal to substantiate the strategic CSR performance , 2010 .

[55]  David E. Ervin,et al.  Motivations for Voluntary Environmental Management , 2007 .

[56]  Keith Davis,et al.  Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? , 1960 .

[57]  Marta de la Cuesta González,et al.  Fostering Corporate Social Responsibility Through Public Initiative: From the EU to the Spanish Case , 2004 .

[58]  D. Wood,et al.  Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations , 2002 .

[59]  Stephen. Pavelin,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance Content of Innovation in the U.K. , 2008 .

[60]  Yunhee Kim.  Environmental, Sustainable Behaviors and Innovation of Firms During the Financial Crisis , 2015 .