Binocular fusion limits are independent of contrast, luminance gradient and component phases

Panum's binocular fusion limit has been shown to increase with the size of graded contrast targets (Schor, Wood & Ogawa, 1984). This suggests the hypothesis that the fusion limit may be controlled by the maximum luminance gradients present in the stimuli. The luminance gradient is reciprocally related to image contrast, so the hypothesis predicts that the fusion limits should also decrease with increasing contrast. To investigate this luminance gradient hypothesis we designed stimuli in which the contrast and phase of the spatial frequency components could be varied independently of the luminance gradients. Disparity limits for fusion were unaffected by variations of as much as a log unit in contrast, luminance gradient or phase of the frequency components, disconfirming the luminance gradient hypothesis. Instead, fusion limits for various compound frequency targets were well predicted by the smallest fusion range for any spatial frequency component in the image that was above its contrast detection threshold.

[1]  P. Panum.  Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen , 1858 .

[2]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects , 1983 .

[3]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[4]  John M. Foley,et al.  Primary Distance Perception , 1978 .

[5]  George Mather,et al.  The dependence of edge displacement thresholds on edge blur, contrast and displacement distance , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled? , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  Stereoscopy re-stated , 1923 .

[8]  K Simons.  Effects on stereopsis of monocular versus binocular degradation of image contrast. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[10]  I C Wood,et al.  STEREOPSIS WITH SPATIALLY‐DEGRADED IMAGES * , 1983, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  P. Romano,et al.  Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  C. Schor,et al.  Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity. , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[16]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[18]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  H. Ono,et al.  The cyclopean eye vs. the sighting-dominant eye as the center of visual direction , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Sensory processing of binocular disparity , 1983 .

[21]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  G C Woo,et al.  The effect of exposure time on the foveal size of Panum's area. , 1974, Vision research.

[23]  C. Schor,et al.  Panum’s fusional area estimated with a criterion-free technique , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. Mitchell.  Retinal disparity and diplopia. , 1966, Vision research.

[25]  A Lit,et al.  Presentation of experimental data. , 1968, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[26]  James E. Sheedy,et al.  The perceived direction of the binocular image , 1979, Vision Research.

[27]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area , 1981, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Davidson.  Perturbation approach to spatial brightness interaction in human vision. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[29]  A. Steinhaus.  Contributions to Physiology , 1849, The Buffalo medical journal and monthly review of medical and surgical science.

[30]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[31]  C. Tyler.  Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity , 1975, Vision Research.

[32]  C W Tyler,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Movement: Two Eyes Less Sensitive than One , 1971, Science.